What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

World Soccer XXX: We Have Men Too!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait. How can you get other stuff but not the major networks?

mookie watches us tv through his brothers stream.
major networks require you to be IN the house. Using the house Wi-Fi.
think cause those are local channels vs the cable channels, which are national.
 
Guessing foreign cable companies will carry US cable channels but not US networks?

mookie used to steam be-In for the prem coverage. But whatever service that was was dropped a couple years ago. Mookie never bothered to re up as it was spotty. Would drop out all the time. More trouble that it was worth.
 
Decided to loosen the purse strings and get Peacock premium for $4.99 a month so I can watch Brighton until the season ends in May. I figure it won't break me but the grandkids get nothing for a few months.
 
Decided to loosen the purse strings and get Peacock premium for $4.99 a month so I can watch Brighton until the season ends in May. I figure it won't break me but the grandkids get nothing for a few months.
Typing with one hand while patting myself on the back with the other. I have internet through Xfinity and they have Flex which is a streaming box they offer at no charge for 1; any others are $5 month, and Peacock premium is free.
 
mookie's middle son sent a streaming website with sports, so we are good to go with the toon today. vpn locked and loaded :-)
 
Because they have their own networks instead?

Not like US cable companies carry the ABC from Australia or the broadcast version of the BBC. Or frankly, even the CBC outside of some northern border areas.
When I lived in Tacoma the cable company there had CBUT out of Vancouver. I was excited to finally be able to watch Hockey Night in Canada.
 
The massive jumble of broadcasting rights and streaming services makes me the days when nearly everything was on either Fox Sports World or ESPN.
 
Our local provider does not offer US networks - only cable but I haven't had cable for 3 years. Plenty of ways to find quality content via streaming options.
 
In the continuing saga of Juventus drama, it now comes out that multiple players (nearly 40) agreed to have renounced wages during COVID stoppages instead paid out off the books. The players are facing 30+ day suspensions.

Weston McKennie is one of the players implicated.

Link
 
Also implicated is Chiellini, who apparently sent a WhatsApp message to the players saying “don’t talk about this to the media” and C. Ronaldo who deferred nearly €20 million.
 
How can anybody be this bad at tax fraud? Don't they hire good criminal accountants?
The sad part is that Juventus is one of the better run Italian clubs and really the only one with a modern, clean stadium.

There’s a reason why Italy has missed the last two World Cups.
 
I understand that by rule that was a hand ball but that just seems incredibly harsh. Still 0-1 Newcastle. Looking very good for the Magpies going back to St James Park for the second leg and then a Cup final for the first time since 1976.
 
I understand that by rule that was a hand ball but that just seems incredibly harsh. Still 0-1 Newcastle. Looking very good for the Magpies going back to St James Park for the second leg and then a Cup final for the first time since 1976.
Um that’s not harsh, that’s pretty clearly defined:
It is an offence if a player:
• deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, for example moving the hand/arm towards the ball
• touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised
• scores in the opponents’ goal:
• directly from their hand/arm, even if accidental, including by the goalkeeper
• immediately after the ball has touched their hand/arm, even if accidental

That’s not even new.
 
Um that’s not harsh, that’s pretty clearly defined:


That’s not even new.

I understand the rule. I'm just saying as someone watching, given the situation, it was tough to see. It's not like Henry or Maradona deliberately handling the ball in an effort to deceive. It was a total accident. Like a goal scored this weekend that was waved off for offsides because the ball inadvertently deflected off a player who wasn't even looking at the play. I just prefer offense and hate when goals are disallowed because of things that are clearly unintentional.
 
Um that’s not harsh, that’s pretty clearly defined:


That’s not even new.

Just because the rule has been in place forever and is correctly applied doesn't inherently mean that the result is not harsh. Plenty of correct rulings still feel wrong. And that's fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top