TimothyA’s post sums up what I see as a cluster fiasco (or whatever) at D for the coming season.
In my view, Jungels-Harvey remains as one of the D lines. If not, I will need something stronger than beer in order to dampen my fan experience. My second D will line is Potter-Murphy, two highly regarded players who I think will prove to be a solid D pairing with added offensive punch as well. Looking to the future, I think the development of them as a pairing has to be an emphasis this season.
That leaves 4 players for the 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] line. Frankly, if MJ decided the team needed a portal transfer the choice of Wilgren mystifies me. Why not Morrow who was highly regarded out of SMS (with exceptional scorings stats for a F let alone a D), played a lot for OhSt, and has 3 years of eligibility left - and could have stabilized the D for 3 years. Markowski from Clarkson and Barnes from BC also were available in the portal. I would think playing for the Badgers with the chance for a ring would have had appeal to all of them. While it would be nice to know when Edwards decided to return for another season, and an explanation for all of this might prove of interest, it too might be another fan experience I don’t necessarily need.
So, for me, the coaches have to decide how they will distribute the playing time over 4 players. Helgeson could make things easier if she were to redshirt but she would have to recognize that Vesuvio will be coming next year as another highly regarded recruit who will require playing time and limit hers. But, if Helgesen were to red shirt, she still would have another year to get a chance at being the 6[SUP]th[/SUP] D.
As for playing 11 Fs to accommodate 7 Ds, I believe current rules on rosters allow 19 non Gs to suit for games. Regardless, 11 Fs doesn’t appeal to me. I strongly prefer to see a focus on developing all 12 of this season’s Fs.