What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

“There was a drinking rule that was broken earlier during the year, and then I was late to a bike ride, and that was pretty much it really,” Saponari said.

Just taking this one quote...not sure who to believe here. On one hand, Parker has some history in shoeing guys out the door, but on the other hand, Saponari messed up at least twice (3rd time if you count his youtube thing). Was there more involved that Vinny isn't talking about? Who knows, but ultimately I don't disagree with him that Parker was looking to make an example of someone.
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

Coming out of my lurker cave to discuss this somewhat disturbing quote from the article:

"I made a mistake or two since I’ve been here, but I didn’t feel like I was a bad thing for the team, or any kind of bad influence."

Obviously everyone makes mistakes, & has their own subjective opinion as to which ones are a big deal & which ones are excusable. But it should have been communicated to these guys which mistakes are which in the context of BU hockey, & what constitutes being a bad influence on the team.

Whether that responsibility falls on the veteran players or the coaching staff is up for debate. Based on the rest of the article, it seems like some attempts at coach-administered discipline were made throughout the season, but didn't have the desired effect. Hopefully next time JP will be a little tougher a little sooner, & the captains will also step up to hold their teammates accountable.
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

“There was a drinking rule that was broken earlier during the year, and then I was late to a bike ride, and that was pretty much it really,” Saponari said.

Just taking this one quote...not sure who to believe here. On one hand, Parker has some history in shoeing guys out the door, but on the other hand, Saponari messed up at least twice (3rd time if you count his youtube thing). Was there more involved that Vinny isn't talking about? Who knows, but ultimately I don't disagree with him that Parker was looking to make an example of someone.

As budlite posted above, Parker's history of discipline has been somewhat inconsistent. It takes an awful lot for him to publicly discipline a more "talented" player. And others have pointed out that the drinking incident in question was not likely the only one of its' kind, either for these three or others on the team. But being accountable for your actions and accepting your responsibility has to be important on any team. So Vinny's response to this as [“There was a drinking rule that was broken earlier during the year, and then I was late to a bike ride, and that was pretty much it really,” Saponari said.] doesn't pass the smell test. I'd go with 3hock's suggestion.
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

Wasn't his suggestion just that Saponari wasn't booted for the drinking incident? If that's true, was he booted for being late to a team bike ride (were coaches present or did someone rat him out?)

Or something else?
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

Wasn't his suggestion just that Saponari wasn't booted for the drinking incident? If that's true, was he booted for being late to a team bike ride (were coaches present or did someone rat him out?)

Or something else?

Without having any immediate knowldege of the situation... my guess is that those were probablly just the icing on the cake.
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

As budlite posted above, Parker's history of discipline has been somewhat inconsistent.

IIRC, Brendan Walsh's final straw involved bringing refreshments to his punishment run (beer and chinese food?). Anyone recall the initial transgression?
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

IIRC, Brendan Walsh's final straw involved bringing refreshments to his punishment run (beer and chinese food?). Anyone recall the initial transgression?

JP anticipated that Walshie would be an unspeakably bad commentator during NESN broadcasts and punished him in advance for it.
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

I don't get where people are implying that "good players" get away with more.... It is sad to admit, but from where I'm looking Vincent is (was) arguably the best returning player.
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

I wouldn't know much about 27's habits this season, but I do agree with your larger point that certain players get away with a lot, others don't. But I suspect that's true with most teams and for most coaches. That doesn't make it right, but it is what it is. Of course that raises the possibility that the coach might "lose" the team, and some have suggested that over the past number of years that some of Parker's teams have shown these signs. Being accountable to the team and your teammates is of paramount importance, particularly in a sport like hockey where success requires a level of passion that few other sports can match (IMHO). Parker mentioned in his year-end review that he stuck with some players too long this year when they weren't bringing a consistent, passionate and professional effort to every practice, every game and every opportunity to represent Boston University, and if he had it to do it over again he would sit a few more guys down to send a message. Of course, he's said that before. And I suspect this was communicated to this year's group of players on more than one occasion. Sadly, a couple of players didn't get the message. But if his response to this recent episode is an example that things may be changing, we should all be for it.

