Is it me or is there virtually no promotion of hockey (men's or women's) with NBC? All of their recent Olympic advertisements/promotions center around snowboarding and figure skating. Nothing wrong with those sports, but c'mon, where's the hype for hockey? Makes me a little worried how much coverage the US teams are going to get.
Is it me or is there virtually no promotion of hockey (men's or women's) with NBC? All of their recent Olympic advertisements/promotions center around snowboarding and figure skating. Nothing wrong with those sports, but c'mon, where's the hype for hockey? Makes me a little worried how much coverage the US teams are going to get.
Hasn't that gotten better now that they have three or four networks to use for their coverage? It used to be the norm in the pre-cable days when after five minutes of a game they'd be back to Jim McKay in the studio, and then off to a human-interest story about all the different flavors of cheese that were available in the Olympic village.What's driving me nuts in the past is when they cut away from the middle of a great hockey game to show something like bobsledding or curling!
Hasn't that gotten better now that they have three or four networks to use for their coverage? It used to be the norm in the pre-cable days when after five minutes of a game they'd be back to Jim McKay in the studio, and then off to a human-interest story about all the different flavors of cheese that were available in the Olympic village.
I think it is worse with the Summer Olympics, because there as so many events that it is hard to show them all. For the Winter Games, there are events like cross country skiing and the long speed-skating events that don't fit into a nice, short package. They love the made-for-TV snowboarding events where they can't just show the three people and wind up on the podium and maybe an agony-of-defeat crash or two. And for both, prime time is worse when it isn't a live Olympics, because it is so prepackaged that they manage to remove much of the drama.The NBC primetime coverage of the Olympics is a joke. ... There are so many good events that the primetime coverage never even touches, or if they do, they hop in and out, I don't get as much out of it.
For all about a few events that I care enough to watch live, I just DVR them and watch an hour or two after the facts so that I can jump past all of the commercials.Well, I'd like to be the customer and have coverage tailored to what I want. And I'm willing to pay for it.
I think it is worse with the Summer Olympics, because there as so many events that it is hard to show them all. For the Winter Games, there are events like cross country skiing and the long speed-skating events that don't fit into a nice, short package. They love the made-for-TV snowboarding events where they can't just show the three people and wind up on the podium and maybe an agony-of-defeat crash or two. And for both, prime time is worse when it isn't a live Olympics, because it is so prepackaged that they manage to remove much of the drama.
I am old enough to remember distinctly the debates about granting the cable TV franchises and the promises that were made by those to whom we eventually granted these cash cow monopolies.What's far more annoying is the way they cover some of the other sports, especially cross country skiing and speed skating. It's not so much that they cut bits out, though there is still some of that, it's that almost half of the air time is devoted to commercials. Honestly, I wish there were pay-per-view channels where I could get just coverage and no ads. As a general rule, if you're getting something for free, as you are with Olympic coverage from NBC (if you have cable almost all of what you're paying goes to the cable company), you aren't the customer; you're the product. Well, I'd like to be the customer and have coverage tailored to what I want. And I'm willing to pay for it.
. . . you aren't the customer; you're the product.
We were promised that we could pay and get what we wanted. There was a lot of talk then about an "a la carte" selection menu which would be available to subscribers. Instead we got "packages" from the big conglomerates. Thank you ABC-Disney but just exactly how many ESPNs do you think I actually need? The "Ocho"?
I could be mistaken but I thought I read somewhere that NBC would be broadcasting all USA and Canada men's and women's hockey games during these Olympics on one channel or another. Am I making that up?
For all about a few events that I care enough to watch live, I just DVR them and watch an hour or two after the facts so that I can jump past all of the commercials.
You could just move to Canada and get coverage of that and a whole lot more. U.S. networks, in my experience, like to cover the 'human interest' stories of the Olympics while generally ignoring most of the actual events.