mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
That's messed up
That's messed up
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
- Thread starter DaveStPaul
- Start date
- Status
And one would doubt that the person depraved enough to sell those pictures would donate the proceeds
JohnsonsJerseys
Michigan Tech Fan
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
Sorry I didn't feel like surfing through pages of posts, but can one of you point me to a link of BU's 12-13 schedule, or at least what is known at this point. Mainly concerned with October home games.
Thanks,
Ryan J
Sorry I didn't feel like surfing through pages of posts, but can one of you point me to a link of BU's 12-13 schedule, or at least what is known at this point. Mainly concerned with October home games.
Thanks,
Ryan J
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
I don't believe it's available yet. There may be pieces of it on the 2012-2013 schedules thread. Home opener is October 13th.
On a separate note - congrats to any and all BU students who graduated yesterday. Looks like you had a few thousand uninvited visitors. Seriously, that would have freaked me out and I would have left. I hate bees.
I don't believe it's available yet. There may be pieces of it on the 2012-2013 schedules thread. Home opener is October 13th.
On a separate note - congrats to any and all BU students who graduated yesterday. Looks like you had a few thousand uninvited visitors. Seriously, that would have freaked me out and I would have left. I hate bees.
Nick Papagiorgio
Holding court
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
http://wild.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=631386
Nice to see Charlie Coyle has done well in the Q (as he should be). Playoff MVP.
Cue Bob Lobel.
http://wild.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=631386
Nice to see Charlie Coyle has done well in the Q (as he should be). Playoff MVP.
Cue Bob Lobel.
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
Couldn't have been Kurker. Haven't we heard from all non-BU folks that he's not coming?? Even though he tweeted he got his acceptance letter? Refuse to believe it. Those folks are never wrong.
Couldn't have been Kurker. Haven't we heard from all non-BU folks that he's not coming?? Even though he tweeted he got his acceptance letter? Refuse to believe it. Those folks are never wrong.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
i haven't read that from hoky, so we can't say one way or the other.
Couldn't have been Kurker. Haven't we heard from all non-BU folks that he's not coming?? Even though he tweeted he got his acceptance letter? Refuse to believe it. Those folks are never wrong.
i haven't read that from hoky, so we can't say one way or the other.
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
But others have said it and they know much more about our recruits!!!!!!1!!!!!
But others have said it and they know much more about our recruits!!!!!!1!!!!!
defkit
New member
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
I was wondering the same thing. IIRC, Peter McArthur came a year early, and he certainly stepped right in. (I may be a little confused - I know there was a point at which he was worried that he wasn't ready yet, but not sure what led to that discussion).
Either way, this is outstanding news, especially given how definitive some of the "he's gone" statements were just weeks ago.
I was wondering the same thing. IIRC, Peter McArthur came a year early, and he certainly stepped right in. (I may be a little confused - I know there was a point at which he was worried that he wasn't ready yet, but not sure what led to that discussion).
Either way, this is outstanding news, especially given how definitive some of the "he's gone" statements were just weeks ago.
Friend_of_BU_Hockey
Registered User
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
I think it was the opposite. I believe MacArthur was supposed to come in the 2003-04 season as a true (18 yo) Freshman, but played 1 season in USHL (Waterloo) after prep (Northwood).
As a byproduct of MacArthur being pushed back a year, Chris Higgins was pushed back a year. IIRC Higgins was originally targeted for the 2004-05 season, but played 1 season in EJHL (NH Jr. Monarchs) following prep (Pingree).
I think it was the opposite. I believe MacArthur was supposed to come in the 2003-04 season as a true (18 yo) Freshman, but played 1 season in USHL (Waterloo) after prep (Northwood).
As a byproduct of MacArthur being pushed back a year, Chris Higgins was pushed back a year. IIRC Higgins was originally targeted for the 2004-05 season, but played 1 season in EJHL (NH Jr. Monarchs) following prep (Pingree).
