What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

Hello! I am not dead. Hooray.

I was able to kind of process everything from last night so I'll just kind of put all my thoughts here rapidfire. I'm not sure how tl;dr this will be so apologies in advance.

--Man. That sucks.

--First off, it was so so so so so so SO great to hang out with my friends. I know CT seems like a brisk walk away from Boston for you midwestern elitists (:D) but I haven't been able to get up to see everyone and hang out for a long time (more than just game time) in what feels like years. Was able to hang out with Joe pretty much the entire day whooping him in pool, met Arthur Bailin from the Heights who was just awesome and fit right into our crew, and then hung out with them, DogHouse, and wwyte after the game for a pretty long time too. I got home at 2:30am and it was absolutely worth it.

--My biggest frustration by far came off the ice. BC did not send a band, which as Wisconsin fans know, is total BS, but even more frustrating is that they have send the band to the Beanpot final every single year that I can remember. The new band leadership elected not to go to any women's games this year at all in the beginning of the season, and when requested of them for the Beanpot, as the #1 team in the country and undefeated, they declined again. That's an embarrassment.

So, I brought my trumpet, like I've done for 9 years and have never had a problem. Well, Harvard had a problem with it. A TeamOps Nazi came up and very confrontationally told me I was not allowed to play. I explained that I've never had a problem before, and have brought it to Harvard many times before, and haven't had a problem. I asked him what if I got permission from BC to represent the band, and he told me"BC has no authority, this is not BC's house." Obnoxious.

So I found the BC SID who was happy to run up to Harvard ops and get their OK. Harvard Ops, I am completely flabbergasted to say, said absolutely not. I had her ask again, further explaining the situation, expressing my frustration that someone is trying to show support and enthusiasm for this sport and maybe it would be a good idea not to try and snuff that out, she went back up, and apparently it went all the way up to Joe Bertagna (Harvard alum!who said absolutely not, no noisemakers, bands only.

Needless to say I'm frustrated and want to thank Harvard for doing their absolute best to stay true to the Harvard way by being total douchnozzles. Veri****ingtas, assholes.

--On the ice. The first 8-9 minutes of the game were freaking nuts. BC came out like the Soviets in their prime and frankly it's a miracle it wasn't 5-0 before Harvard decided to show up. BC had I think the first 8 shots of the game, all in the first like 6 minutes.

Then it got considerably closer from there. Harvard settled down I guess and put a ton of work into getting bodies and sticks in the slot and snuffing us out. I was very impressed.

--I haven't yet put together the recap, it'll be tonight because I have to work (leaving in errrr 30 seconds), but the 2nd Harvard goal was a defensive breakdown the likes of which I don't think I've ever seen out of BC. Yikes. The first and the third if memory serves Burt was able to make the save but Harvard got to the rebound first. So depressing.

-Having said that, I don't think either BC goal was all that great. For all the talk of Maschmeyer keeping Harvard in it at the end, she was a sieve on those two goals. Nice shots, yes, but I was surprised that both went in.

--The 3rd period I thought BC played really well. I can't believe they didn't tie it, they created all of the chances.

--I'm didn't think the refereeing was the worst I've ever seen. There were a couple awful calls against BC but otherwise it went both ways. The couple calls I'm referring to are the 5 minute major (that was just ludicrous) and the icing at the end of the game called against BC while on the penalty kill that ended the game prematurely.

--WOW. What an atmosphere. Outside of last year's championship that was easily the best atmosphere for a women's game I've ever personally attended. BC sent a bus of about 30-40 students who were LOUD and in it the whole game. Harvard's band was terrible and should still invest in a tuner, obviously, but they were as obnoxious (in a fun, raucous way) as ever. The rest of the crowd was a surprisingly even split between BC and Harvard, I thought.

--Man what a fun game. Crowd was nuts. I loved it. But man oh man does it suck to lose the streak, obviously, but also to have it be in the Beanpot. That really blows.

--Thanks for the kinds words for our team, everyone. Hopefully we can start a nice new 10 game streak this weekend.

