Re: Fighting Sioux to fight on...For one more year at least.
It is humorous to see those who claim righteousness defend their use of this nickname/logo by decrying analogous usage in other places.
"But Mommy, why do I have to clean my room? Billy across the street doesn't have to clean his!"
You folks here questioning and defending all this do realize that the probable majority of people in your state prefer that the nickname go away if for no other reason than to be done with the whole controversy? Isn't 5 or 6 years of this enough for you? Can you not learn to associate yourselves with some other symbology that isn't offensive to a group of people that had their lands stolen, culture nearly demolished and ancestors murdered by an invading force which disgustingly perverted their own religious beliefs to justify themselves?
Seriously, are your own personal identities that deeply tied to a college hockey teams name? You can survive this ... it is nothing more than a tiny slice removed from your spuriously adopted egos. Let it go. It's no more painful washing your hair in the shower.
I appreciate your post from a humanitarian and multicultural perspective and it spoke to my heart. You are right. I would add it takes a significant effort to uncover the authentic history (beyond the intrinsic selection bias within history textbooks) of Euro-American attitudes towards "Indians" as a malignant presence to be extirpated; and the well documented but obscure history of the perpetuity of government sponsored, systematic ethnocide and cultural genocide that virtually decimated Native American tribal culture over a half of millennium.
It's pretty clear from documented historical accounts not normally stocked on public school bookshelves, that the Christian influenced European expansionism agenda, under a perceived God ordained banner of manifest destiny, was responsible for the complete obliteration of entire tribes...men, women and children.
As an American, I've never been too proud of our historical human rights record towards particular ethnic immigrant people groups. But this historical holocaust was sadly without exception (true historical accounts of brutality towards Mexicans run a close second), the most infamous example of wholesale racism and premeditated annihilation of an aboriginal people group under the spurious guise of Christian values in the history of this country.
I recall reading shocking quotes like this from the 26th President of the United States, Teddy Roosevelt:
"I suppose I should be ashamed to say that I take the Western view of the Indian. I don't go so far as to think that the only good Indians are dead Indians, but I believe nine out of every ten are, and I shouldn't like to inquire too closely into the case of the tenth. The most vicious cowboy has more moral principle than the average Indian. Turn three hundred low families of New York into New Jersey, support them for fifty years in vicious idleness, and you will have some idea of what the Indians are. Reckless, revengeful, fiendishly cruel, they rob and murder, not the cowboys, who can take care of themselves, but the defenseless, lone settlers on the plains." -Teddy Roosevelt, New York, January 1886 (five years before becoming President).
Or this one by Congressman James M. Cavanaugh of Montana in 1868, who reiterated without rebuke from the floor of the House of Representatives perhaps the most infamous and widely held racial slur ever uttered in the United States Congress:
"I have never in my life seen a good Indian (and I have seen thousands) except when I have seen a dead Indian. I believe in the Indian policy pursued by New England in years long gone. I believe in the Indian policy which was taught by the great chieftain of Massachusetts, Miles Standish. I believe in the policy that exterminates the Indians, drives them outside the boundaries of civilization, because you cannot civilize them".
As time passed treaties were made, but regularly broken, frequently altered or completely ignored. The federal and state governments often re-acquired land designated for reservations if it was found that the land held significant economic value. So goes the historical and ongoing plight of Native Americans, whose multiethnic distinctives and sociocultural diversity has been typically castrated under the dominant culture's covert racist term, "Indians".
In my view, if a Native American tribe believes that stereotyping is an issue with a sports moniker, as much as I like the look of Sioux logo, name, jersey, we must let it go and give them the constitutional honor that is rightfully theirs as Americans to take whatever steps they feel are necessary to reconstruct their social identity. While I'm sure there are historical examples of brutality at the hands of Native American people against Euro-Americans, I am saddened by the extant atrocities that rivet our great history as a nation.
Let's not allow sports entertainment to blind us in myopic shortsightedness when we can at least do something, however small in retrospect, to redeem and mend historical injustices perpetrated towards a virtually disenfranchised people group that is seeking at the very most a voice and little dignity. In the end I believe this will be a win-win situation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"