What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

As good as Halak was in the playoffs...at the end of it he was 9-9 and got yanked three times.

If I were St. Louis, I'd be concerned about his workload. I don't think he is a goalie capable of playing 70+ games. He's be best served with a back-up capable of playing 20 games or more.

I agree with this. That said, Halak has considerable potential and is going to a team with some talented young players like himself. St. Louis just has to be careful and only give him 55-60 games. Conklin had good stats for a backup and should be right over Halak's shoulder if he's not performing like he should.
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

Unlikely. Cocaine abuse can't be good for your heart. Even after you've quit.

On a sort-of-related, but kind of insensitive note: How long before you start replying to posts on this board by saying "over my dead body"?

Yesterday. It's not insensitive, unless you're talking about something Probert-related.
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

Canadiens announce they will are not interested in negotiating with Dominic Moore, Glen Metropolit, Paul Mara, or Marc Andre Bergeron. Metro and Moore will be missed; thank goodness MAB is gone and not coming back.

Good! He was a Bruins killer.
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

Alan Muir article



Bruins fans have to be hoping that Peter Chiarelli is paying attention. Unlike Bowman, who inherited his situation, Boston's fourth-year GM is dealing with a mess of his own making. In particular, a cap fine of $1.75 million next season because bonuses put the team over the limit by that same amount last season.

To his credit, Chiarelli has built a solid core of young talent in Boston. The problem is that the majority of these players are his guys...and that makes it considerably tougher to make the difficult choices. In an ideal world, Chiarelli would move veterans like Tim Thomas, Michael Ryder and Andrew Ference for picks and prospects. For that to happen, though, he'll likely need to include high-end sweeteners of his own -- say, Zach Hamill or one of next year's first rounders -- in order to convince another club to take on those salaries.

Chiarelli also wouldn't be opposed to shipping Marc Savard out of town. Rumors have been rampant since the draft that Boston was shopping its No. 1 center, a decision that seems odd considering his production (295 points in 309 games with the Bruins) and his very reasonable cap hit (just over $4 million). But there's a growing sense that this isn't just a case of addition by subtraction in terms of cap space.

Savard's standing within the room -- never that high to begin with -- took a serious hit in the wake of the too many men on the ice penalty that sealed Boston's Game 7 loss to Philadelphia in the second round of the playoffs. Instead of taking the blame he clearly earned with his indecisive play -- waving his stick to signal that he wanted to come off and then changing his mind, leaving the arriving Vladimir Sobotka on the ice just long enough to be whistled -- Savard initially tossed a flaming tire of responsibility around the young forward's neck. Savard later owned up, sort of: "I'll take blame if that's what it is." Not exactly the sort of leadership the team looks for from a veteran.

Chiarelli may yet be able to make a deal for Savard, but it's looking more likely that his cap mismanagement will cost the team a younger, more valuable asset, such as centers David Krejci or Patrice Bergeron or defender Mark Stuart. None of these players would solve the team's cap crunch by himself, but each would make for a compelling component of a larger swap. With Tyler Seguin and Joe Colborne pushing for a job in the middle, the B's have a position of strength at center to deal from. But if that's what it comes down to, it's to Chiarelli's discredit that the Bruins are forced to move pivotal pieces at such an early stage in their careers.
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

To his credit, Chiarelli has built a solid core of young talent in Boston. The problem is that the majority of these players are his guys...and that makes it considerably tougher to make the difficult choices. In an ideal world, Chiarelli would move veterans like Tim Thomas, Michael Ryder and Andrew Ference for picks and prospects.

Umm ya. Well, if Chiarelli didn't sign him to a three year extension which nobody saw coming...:mad:

Does anyone know what Savard's exact quote was about the too many men penalty? Maybe that's what sent Neely over the edge?
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

To his credit, Chiarelli has built a solid core of young talent in Boston. The problem is that the majority of these players are his guys...and that makes it considerably tougher to make the difficult choices. In an ideal world, Chiarelli would move veterans like Tim Thomas, Michael Ryder and Andrew Ference for picks and prospects.