I do applaud JP for this move. I really didn't think he had the courage.
I am certainly impressed. Players that are not for the team first, do nothing but hurt the team. The championship team was the epitome of a TEAM. Last season, there were several players with one foot out the door and others that were not on-board with the team concept. 27 was certainly one of them. Go BU!
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

Without having any immediate knowldege of the situation... my guess is that those were probablly just the icing on the cake.

I could be mistaken, but I was under the impression that the bike ride was punishment for an earlier drinking infraction. So he showed up late to his own punishment. The incident during the playoff's may have been the straw that broke the camel's back, three strikes and your out....
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

I could be mistaken, but I was under the impression that the bike ride was punishment for an earlier drinking infraction. So he showed up late to his own punishment. The incident during the playoff's may have been the straw that broke the camel's back, three strikes and your out....

I agree with you. I'm also going to watch out for lightning and stray flying pigs on my way home from work.
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

Wasn't his suggestion just that Saponari wasn't booted for the drinking incident? If that's true, was he booted for being late to a team bike ride (were coaches present or did someone rat him out?)

Or something else?

About this bike ride...

1. Was there a sufficient number of transgressors of team rules that the entire team was required to participate in the bike ride?
2. Were there just a few transgressors and JP policy is to punish the entire team for the sins of the few?
3. Was the bike ride only required of the transgressors?
4. Is one of the assistants required to drive a car alongside the bike riders in the manner of the pace boats for crew teams rowing on the Charles?
 
Last edited:
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

Drinking rules and bike rides are likely just surface incidents, folks. Those kinds of things can be fixed with game suspensions if a coach wants to keep the player around. Otherwise, they serve as great cover for booting players who don't fit Parker's team vision.

Parker has been around long enough to know what kind of players he wants to have on his teams, and he likely doesn't want bad apples to spoil the good apples.
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

About this bike ride...

1. Was there a sufficient number of transgressors of team rules that the entire team was required to participate in the bike ride?
2. Were there just a few transgressors and JP policy is to punish the entire team for the sins of the few?
3. Was the bike ride only required of the transgressors?
4. Is one of the assistants required to drive a car alongside the bike riders in the manner of the pace boats for crew teams rowing on the Charles?

It sounded like the entire team was biking because of a few. It was probably to get the captains and team to take charge of their team. Kind of link in the military when every one does push ups because of one yahoo
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

I don't get where people are implying that "good players" get away with more.... It is sad to admit, but from where I'm looking Vincent is (was) arguably the best returning player.

If you're responding to one of my posts Mookie perhaps I wasn't very clear. I used the phrase "talented" player. It's hard to argue that Vinny and Corey aren't two of the most "talented" players. So I was suggesting that one or two college boy mistakes in the course of a season wouldn't have resulted in the discipline that was handed down. “Over a period of time, there have been cumulative instances in which Victor and Vinny Saponari have displayed conduct unbecoming of a Boston University hockey player,” Terriers coach Jack Parker said in a news release. The accent in that quote should be on cumulative. Somewhere in there was the straw that broke the camel's back. And while it's one thing to dismiss Victor from the team, I gotta believe that the decision on Vinny was much, much tougher for Parker to make. (maybe that's why the first reports suggested a suspension for Vinny???) So if Parker was sending a message to his team I figure he wanted Corey to hear it loud and clear.
 
Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect

JP anticipated that Walshie would be an unspeakably bad commentator during NESN broadcasts and punished him in advance for it.

icon14.gif


I agree with you. I'm also going to watch out for lightning and stray flying pigs on my way home from work.

icon14.gif
icon14.gif


I agree, YOU are the one worth making jokes over.

icon14.gif
icon14.gif
icon14.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top