Re: Hobey hat trick
You seem to lack basic reading comprehension. Look at my comment ref Geoffrion and the WCHA. Geoffrion wasn't POTY in the WCHA but in my mind it doesn't hurt him as he lost to a goalie not another forward. I clear stated that, second to last paragraph. How can you be the best forward in the country and lose POTY in your own conference to another forward? IMO there aren’t enough non-conference games to do that.
Honestly I don't think Thessen should've been POTY in hockey east last year. There were clearly better players (particularly on BU).
Also I didn't say how it would go I said how I would vote.
So let’s hear your logic, I put my argument out there what is yours.
Otherwise you are just a jack***** and in that case who really fails?
No, there's no reading comprehension problems here.
First, you say Nyqvist shouldn't win b/c he's not the best "player" in his league, how can he be the best overall "player" - you made no distinction of position.
Next, yet you don't hold the same standard to the Wisc player who lost out to a goalie (who is not in the hat trick).
Then, you claim to me that he's not the best forward in his own conference, and therefore can't be best forward in the country.
Now you're arguing about positions. By the same logic, how can you be the best player in the country if you lose conference POY to a guy not in the hat trick? I don't necessarily believe that, but the logic is the same.
Finally, you purport that you disagree with last year's voting, but then use that same vote one year later to disqualify one player. When called out on this, you respond by compounding carmine's point, saying this is merely your logic for this year's vote. But apparently, your logic would be the opposite last year because you disagreed with that vote for HE POY. Then finally you plead ignorance on last year because there wasn't a UNH guy in it.
Cliff Notes:
Logic for 2010, POY vote disqualifies Player #1 because he lost that award to Player #2. But POY vote in another conference doesn't disqualify Player #3, even thought he lost it to Player #NotInHatTrick because they're different positions. But in 2009, the POY was not a valid merit to compare those 3 players because you disagree with it.
Nope.