I'm sure I'll have more thoughts but I'm about 10 minutes late for work. Oops.
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

Kind of agree with most of your synopsis of the game, TTT, except for giving credit to Harvard for their last to goals....BC well covered the front of the net on the 2nd goal, but it was a smart, team play by the player, Parker?, to move the puck to the open side, and chenge the angle of attack! Sorry I'm not as familiar with names on these teams, but IMHO, a real heads up play. On the 3rd goal, you have to give credit for the puck movement from Harvard's PP.....the one thing I've learned since '77', is that fans forget that both teams can play hard, and still lose! You know this TTT, so while it hurts, not as much as when UNH lost to UMD in the national semi's though, I like Pfalzer, thought for sure she had the game-tying goal in the last minute. Just a real good hockey game!!
Hopefully the sport was able to garner more fans from such a great exhibition, while being on ESPN3....that game was everything you could hope for to represent the best of women's hockey!!
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

That was a great game! This might be a good thing for the Eagles and a bad thing for the other teams in the NCAA Tournament. Coaches who have been on a streak often times wish to get off from it, both winning & losing.
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

Kind of agree with most of your synopsis of the game, TTT, except for giving credit to Harvard for their last to goals....BC well covered the front of the net on the 2nd goal, but it was a smart, team play by the player, Parker?, to move the puck to the open side, and chenge the angle of attack! Sorry I'm not as familiar with names on these teams, but IMHO, a real heads up play. On the 3rd goal, you have to give credit for the puck movement from Harvard's PP.....
I think we're talking about different goals -- Harvard's first and third goal were good hard work out of the Crimson. The second was just awful, awful, awful, AWFUL from BC. I'll have GIFs tonight, eventually (my memory on which goal was which could be totally off). How do you leave a player that open 5 feet in front of the net?

Does anyone know what the review was for on Harvard's first goal?

Also I haven't left for work yet because my car is stuck in a snowbank :(
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

I think we're talking about different goals -- Harvard's first and third goal were good hard work out of the Crimson. The second was just awful, awful, awful, AWFUL from BC. I'll have GIFs tonight, eventually (my memory on which goal was which could be totally off). How do you leave a player that open 5 feet in front of the net?
No, you're correct. BC was too aggressive down low and the two players who were high didn't collapse.
Does anyone know what the review was for on Harvard's first goal?
I think it may have gone in off a skate based on how long they reviewed it. My guess is that there was no kicking motion so it was allowed to stand.
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

Kind of agree with most of your synopsis of the game, TTT, except for giving credit to Harvard for their last to goals....BC well covered the front of the net on the 2nd goal, but it was a smart, team play by the player, Parker?, to move the puck to the open side, and chenge the angle of attack! Sorry I'm not as familiar with names on these teams, but IMHO, a real heads up play. On the 3rd goal, you have to give credit for the puck movement from Harvard's PP.....the one thing I've learned since '77', is that fans forget that both teams can play hard, and still lose! You know this TTT, so while it hurts, not as much as when UNH lost to UMD in the national semi's though, I like Pfalzer, thought for sure she had the game-tying goal in the last minute. Just a real good hockey game!!
Hopefully the sport was able to garner more fans from such a great exhibition, while being on ESPN3....that game was everything you could hope for to represent the best of women's hockey!!


I may be goalie bias but Harvard won because their goalie was better...much better. if you look at the 10-2 game their goalies were not.
she played out of her mind and deserved to win the game and awards. Congrats to her.
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

I think we're talking about different goals -- Harvard's first and third goal were good hard work out of the Crimson. The second was just awful, awful, awful, AWFUL from BC.(
Yes, a terrible defensive breakdown. I recall three BC players all moving towards the Harvard puck carrier (Laing) in the corner. In the process they left Heffernan ALL ALONE in front. But give credit to Harvard for taking advantage - a perfect pass and a great move to beat Burt, who was left to defend all by herself.
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

I think we're talking about different goals -- Harvard's first and third goal were good hard work out of the Crimson. The second was just awful, awful, awful, AWFUL from BC. I'll have GIFs tonight, eventually (my memory on which goal was which could be totally off). How do you leave a player that open 5 feet in front of the net?

Does anyone know what the review was for on Harvard's first goal?

