Re: Big Ten Hockey Conference
I could be very wrong, but I can't see the formation of a BTHC with no non-BT teams in the mix. 6 teams even with the name brand just doesn't seem to carry much imho and would make for a crappy pre-NCAA post-season.
I agree, which is why I tend to think there will be concurrent conferences, at least to begin. The issue I see is that with 6 BT schools having teams, it makes it much more likely that other BT schools will decide to seriously explore adding hockey. If they get up to 8, I don't see how a full-fledged Big Ten Conference doesn't emerge.
As it stands right now, my feeling is that most of the 5 current programs wouldn't be in favor of leaving their present leagues. From what I have gathered, the Big Ten
could mandate such a change, but...if 4-5 of these schools
really don't want it to happen, it's hard to believe that it would.
As for those who think the MN legislature may step in to keep MN in the WCHA, you are fooling yourselves. Yes, the state got involved with alcohol at TCF Stadium, but that is/was a much different situation. Alcohol consumption by minors and young college students carries consequences well outside of athletic prowess and financial gains (perhaps many of you aren't aware of the rather capricious riot that broke out in the Spring of '09 at UMTC - or the numerous problems at some of the other, smaller state schools due to excessive drinking - but I'm sure you all remember hearing about Dinkytown after the 2002 and 2003 Gopher National Championships).
While many of the economic ramifications brought up are valid, I highly doubt those in the MN congress have considered or will consider this issue as thoughtfully as some of us on these boards. That's not a knock on the aptitude of MN's elected officials. It is just to say I don't think they have the interest level in or knowledge of collegiate hockey to reach the same conclusions.