One further comment on the Minnesota-UMD comparison:
The biggest differences between the teams are:
(1) UMD was better against North Dakota
(2) Minnesota was better by 1 point in the overall WCHA schedule + QFinals + Semi, against a tougher quarterfinal opponent too, who were all common opponents
(3) Minnesota played in the WCHA game and lost
(4) Minnesota went 5-0 against a schedule that included two games against RPI top 12 Harvard, while UMD went 2-0 against UConn
To me it's clear Minnesota has a higher RPI because (2) and (4) matter more than (1) and (3) there, and any advantage UMD gets in the record vs. RPI top 12 because of (1) is nullified to some degree by (4), and that Minnesota should win the comparison.
Of course any normal person looking at the teams would just say Minnesota won the WCHA semifinal and should be seeded higher, but that's not what the NCAA does.
No, UMD was the #2 seed.
perhaps another consideration surrounding a bc/bu matchup is that it insures representation from Hockey East in the Frozen 4. Need to continue to grow the sport and breadth is as important as depth.
UMD was 5th in 2009 and won at UNH. They won at Erie in 2007 when the Lakers were #1.Forgive my memory, but who was it from the WCHA that travelled East last year and beat either BC or UNH ?. Or was that two years ago ?.
Dave, Just like to a say a big thanks for all your detailed postings and analysis. Simply fantastic for the less initiated on this subject. Learning lots.
OnMAA
The problem I have with that is that it just doesn't feel like much of a national tournament then. Any opponent that Mercyhurst draws will be something different for you. But if Syracuse was roughly equivalent to MC, then you wouldn't want the Lakers and Orange to be matched for a 6th time in your first NCAA game. How does one grow the sport if many of the marquee games taste like leftovers..... and if Minnesota should play Duluth and/or BC playing BU, then so be it...
I've already expressed this sentiment but yes, agree with the two previous posters. I'm sure we'd all like to see some of the other talented players that we normally don't get a chance to see.
You got that right!Wowwww... Wisconsin got hosed.
Amen...and counting...How has the committee screwed up, let me count the ways...failure to reward the #1 team, rematch of ECAC final (4th time they've played), very little diversity in quarterfinal matchups...what else?
Forgive my memory, but who was it from the WCHA that travelled East last year and beat either BC or UNH ?. Or was that two years ago ?.