Also I haven't left for work yet because my car is stuck in a snowbank :(

By having the 3 players, as D2D mentions, move toward the puck carrier. In particular both defensemen, #4 included, vacating the front of the net.
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

By having the 3 players, as D2D mentions, move toward the puck carrier. In particular both defensemen, #4 included, vacating the front of the net.
Well I mean I know that's how it happened x's and o's but I meant more of a HOWWWWWWWWWWWWW WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

it would be interesting to see how many losses BC would have if they played UND, UMD, OSU, WI, and BSU four times each
essentialy, it's like playing in 8 Beanpots
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

TTT, not surprising you ran into trouble at Harvard. Had they allowed you to play, be it a trumpet or kazzoo, it would have revealed how terrible their band is by comparison.
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

it would be interesting to see how many losses BC would have if they played UND, UMD, OSU, WI, and BSU four times each
essentialy, it's like playing in 8 Beanpots

I agree...I would also like to see how many more losses UMD, UND, OSU, WI and BSU would have as well. I think BC would knock UND and Wisc out of the tournament.

P.S. I don't like BC but this team is a wagon
 
Last edited:
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

I agree...I would like to see how many more losses UMD, UND, OSU and BSU get as well. I think BC would knock UND and Wisc out of the tournament.

P.S. I don't like BC but this team is a wagon

BC looks unbeatable when they play teams that incorporate the "pylon" defense. Standing around and admiring BC's skating ability is a sure way to get smoked. It gets a bit more interesting for BC when there is more resistance to their free flowing game. BC's defensive prowess lies in their offensive ability to pressure and to maintain puck control, which their defensemen become an integral part of. This becomes a bit of a dilemma when non "cupcake" teams start to generate some of their own offensive zone pressure and all of a sudden the freedom that BC's defensemen enjoy in "cupcake" mode can become a liability.
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

it would be interesting to see how many losses BC would have if they played UND, UMD, OSU, WI, and BSU four times each
essentialy, it's like playing in 8 Beanpots

don't flatter yourself...Dartmouth would beat all of those teams...as would Princeton, Yale, Harvard, Quinny, SLU, BU, Northeaster and even Maine on a good day.

GOD I hope we play this year
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

it would be interesting to see how many losses BC would have if they played UND, UMD, OSU, WI, and BSU four times each
essentialy, it's like playing in 8 Beanpots

A couple weeks ago, after Wisconsin had finished the series against Clarkson, I was looking at the Pairwise and what possibilities there might be. I thought to myself:

"Tough part of the schedule behind Wisconsin... Minn, Bemidji, Clarkson on consecutive weekends... only five or six TUC games left to go".

Then I looked at BC's schedule and thought:

"Tough part of their schedule still to come... Princeton, Harvard, BU two or three times... still five or six TUC games left to go."
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

don't flatter yourself...Dartmouth would beat all of those teams...as would Princeton, Yale, Harvard, Quinny, SLU, BU, Northeaster and even Maine on a good day.

GOD I hope we play this year


Last year, Nov 2013, Wisconsin played Northeastern and BU on consecutive nights, at a neutral site (Vail, CO). UW beat Northeastern 3-2, and BU 5-0.

(Edit: and then beat Harvard in the NCAA quarterfinals, 2-1. Tight game. Could have gone either way.)
 
Last edited:
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

Last year, Nov 2013, Wisconsin played Northeastern and BU on consecutive nights, at a neutral site (Vail, CO). UW beat Northeastern 3-2, and BU 5-0.

(Edit: and then beat Harvard in the NCAA quarterfinals, 2-1. Tight game. Could have gone either way.)

Northeastern was leading that game with less than 10 minutes to go in the game. Easily could've gone the other way.
 
Re: BC Women's Hockey '14-'15: #SOAR

don't flatter yourself...Dartmouth would beat all of those teams...as would Princeton, Yale, Harvard, Quinny, SLU, BU, Northeaster and even Maine on a good day.

GOD I hope we play this year

Probably misunderstanding this but if it was Pokechecker against Ted Knight? I'd pay to see that. ;)
 
Back
Top