What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

CCHA teams will join WCHA

Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

And what type of reaction did you expect? Make stupid, a-hole remarks and you'll get treated like a stupid a-hole. Not really an over-reaction or "hyper-sensitive" as I have quit taking anything you say too seriously long ago. More like a common sense response to a purely asinine remark. Whatever it takes to ease that inferiority complex you got going in relation to MN hockey, I guess.

20 minutes. I was off.
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

LakerBlue hit the nail on the head. **** the Big Mistake, **** the BHHC. I wouldn't care if the WCHA schools never scheduled any of them again.
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

Well, its good news for those of us in Laker Country. This is the core of a very nice league, with Tech, NMU, and LSSU all together along with UAF and UAA and Bemidji. I like that grouping. A nice, solid, North-country-centric hockey league.

So its good for my school, good for the other UP schools, and good for the Alaska schools. And thats good enough for me.
And yet you blast the B1G and NCHC teams for doing what's best for them! :rolleyes:

Sean
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

Just curious, how many SCSU, Mankato, BSU, or even UMD fans out there would like too see their school stop scheduling the Gophers like LakerBlue (in all his demented wisdom) is suggesting? How many blame the Gophers for the formation of the BTHC?

From a very basic stand point, I get what LakerBlue is getting at. Lets face it, the Big Ten schools did what was best for THEM and basically gave a big old middle finger to the "lesser" schools. Then you had the NCHC form out of some of the schools that felt left out and those schools also gave a big old middle finger to what was left of the WCHA and CCHA.

In an ideal world, I would support the apparent lesser school turning around and telling both NCHC and BTHC schools to go the hell away. If they are too good to be in the same conference with say SCSU, why should SCSU work with them to fill a schedule out?

But you know what, its NOT an ideal world. And lets face it, when it all comes down to it its not about hockey, its about money. SCSU, BSU, Kato, etc. all like having the big boys come and play because it draws in the money. They will schedule UMN because they know its best for getting butts in the seat. If scheduling BTHC and/or NCHC teams helps kept "lesser" programs going its better than letting programs shutdown to prove a point.
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

From a very basic stand point, I get what LakerBlue is getting at. Lets face it, the Big Ten schools did what was best for THEM and basically gave a big old middle finger to the "lesser" schools. Then you had the NCHC form out of some of the schools that felt left out and those schools also gave a big old middle finger to what was left of the WCHA and CCHA.

In an ideal world, I would support the apparent lesser school turning around and telling both NCHC and BTHC schools to go the hell away. If they are too good to be in the same conference with say SCSU, why should SCSU work with them to fill a schedule out?

But you know what, its NOT an ideal world. And lets face it, when it all comes down to it its not about hockey, its about money. SCSU, BSU, Kato, etc. all like having the big boys come and play because it draws in the money. They will schedule UMN because they know its best for getting butts in the seat. If scheduling BTHC and/or NCHC teams helps kept "lesser" programs going its better than letting programs shutdown to prove a point.

The Big Ten and NCHC gave the WCHA and CCHA the finger just like the WCHA and CCHA are giving Alabama-Huntsville the finger.
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

It would make more sense to have the WCHA add Air Force, in the west, and the Atlantic Conference add UAH. I don't see how UAH could afford to travel to Alaska.

Soo to Fairbanks: $1208, Huntsville to Fairbanks: $752, LSSU bus to Detroit and fly from there: $740
 
From a very basic stand point, I get what LakerBlue is getting at. Lets face it, the Big Ten schools did what was best for THEM and basically gave a big old middle finger to the "lesser" schools. Then you had the NCHC form out of some of the schools that felt left out and those schools also gave a big old middle finger to what was left of the WCHA and CCHA.

In an ideal world, I would support the apparent lesser school turning around and telling both NCHC and BTHC schools to go the hell away. If they are too good to be in the same conference with say SCSU, why should SCSU work with them to fill a schedule out?

But you know what, its NOT an ideal world. And lets face it, when it all comes down to it its not about hockey, its about money. SCSU, BSU, Kato, etc. all like having the big boys come and play because it draws in the money. They will schedule UMN because they know its best for getting butts in the seat. If scheduling BTHC and/or NCHC teams helps kept "lesser" programs going its better than letting programs shutdown to prove a point.

On the flip side, the UMN could just as easily schedule it's NC games against the likes of UND, DU, ND, etc... but it is trying to do the right thing for better or worse. And for the record, I'm not so certain the UMN was all that in favor of the BTHC. At least that's what I've heard. They certainly weren't the ones pushing for it's formation.

And though they may not have been in favor of it, they certainly wouldn't have had much choice if they were out voted (at least if they cared to stay in the B10 for other sports).
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

The Big Ten and NCHC gave the WCHA and CCHA the finger just like the WCHA and CCHA are giving Alabama-Huntsville the finger.

