Re: Boston University 2010-11 Part III - Is That So Much To Ask?
Ha, I assume you mean NMU? I could be wrong, but I can't remember a more lopsided FF game since that BU/LSSU national title game.
Well, ya, but the flip side of this what if game is what if 2009 didn't happen.
I think the difference is UNH has no history to fall back on. BU obviously does and that plays a role in higher expectations. Do you really want your historic program compared to UNH? UNH now hasn't been to a FF since 2003 (I believe the year they last won HE as well). So, I'm not sure if they're almost always a national contender/constant threat to do damage in the tournament. Same for BU. I don't think that's accurate.
And, like I said, due to the nature of a one-and-done tournament, you have near-misses when you should have wins (LSSU, anyone?).
Ha, I assume you mean NMU? I could be wrong, but I can't remember a more lopsided FF game since that BU/LSSU national title game.
And Mookie, I'm going to venture a guess that, were BC not coming off a national championship, this conversation would be a lot more muted.
Well, ya, but the flip side of this what if game is what if 2009 didn't happen.
A second question to the anti-Parkerites: would you consider the UNH teams failures? They've had a success rate similar to BU (2009 not withstanding), and both programs are almost always national contenders, top Hockey East programs, and constant threats to do damage in the tournament.
I think the difference is UNH has no history to fall back on. BU obviously does and that plays a role in higher expectations. Do you really want your historic program compared to UNH? UNH now hasn't been to a FF since 2003 (I believe the year they last won HE as well). So, I'm not sure if they're almost always a national contender/constant threat to do damage in the tournament. Same for BU. I don't think that's accurate.