This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
). Vermont is just one of those tricky Hockey East teams that you better play your best against or else.BU will actually play 4 games without their "top 3" - they won the first two and tied Vermont (which I believe BC did as well even with all players
I actually think it is good for these top teams to play even if they don't have a full team. You can't be overly reliant on 1 or 2 players, otherwise you get complacent.
Who else was missing besides Molly?
Are we turning this into a Brown thread where everything is a fuzzy fantasy?
So two players and one of them is a frosh? In other words, Molly is the team (suprise!). BC always plays crappy without her between the pipes. And it doesnt really matter what kind of girls are being recruited if King can't get her crap together (suprise again!).
Nice to see the old RStarr back.So two players and one of them is a frosh? In other words, Molly is the team (suprise!). BC always plays crappy without her between the pipes. And it doesnt really matter what kind of girls are being recruited if King can't get her crap together (suprise again!).
So two players and one of them is a frosh? In other words, Molly is the team (suprise!). BC always plays crappy without her between the pipes. And it doesnt really matter what kind of girls are being recruited if King can't get her crap together (suprise again!).
Missing two players, one being Molly, and the other being a frosh, isn't "playing shorthanded" unless your team is, well, Molly. BC should have better results with the remaining players they had. I am not surprised by the results and I doubt anyone who has followed this team for more than a season was either. I almost responded to your earlier remarks questioning how the team would hold up without Molly as its just too predictable. And I'm not comparing BC to anybody but BC.
The past performances speak for themselves. BC has no confidence without her.
No need for glaze. King does an excellent job of bringing in top players. King does an an equally ****ty job at making anything come of that. You can have "one, two, three or more" top players and it doesn't mean anything if you have no strategy and clearly she has no formidable strategy. She has/had plenty of "top players"to work with these past few games (and seasons, etc).
I find this funny coming from someone who has gone to fewer BC games over the last few years than probably anyone who has posted in this thread, including ARM who has probably seen the 3 games BC has played against the Gophers in Minneapolis.
are you insinuating that what I am saying isnt ture?
I'm saying your opinions regarding the abilities of the players and coaches are pretty worthless as you never see any BCWH games.
Subjectively, that would make your opinion of my opinion equally worthless as you don't know me and really have no idea what I've seen. Furthermore, my argument contains objective criteria.
BC has (and has had) more than just one to two top players.