Your right, and UAH fans have every right to be ****ed at all the Conferences in College hockey that won't accept them. I'm not going to pretend that somehow my favorite school and conference is so noble in all there actions.
 
Your right, and UAH fans have every right to be ****ed at all the Conferences in College hockey that won't accept them. I'm not going to pretend that somehow my favorite school and conference is so noble in all there actions.

I don't think any conference or program is completely noble, but I'd like to think there is a root level of respect between all the MN programs. I know I (and many I know) are that way.

As for UAH, I really feel for them.
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

On the flip side, the UMN could just as easily schedule it's NC games against the likes of UND, DU, ND, etc... but it is trying to do the right thing for better or worse. And for the record, I'm not so certain the UMN was all that in favor of the BTHC. At least that's what I've heard. They certainly weren't the ones pushing for it's formation.

And though they may not have been in favor of it, they certainly wouldn't have had much choice if they were out voted (at least if they cared to stay in the B10 for other sports).

I'm talking more generally. As far as the Gophers go, I'm not sure where they stood while the Big Ten was being formed. I'm not going to give them a huge thank you note for scheduling the other Minnesota schools either. It makes sense for them to play teams that are as close as the other Minnesota schools. A non conference matchup with a team thats just an hour bus ride away is much more attractive then going out of state. I'm not going to pretend that somehow Minnesota is great because they are willing to schedule teams that are closer to them and have some history with over other non conference teams. Plus, I would wager a non conference game against the Minnesota school will put more people at Minnesota home games as well than many other possible non conference games.
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

So now every college hockey team west of Buffalo, NY, (except for USAFA and UAH) plus one (Penn State) has "they killed college hockey" blood on their hands. :D
 
Last edited:
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

I think you need to get your facts straight. for one DU is a bad draw at SCSU and they will get as many people at games for NMU and company as they got for DU. UW was a great draw, but look at how many times over the last 20 years they played at SCSU....We never played them at home any way so yes it is a loss, but not as big as you think. UND is a huge loss becuase when we played them and the Goofers it was a sell out every time. Since the Goofers are going to play us home and home every year the only loss is not playing UND. Hopefully motzko can get the flicketails at the NHC after they leave the conference.
Excuse me for not having my "facts straight". Apparently I haven't had time to make it to all the SUCS home games to see what attendance was like for a sconnie and DU series.:rolleyes: My apologies. I think you got my point....
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

I think you need to get your facts straight. for one DU is a bad draw at SCSU and they will get as many people at games for NMU and company as they got for DU. UW was a great draw, but look at how many times over the last 20 years they played at SCSU....We never played them at home any way so yes it is a loss, but not as big as you think. UND is a huge loss becuase when we played them and the Goofers it was a sell out every time. Since the Goofers are going to play us home and home every year the only loss is not playing UND. Hopefully motzko can get the flicketails at the NHC after they leave the conference.

What do you mean we never played UW at home? And playing the Gophers once a year does not exactly mean "problem solved." Now based on the temporary 12-team league, yeah, you only lose one extra series with them every 5 years, but based on when we were in a ten team league with them, that's a series we're losing every other year. And I've seen the Gophers say they'll play us every year, I haven't seen anything that has said they'll come to our building every other year. I'll priase a 1:1 deal when I see it.

Just curious, how many SCSU, Mankato, BSU, or even UMD fans out there would like too see their school stop scheduling the Gophers like LakerBlue (in all his demented wisdom) is suggesting? How many blame the Gophers for the formation of the BTHC?

Honestly, I'm not upset with MN or even UW... UW ay have wanted the Big10 to happen, it was circumstances that created Penn State getting money, and once they got 6 teams they HAD to form a league. MN doesn't sound like they wanted it... conference with 4 in-state rivals, UND, CC, DU, hell even they have some good ties to MTU, and Anchorage which meant extra games a lot of years. They formed a conference they were required to and they have traditions. I don't like the knee-jerk, panic reaction of the NCHC, and I think DU and UND are most responsible, so there's where my frustration and disappointment, particularly in UND, lie.

