What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Sorry, I was just trying to do what was asked of me.

And not a particularly good job of it, either. Your manner of talking about things in a roundabout manner has led to a lot of confusion on my part in this thread. I didn't even realize you were referring to the December post when you dug this "personal matter" issue up.

I'm sorry, some of us "outsiders" here have a difficult time with keeping up with all of the references.
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

And not a particularly good job of it, either. Your manner of talking about things in a roundabout manner has led to a lot of confusion on my part in this thread. I didn't even realize you were referring to the December post when you dug this "personal matter" issue up.

I'm sorry, some of us "outsiders" here have a difficult time with keeping up with all of the references.

LOL, are we now throwing hcky85 under the zamboni?
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

And if you would do a little more research on my posts, you'll find my purpose of being here is to defend coaches in general against this type of thread, started by an insider trying to throw a coach under the bus - wrong on so many levels. You joined the food-fight half-way in, completely missing this fact and start incorrectly attributing motives. You completely misinterpret my motives and continue to engage in poorly-substantiated charges. .

That's you calling the kettle black. My first posts were related to a siimple question that I asked. The fact that you and your likenesses chose to interpret it as anti-coach makes you - from your quote - "completely misinterpret my motives and continue to engage in poorly-substantiated charges".

You should not spew a moral high road to anyone when you've been one of the first to lose your way.
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

I'll knock your opinion because IT DOES NOT BELONG ON THIS BOARD. Insiders such as you should not use this forum as a means to get a coach fired.

And you still haven't said which of us is Digit.

And I'll keep on this until you do.

Again, read the first posts I made and perhaps you'll get an understanding of where I came from.
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Is it only me or does it seem specific information on the problem(s) at Brown is drizzeled out or sparingly issued to us outsiders? To me it seems the info is given in this fashion to drag out this thread and to prolong the misery. If you have something to say please say it. Come clean with all the specific info you have and quit using us and this forum for your own personal grudge match.
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Agree. And to paraphrase what I said quite a few pages back (and only days ago :rolleyes: )

GHF, please go back and read hcky85's posts. S/he explained quite succinctly why writing to the AD at Brown would be an exercise in futility. It would be a good idea if it hadn't already been tried.
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

It's getting to be a little like watching Jersey Shore.

Only thing missing is for some twisted tryst to become known!

:eek:
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

And for the record when I said I thought Digit acted inappropriately, I did not just mean things that she discussed with the team. I thought it was completely unnecessary and unprofessional to let someone’s personal matters be talked amongst coaches at different schools. The narrative of this post makes it seem very unlikely that it originated from anyone else’s but one of the coaches’ mouths.

I heard about it at the Hingham Rink.
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

GHF, please go back and read hcky85's posts. S/he explained quite succinctly why writing to the AD at Brown would be an exercise in futility. It would be a good idea if it hadn't already been tried.

... And posting here will do nothing either. You two (or are you one?) have gotten the word out. Many of us don't agree with your approach, but we are all well aware that there may be something worng at Brown. Your job is done.
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

And not a particularly good job of it, either. Your manner of talking about things in a roundabout manner has led to a lot of confusion on my part in this thread. I didn't even realize you were referring to the December post when you dug this "personal matter" issue up.

I'm sorry, some of us "outsiders" here have a difficult time with keeping up with all of the references.

So it's not hcky85's fault that you don't get it.
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Is it only me or does it seem specific information on the problem(s) at Brown is drizzeled out or sparingly issued to us outsiders? To me it seems the info is given in this fashion to drag out this thread and to prolong the misery. If you have something to say please say it. Come clean with all the specific info you have and quit using us and this forum for your own personal grudge match.

That is not accurate Big Red. The reason is so that the VICTIMS are able to remain anonymous.
 
Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

... And posting here will do nothing either. You two (or are you one?) have gotten the word out. Many of us don't agree with your approach, but we are all well aware that there may be something worng at Brown. Your job is done.

I'll be done when the kids are back on the team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top