polarbear2
Veteran
Re: D3 Scores and Highlights - 2010/11
FINAL:
Hamilton 2
Colby 1
FINAL:
Hamilton 2
Colby 1
So...who made the phone call to collegehockeystats about the travesty of Leclerc not getting a point for being on the ice last night for Norwich's lone goal and got that changedI guess that's almost as good as a win.
Hey 5 4, what was that about playing for awards?
So...who made the phone call to collegehockeystats about the travesty of Leclerc not getting a point for being on the ice last night for Norwich's lone goal and got that changedI guess that's almost as good as a win.
Hey 5 4, what was that about playing for awards?
No moaning here. Guess I'm just a proponent of getting things right. My bad.
Take a sip of your own medicine Trots.
Puzzling as to why Adrian would start(statistically) their third best goalie in a pivotal conference game.
This RIT has no class conversation is getting old...we have it every year.
5 4 Fighting said:Laura Hurd wouldn't have cared.
Alright. I've bit my tongue on this long enough.
5 4 this is nothing personal but give it a rest bud.
You never even met Laura, correct? I did and I knew her family quite well too. The day I found out the news of her passing was one of the worst days of my life. I lost a friend.
I also know Sophie Leclerc and her family and I can tell you she exemplifies everything you would want in a Laura Hurd Award winner.
She gives 110 percent on every shift of every game. She will oftentimes pass the puck to a teammate rather than take a shot herself. Her stats probably could have been better every season if she was a bit more selfish with her shot selection but instead she thinks pass first rather than shoot first.
I've watched Sophie play close to 20 times now and I've never seen a game where she wasn't the best player on the ice. Laura was the same way.
This non-sense saying Leclerc's stats are tainted etc is mularkey and needs to end. The NCAA cleared her to play. End of story.
I understand the #1 goalie got dinged in the first game and was not able to play today. The "statistically" third best goalie managed to staunch the bleeding against RIT last week (only 2 goals in the 3rd) after the #1 gave up 6 goals in the first 2 periods.
I've seen both of Adrian's backups play a few years ago, and IMHO they gave the better goalie the start.
Not a great game statistically, but with Adrian, you tend to get weak 2nd games (a team effort) on many weekends.
Adrian outshot Steven's Point 26-20 so how was it not a great game statistically? I did not see game, how were the the quality of shots were from either side, etc? Two of the goals were SP power plays. I'm not sure how your basing your goalie opinion, but that's okay. Not really important. Where was the team that took three out of four from second place Superior?
It has been some time since I've seen them play and although goalies do regress, what you see in a goalie in their last year of club/prep hockey is pretty much 90% baked for the college game. Not taking away from the weekend at Superior, but Superior is a very young team and she played them relatively early in the season.
Folks, we have been over this before. It's this coach's MO.
16-0-0 team against a 0-7-0 team who has his team direct 23 shots at a clearly beaten opponent in the 3rd period while running his top lines. Add this mentality to coach playing the proposed D1 move card as a recruiting tool and I would suggest you have something well short of a Coach of the Year candidate.
When are you leaving again?
The counter argument to this is how disrespectful is it to play keep away? As a hockey player I find that to be more embarassing.
The problem is is that there is no solution but to not schedule the inferior team. Obviously with conferences this is not possible. Had RIT called off the dogs and played keep away we may not be talking about it on here, but those that were at the game may be disgusted by the lack of respect shown for the opponent. On the other hand, if they keep playing and trying to get better as a team and end up running up the score, we all go crazy as if we know what it is like to be on the ice in a game like that. I know the point was brought up last year that even if RIT were to be rolling their 3rd and 4th line people would be upset that they were scoring goals. But is the coach supposed to ask his players that barely see the ice to not try and score some points for themselves? Are you going to ask your young freshman not to try and rack up a few points for themselves?
I am not saying I agree with running up a score, but I am not saying I am not. I think each situation is different and it is easy for us as observers to sit back and complain.
Lol, who says that is the MO?
Maybe he wanted everyone to have a chance to score?
What would you have them do? Skate around with the puck for the rest of the game? I would think that would be even more embarrassing.
Lol, who says that is the MO?
Maybe he wanted everyone to have a chance to score?
What would you have them do? Skate around with the puck for the rest of the game? I would think that would be even more embarrassing.
It's very simple. Sit your top lines. Double shift lines 3 and 4 and, giving them playing time, and make everyone shoot from above the circles only, and play all five D on the PP. Up here in Canuck land there is such a thing as "respect for the game", "respect for the refs" and "respect for the oppostion". I witnessed another case of running up the score this weekend. Put a bitter taste in my mouth, and lost a lot of respect for that team, specially considering it was a meaningless NC game.
Where is the respect for the opposition in saying "Look, we can beat you with one hand tied behind our backs"? That's showing off. "Respect" means treating the opponent as an equal.
Powers &8^]
With all due respect, playing your 3 and 4 the lines more and shooting from far only is not the same as showing up the opposition. It even works for the wining team by giving the 3rd and 4th liners more playing time. I think it is more disrespectful to run up the score and show "Look how good we are".