What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

and that will do it
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

That's the series, folks.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

STUART!

Coming out of the box, he beats the far defenseman to the puck and goes down on a breakaway, putting it past Ilya.

4-1!
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Ouch. That should ice it.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

After the refs don't call anything after Zetterberg takes the net off, breakaway goal by Stuart and this is over.

I don't want to hear any complaining about the officiating for a while from the Wings. They historically get more calls than just about anybody. And they got a gift here.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Was that Brad Stuart or did The Doctor regenerate into someone wearing a Stuart jersey? Just a thought.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

bronconick said:
That should be 2 minutes on Zetterberg for delay.

Refs show lack of balls.
Click to expand...

The replay that FSD just showed made it look not as bad. Probably still should have been a call. It wouldn't have mattered. Put Phoenix on the power play and they couldn't score in a whorehouse with a fist full of C-notes.

Wings have nearly 40 shots through 2 periods. Bryzgalov is the only reason it's not 6-1 or 7-1.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Hammer said:
The replay that FSD just showed made it look not as bad. Probably still should have been a call. It wouldn't have mattered. Put Phoenix on the power play and they couldn't score in a whorehouse with a fist full of C-notes.
Click to expand...
MNS has an equal chance of getting laid as Phoenix does of scoring with a man advantage.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Bakunin said:
MNS has an equal chance of getting laid as Phoenix does of scoring with a man advantage.
Click to expand...

Actually, I'd be mighty tempted to put my money on MNS in that situation.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Terrierbyassociation said:
I don't want to hear any complaining about the officiating for a while from the Wings. They historically get more calls than just about anybody. And they got a gift here.
Click to expand...

funny-pictures-beaver-cant-hear-you.jpg


And I thought it was the Habs who always get the calls? :D
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

I'll refrain from making any Bertuzzi knock out jokes. :D :D
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Every time Bertuzzi scores a post-lockout goal, God kills a kitten.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

OK, I'll admit when it was 4-1 at intermission, I said that Phoenix wasn't done yet and "it ain't over 'till it's over".

They're done now. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top