Re: Hockey East Tourney Thread - 2010
Why not? So I guess the main question is whether these 1 vs. 8 and 2 vs. 7 best-of-three series are actually good for the league & fans. I think in the first couple years the ECAC had these playoffs (when the league had 9 teams), these were about as interesting as the Olympic preliminary round (ouch). But I think now they're generally good for the league.
The WCHA is probably the better point of comparison though. Last year none of the quarterfinals series were particularly enticing. The single-elim format was more interesting, but it meant too many teams in one location. I recall Shannon Miller was against the idea of playoff expansion. I can see both sides of it.
I wouldn't want to see the tournament expanded unless the league grows to 9 or 10 teams.
Why not? So I guess the main question is whether these 1 vs. 8 and 2 vs. 7 best-of-three series are actually good for the league & fans. I think in the first couple years the ECAC had these playoffs (when the league had 9 teams), these were about as interesting as the Olympic preliminary round (ouch). But I think now they're generally good for the league.
The WCHA is probably the better point of comparison though. Last year none of the quarterfinals series were particularly enticing. The single-elim format was more interesting, but it meant too many teams in one location. I recall Shannon Miller was against the idea of playoff expansion. I can see both sides of it.