What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

I think so, but it's extremely rare. I think the Pine Tar game was protested.
 
Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

The outcome of the game wasn't affected here, so I doubt that anything will happen.

On a side note... Only 3 teams have given up more runs (earned or not) than the Red Sox. Talk about run prevention!
 
Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

Chickens@NU said:
The outcome of the game wasn't affected here, so I doubt that anything will happen.

On a side note... Only 3 teams have given up more runs (earned or not) than the Red Sox. Talk about run prevention!
Click to expand...

When Theo talked about "run prevention", he added a second "prevention" under his breath. To that end, he's doing just fine. ;) :D
 
Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

Wakefield will get the start Sunday in place of Josh Beckett.
 
Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

Do you suppose Girardi feels a little silly now that Beckett is on the DL?
 
Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

Did the refs leave the stadium?

I'm almost expecting to see a shot of them headed to Remy's bar...

eta:

like clockwork, as soon as I post...they're back.
 
Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

Chickens@NU said:
The outcome of the game wasn't affected here, so I doubt that anything will happen.

On a side note... Only 3 teams have given up more runs (earned or not) than the Red Sox. Talk about run prevention!
Click to expand...

Hey! :mad:

Leave me out of this.

Thanks,
Clay B.
 
Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

amherstblackbear said:
Hey! :mad:

Leave me out of this.

Thanks,
Clay B.
Click to expand...

I still get a kick out of how well Buchholz is doing this year. Before the season started, the general consensus seemed to be that the top 3 (Lester, Lackey, and Beckett) were rock solid, Wakefield is Wakefield, Dice-K would be back in the rotation, and so Buchholz is/was expendable. People spoke about him like an afterthought. I don't know if the stats bear it out that he's been the most solid pitcher so far this year, but I feel the most confident with him on the mound at this point (Lester is getting there).
 
Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

thecomicbookguy said:
I still get a kick out of how well Buchholz is doing this year. Before the season started, the general consensus seemed to be that the top 3 (Lester, Lackey, and Beckett) were rock solid, Wakefield is Wakefield, Dice-K would be back in the rotation, and so Buchholz is/was expendable. People spoke about him like an afterthought. I don't know if the stats bear it out that he's been the most solid pitcher so far this year, but I feel the most confident with him on the mound at this point (Lester is getting there).
Click to expand...

Buccholz is something of a rarity...someone who is actually living up to his hype. He's not even 26 and he's already the Red Sox ace.
 
Re: Fun Prevention: Red Sox 2010 season thread part 1

Priceless said:
Buccholz is something of a rarity...someone who is actually living up to his hype. He's not even 26 and he's already the Red Sox ace.
Click to expand...

Lester is the ace. Buchholz will be very good. But Lester is the ace.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top