That being said, I wanna keep playing ALL of them. This, "Let's stop scheduling those ********" attitude is purely cutting off your no to spite your face. If we say **** you to DU and UND, they'll go, "Oh... well ok," and they'll move on. I think UND will miss playing their WCHA paired rival, a team that's pretty close, and a team that they've had some great matchups with, but they'll move on, and they'll be fine. DU won't care if we never play them again, and I only wanna play DU because they're a good caliber team, but tommy's right, the NHC doesn't care when the Jelly Doughnuts come to town. Of course I wanna see MN, they're important financially, and to a lesser extent so are UW and tUMD. I may have bad feelings towards some of those teams, but giving them the finger when they're gonna do fine without us and they're still our best draws (MN, UND, UW, tUMD our best 4 draws I believe, in that order) isn't the right way to go about it. The right way is to schedule them whenever we can, make some $ off of them, and see if we can't knock beat them on the ice.
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

On the flip side, the UMN could just as easily schedule it's NC games against the likes of UND, DU, ND, etc... but it is trying to do the right thing for better or worse. And for the record, I'm not so certain the UMN was all that in favor of the BTHC. At least that's what I've heard. They certainly weren't the ones pushing for it's formation.

And though they may not have been in favor of it, they certainly wouldn't have had much choice if they were out voted (at least if they cared to stay in the B10 for other sports).
I'm going to take a wait and see approach regarding scheduling. Unlike 4four4, I didn't read Roman's blog to mean that MN will be penciling in 10 games, year after year, against UMD, SCSU, BSU and Mankato, between the home and homes, games against Duluth, and the Xcel Minnnesota tourney. But maybe.

The Big 10 and NCHC teams that bolted the current conference arrangements for purely perceived economic advantages are going to be stuck walking a fine line. They need to continue to support the smaller programs, to allow college hockey to flourish, but they also need to raise revenue. We'll see how much the Big 10 network prefers to have MN playing BSU, as opposed to Notre Dame or Boston College.
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

I'm talking more generally. As far as the Gophers go, I'm not sure where they stood while the Big Ten was being formed. I'm not going to give them a huge thank you note for scheduling the other Minnesota schools either. It makes sense for them to play teams that are as close as the other Minnesota schools. A non conference matchup with a team thats just an hour bus ride away is much more attractive then going out of state. I'm not going to pretend that somehow Minnesota is great because they are willing to schedule teams that are closer to them and have some history with over other non conference teams. Plus, I would wager a non conference game against the Minnesota school will put more people at Minnesota home games as well than many other possible non conference games.

Then why weren't the Gophers playing Bemidji much before? And trivia question: how often did they GO to Bemidji for non-conference? You act like they NEED to come up with close-by road games. When do the Gophers go on the road for OOC? Not often. They could tell ECAC and AHA and even Hockey East schools "Come to our barn... and don't expect a return trip" and get away with it. So if they give us anything close to a 1:1 deal, I for one will be very appreciative.
 
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA

What do you mean we never played UW at home? And playing the Gophers once a year does not exactly mean "problem solved." Now based on the temporary 12-team league, yeah, you only lose one extra series with them every 5 years, but based on when we were in a ten team league with them, that's a series we're losing every other year. And I've seen the Gophers say they'll play us every year, I haven't seen anything that has said they'll come to our building every other year. I'll priase a 1:1 deal when I see it.



Honestly, I'm not upset with MN or even UW... UW ay have wanted the Big10 to happen, it was circumstances that created Penn State getting money, and once they got 6 teams they HAD to form a league. MN doesn't sound like they wanted it... conference with 4 in-state rivals, UND, CC, DU, hell even they have some good ties to MTU, and Anchorage which meant extra games a lot of years. They formed a conference they were required to and they have traditions. I don't like the knee-jerk, panic reaction of the NCHC, and I think DU and UND are most responsible, so there's where my frustration and disappointment, particularly in UND, lie.

That being said, I wanna keep playing ALL of them. This, "Let's stop scheduling those ********" attitude is purely cutting off your no to spite your face. If we say **** you to DU and UND, they'll go, "Oh... well ok," and they'll move on. I think UND will miss playing their WCHA paired rival, a team that's pretty close, and a team that they've had some great matchups with, but they'll move on, and they'll be fine. DU won't care if we never play them again, and I only wanna play DU because they're a good caliber team, but tommy's right, the NHC doesn't care when the Jelly Doughnuts come to town. Of course I wanna see MN, they're important financially, and to a lesser extent so are UW and tUMD. I may have bad feelings towards some of those teams, but giving them the finger when they're gonna do fine without us and they're still our best draws (MN, UND, UW, tUMD our best 4 draws I believe, in that order) isn't the right way to go about it. The right way is to schedule them whenever we can, make some $ off of them, and see if we can't knock beat them on the ice.

I said over the last 20 years. When the Huskies played the Gophers every year they only got UW at home once every three or four years. With the 12 teams it would have been more, but that hasn't happened and now the league has split up.

I know it is not in writing yet but I heard we will do a home and home with them every year and so will Mankato. then UMD and BSU will trade off years. That way they still get the home games they need every year. Is this for sure? no, but you don't know it won't happen either....
 
Back
Top