Umm ya. Well, if Chiarelli didn't sign him to a three year extension which nobody saw coming...:mad:

Does anyone know what Savard's exact quote was about the too many men penalty? Maybe that's what sent Neely over the edge?

From espn.com:
"I was coming back and then no one jumped so I stayed on," Savard said. "I'm not sure what happened after that. I went back to get on the puck and then, I don't know."

Sobotka explained it this way:

"I don't really know. I just saw that Savvy was changing, and I heard my name, so I jumped on the ice and there were six guys on the ice.

"I thought he was coming for a change. I didn't see that he went back for the backcheck."

Sobotka didn't want to get into who called his name. It doesn't matter. Obviously more than one person thought Savard was getting a change and his decision to not hit the bench cost the Bruins.

If there was any question about who was at fault, coach Claude Julien cleared it up without criticizing anyone by name.

"We had a player come to the bench and had his stick up like he wanted to change, and he changes his mind and we had the next centerman jumping on," Julien said. "So they made that call."
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

Eh, that doesn't seem nearly as bad as I thought it would be. Savard didn't mention anybody by name and didn't directly blame Sobotka. Would it have been better for him to take full responsibility? Absolutely, but is that quote somehow the reason they want to move him?
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

Neither Ference nor Thomas are likely to go anywhere as their contracts give them negative value and Ference was just extended (inexplicably, I might add). Ryder has some value for a team that needs some forward depth. Sure, his scoring touch is mostly gone, but he played very good two-way hockey last year and despite his $4 million cap hit, it's an expiring contract for a team looking for a quick stop-gap, or a team like the Islanders who might need to get above the minimum (heard some chatter on the NHL Network aboot this).


The Savard stuff, though, I think is dead in the water. Despite a few reports from the Toronto media claiming they were going to get him and a few idiot reporters in Boston parroting those same rumors, it's all been pure speculation with nearly nothing to back it up. Sure, Neely fanned the flames with his comments a little and we have the words of the doddering old fool who used to ruin (sorry, I mean run) this team from a few years ago, but that's it. Usually where there's this much smoke there's fire, but I think (and hope) that this is all pure, unadulterated media bull****.
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

Ryder has scored 54 goals in two years with the Bruins (playoffs included).

He's not the complete bum some people think he is. I don't expect him to match his 27 from two years ago, but I think he has more than 18 of last year in the regular season. I think he scores 22 this year.
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

Some updates from around the league today:

* Rob Niedermayer signs a 1 yr deal with Buffalo for 1.15M plus bonuses.

* Michal Nylander waived by the Capitals today. Cap hit of 4.875M (real salary this year is only 3M).

* Jeff Schultz reups in Washington; 4 yrs/11M.
 
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

That whole 4.875 goes towards their cap?

I believe that this is a move just to see if anyone claims him; similar to what we saw with Souray last week. My guess is that with that cap hit, he will go unclaimed. And he'll essentially be in limbo.

I'm not sure if Washington has any players left that filed for arbitration now that Schultz has signed. If they do, there's a possibility that if a deal does not get worked out between the club and the arbitration eligible player and it goes to hearing, that the Caps could then potentially buy out someone after the arbitration award.

Not sure if anyone else (GLM?) can add to my understanding of the post arbitration award buyout.

Edit: The other reason that they're doing this is that "loans" to another league (he was in the KHL last year IIRC) have to be negotiated each year, and I think he has to go through waivers first here in the NHL.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2010 NHL Off-Season: Sather is a dink

That whole 4.875 goes towards their cap?

They waived him to see if someone who desperately needed a wildly under performing and selfish #2 center would take him. His cap hit blows, but he's only due to be paid $3 million this season. If his cap hit was $3 million, I think someone would take a shot on him. As it is, no way.

The Caps have had him buried in the minors the last two years basically so the money doesn't hurt their cap. It was a brutally bad signing from the get-go for the Caps. The Oilers have to be thankful that he gave them the finger to sign in Washington. The Caps had Nylander loaned out to the AHL Griffins for a spell last year. He ended up playing for Jokerit in Finland for a few games last year.

The guy is basically radioactive at this point NHL-wise. If the Caps can bury his money again they'll be happy as I doubt anyone wants him.
 
Back
Top