What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2024 Elections: One Last Chance for Democracy

What’s sad is he still calls for Biden to resign at the end of the article and says Harris should take over to lead the fight…yeah, no.

It never ceases to amaze me how unbelievably stupid Democrats can be (and their knack for nominating horrible candidates -- Dukakis, Hillary). And their amazing "ability" to eat their own.
 
His Truth Social post denying it was most likely ghost written because it was grammatical correct, did not contain random capitalization, and contained the word abysmal which was spelled and used correctly.

Also, if he knows nothing about it, why does he disagree with parts of it? Also why does he wish them luck if he doesn't know anything about it?

He is literally named in it and his former staffer helped craft it so...
 
It never ceases to amaze me how unbelievably stupid Democrats can be (and their knack for nominating horrible candidates -- Dukakis, Hillary). And their amazing "ability" to eat their own.

Hillary was not a horrible candidate...people are horrible because they didn't vote for her for stupid reasons. She was literally right about everything but no one cared because they didn't like her for...reasons? All the things they didn't like about her they would have loved if it were her husband.
 
His Truth Social post denying it was most likely ghost written because it was grammatical correct, did not contain random capitalization, and contained the word abysmal which was spelled and used correctly.

Also, if he knows nothing about it, why does he disagree with parts of it? Also why does he wish them luck if he doesn't know anything about it?

Keep pushing back on it. He wouldn't be trying to (falsely) distance itself if something wasn't telling them it's bad.
 
Hillary was not a horrible candidate...people are horrible because they didn't vote for her for stupid reasons. She was literally right about everything but no one cared because they didn't like her for...reasons? All the things they didn't like about her they would have loved if it were her husband.

She had dogshit advisers who ran a dogshit campaign.
 
Hillary was not a horrible candidate...people are horrible because they didn't vote for her for stupid reasons. She was literally right about everything but no one cared because they didn't like her for...reasons? All the things they didn't like about her they would have loved if it were her husband.

jfc
 
Hillary was not a horrible candidate...people are horrible because they didn't vote for her for stupid reasons. She was literally right about everything but no one cared because they didn't like her for...reasons? All the things they didn't like about her they would have loved if it were her husband.

Thank you. I am so fucking sick of hearing people say she was a terrible candidate
 
Hillary was not a horrible candidate...people are horrible because they didn't vote for her for stupid reasons. She was literally right about everything but no one cared because they didn't like her for...reasons? All the things they didn't like about her they would have loved if it were her husband.

Which means she was a horrible candidate. If you are unelectable, it doesn't matter whether you could have been the greatest president in the world, you are a horrible candidate, by definition. It's all about winning an election. Nothing else matters. The Democrats don't get that. The GOP always has -- how else do you explain Reagan, Busch II, Trump?
 
afb070524dAPR-800x0.jpg
 
Which means she was a horrible candidate. If you are unelectable, it doesn't matter whether you could have been the greatest president in the world, you are a horrible candidate, by definition. It's all about winning an election. Nothing else matters. The Democrats don't get that. The GOP always has -- how else do you explain Reagan, Busch II, Trump?

Blaming her for the stupidity of voters is not how I would play it...
 
Blaming her for the stupidity of voters is not how I would play it...

Again. Does. Not. Matter.

You keep coming up with excuses. That's all they are. Excuses.

If you can't win, you can't win. Period. Figure out a way to win. And putting up Harris instead of Biden is not the way to win. But like I originally said, the Democrats will find the stupid *ss solution and lose again. And people like you (and Kep) will keep coming up with "the voters are stupid" excuse. While the GOP laughs their way to the Oval Office.
 
And people like you (and Kep) will keep coming up with "the voters are stupid" excuse.

Who said voters are stupid re: Hillary? She was a horrible candidate. Elections are a popularity contest and Hillary literally lost to The Convict who will go down in history as the worst American who ever lived.

The voters didn't kill Hillary. Her delusions in running in the first place did. She could have been the chief advisor to whoever beat The Convict. Like somebody said: she was right about everything. But she forgot the first rule of all democracies: you have to have appeal. She was actively repellent.
 
Who said voters are stupid re: Hillary? She was a horrible candidate. Elections are a popularity contest and Hillary literally lost to The Convict who will go down in history as the worst American who ever lived.

The voters didn't kill Hillary. Her delusions in running in the first place did. She could have been the chief advisor to whoever beat The Convict. Like somebody said: she was right about everything. But she forgot the first rule of all democracies: you have to have appeal. She was actively repellent.

https://x.com/thatallencovert/status/1809296918406934995s=61&t=Tm_QfNNi1j4RxxFX2KExbw
 
Again. Does. Not. Matter.


If you can't win, you can't win. Period. Figure out a way to win.

Does it matter how you define "can't?" She lost by a whisker and won the popular vote. She had some serious flaws, but it seems she could have won and was expected to, right up to election night. That doesn't change the fact that she lost, and it's not an excuse. But the label you place on her as one who can't win does not seem to fit. I didn't like her, btw, and still don't, but she was a legit candidate.

And before you come back at me with something smart, know that only stupid people ever think I'm wrong.
 
Back
Top