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
Kurker's predecessor as captain and top scorer at St. John's Prep, Colin Blackwell, went directly to Harvard and put up a 4-15-19 line, tied for 6th on the Crimson. Blackwell was drafted by San Jose in the 7th round last June
Kurker's predecessor as captain and top scorer at St. John's Prep, Colin Blackwell, went directly to Harvard and put up a 4-15-19 line, tied for 6th on the Crimson. Blackwell was drafted by San Jose in the 7th round last June
carltonbarrett
New member
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
Hmmm, his coach said Coyle is the most complete player he's ever seen at the Major Junior level, then he's named the Q playoff MVP, yet BU fanboys felt him leaving was pretty much an "addition by subtraction" situation. Bet you could have used him instead of some of those 5th liners you skated vs MN in the NCAA's....
Hmmm, his coach said Coyle is the most complete player he's ever seen at the Major Junior level, then he's named the Q playoff MVP, yet BU fanboys felt him leaving was pretty much an "addition by subtraction" situation. Bet you could have used him instead of some of those 5th liners you skated vs MN in the NCAA's....
ericredaxe
Veteran
Hmmm there were very few (if any) comments about the team being better without coyle. Maybe you are confusing that with many people agreeing that Trivino was a bigger loss.... Either that or your superfanboy nature is showing.
If anything most people commented that we would have done better had we not lost those players.
carltonbarrett
New member
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
Negative, most fanboys suggested he was really no loss at all and wouldn't be missed. I remember wondering what the he!! they were talking about as he was 2nd or 3rd in points on the team I believe when he left.
Negative, most fanboys suggested he was really no loss at all and wouldn't be missed. I remember wondering what the he!! they were talking about as he was 2nd or 3rd in points on the team I believe when he left.
Harry Cleverly
New member
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
Any information on the incident that caused Robert Polesello to decommit, after being asked to wait a year? Obviously, it wasn't bad enough to rescind a scholarship offer. But given the recent off-ice issues ...
Polesello was considered a top college prospect, despite his size, but had a very mediocre year.
Kurker moves up a year, and I believe he'll be a very good college player. Maybe even right away.
Any information on the incident that caused Robert Polesello to decommit, after being asked to wait a year? Obviously, it wasn't bad enough to rescind a scholarship offer. But given the recent off-ice issues ...
Polesello was considered a top college prospect, despite his size, but had a very mediocre year.
Kurker moves up a year, and I believe he'll be a very good college player. Maybe even right away.
defkit
New member
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
I'd say the correct answer is in between. There were definitely one or two BU fans who felt Coyle was not a factor and that the team would not miss him (and were very vocal about that opinion). But I would say most (including myself) felt the team was worse off without him.
As a side note, I think the general feeling was that he would be a top player in the Q, given the age difference versus college. So I'm not sure that his performance or the coaches comments are necessarily going to change opinions on either side. The real test will be to see how he does at the pro level. I for one hope he is successful. I don't like the way he left the team, right in the middle of the year, but it's done and everyone has moved on.
I'd say the correct answer is in between. There were definitely one or two BU fans who felt Coyle was not a factor and that the team would not miss him (and were very vocal about that opinion). But I would say most (including myself) felt the team was worse off without him.
As a side note, I think the general feeling was that he would be a top player in the Q, given the age difference versus college. So I'm not sure that his performance or the coaches comments are necessarily going to change opinions on either side. The real test will be to see how he does at the pro level. I for one hope he is successful. I don't like the way he left the team, right in the middle of the year, but it's done and everyone has moved on.
candycanes99
HAVE SOME CLASS
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth
There certainly were some loudmouths who were saying things like that, but you'll notice they're the same ones that are always the debbie downers on guys.
Just for fun, my posts at the time:
http://board.uscho.com/showthread.p...ad-Part-Deux&p=5298973&viewfull=1#post5298973
http://board.uscho.com/showthread.p...III-Now-What&p=5299601&viewfull=1#post5299601
There certainly were some loudmouths who were saying things like that, but you'll notice they're the same ones that are always the debbie downers on guys.
Just for fun, my posts at the time:
http://board.uscho.com/showthread.p...ad-Part-Deux&p=5298973&viewfull=1#post5298973
http://board.uscho.com/showthread.p...III-Now-What&p=5299601&viewfull=1#post5299601
- Status