PSUChamps2001
Member of the REAL Zoo Crew
I do believe that is the first thing Emory said that I agree with.
Oswego '88
Who?
I do believe that is the first thing Emory said that I agree with.
Oswego '88
Who?
... <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Lots of talk about polls out there; don't mean a thing; only guarantee is opponents now play harder and better against you <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23CardinalCountry&src=hash">#CardinalCountry</a></p>— Bob Emery (@emeryrd) <a href="https://twitter.com/emeryrd/statuses/407649217029885952">December 2, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Seems like Coach Emery knows what's going on on these message boards. Quick poll; Emory is a message board lurker, or he has a screenname?
Won't make the TBT game tomorrow, and I might well be happy that I decided to work instead: Salve Regina doesn't appear to be chopped-liver this season; Neumann needed 4 PP goals and OT to beat them.
Thus far, it isn't "business as usual" in D-3.
Tell me about it... This is the first time in a long time that the W's OOC W%/SOS is looking very pedestrian.
If Utica hopes to gain an NCAA berth this year, I predict that they're going to be obliged to win a ton of games vs. no-name opposition. (That's worked for Norwich for some time now in the ECAC-East, right?)
Let's not forget that the season is still young, but your point resonates in light of Wesleyan hammering Hobart... I certainly didn't see that one coming.
You better hope UW-point starts losing some games
At this point, the ECAC W teams are in trouble for Pool B.
Your OWP for games played within conference is always going to exactly 0.500. For your OWP to go up, your conference mates must win non-conference games and you must schedule your non-conference games against teams with winning records. Combining those two is what is required for a good OWP, which is 2/3 of the SOS measure (actually it accounts for about 80% of the variation in the SOS metric, because the standard deviation of OWP is twice that of OOWP, which make the ratio of effects about 4:1 instead of the 2:1 ratio people think it is). I could write a lot more on the topic, but the key for ECAC/W to get the Pool B over UWSP is going to be for all the teams to start winning NC games.
Tell me about it... This is the first time in a long time that the W's OOC W%/SOS is looking very pedestrian.
If Utica hopes to gain an NCAA berth this year, I predict that they're going to be obliged to win a ton of games vs. no-name opposition. (That's worked for Norwich for some time now in the ECAC-East, right?)
Let's not forget that the season is still young, but your point resonates in light of Wesleyan hammering Hobart... I certainly didn't see that one coming.
I predict that they're going to be obliged to win a ton of games vs. no-name opposition. (That's worked for Norwich for some time now in the ECAC-East, right?)
At this point, the ECAC W teams are in trouble for Pool B.
Your OWP for games played within conference is always going to exactly 0.500. For your OWP to go up, your conference mates must win non-conference games and you must schedule your non-conference games against teams with winning records. Combining those two is what is required for a good OWP, which is 2/3 of the SOS measure (actually it accounts for about 80% of the variation in the SOS metric, because the standard deviation of OWP is twice that of OOWP, which make the ratio of effects about 4:1 instead of the 2:1 ratio people think it is). I could write a lot more on the topic, but the key for ECAC/W to get the Pool B over UWSP is going to be for all the teams to start winning NC games.
Going further -- is the ECAC-W in trouble for Pool C?
It is possible - as always it depends on who doesn't win the dreaded conference tournaments. The fact is we traded the (original) NCHA slot for the Pool B slot, so the number of C's is still the same. In my rankings (unaudited) Utica is the top ranking ECAC W team, but their OWP is really bad - fueled by who they have played and the lack of OOC success by the rest of the ECAC W. So, in short yes, they could (for the first time since the Pool system started) be shut out of the NCAAs.
The good news that there is still time, but the ECAC W needs to stop losing to the SUNYACs to get whoever their top team is going to be. Only Hobart and Naz have decent OWPs, and that is based on who they have scheduled their NC games against (Naz is helped a lot by having played Adrian). Naz is going nowhere, but their OWP will contribute to everybody else's OOWp.
gee.....it is possible - as always it depends on who doesn't win the dreaded conference tournaments. The fact is we traded the (original) ncha slot for the pool b slot, so the number of c's is still the same. In my rankings (unaudited) utica is the top ranking ecac w team, but their owp is really bad - fueled by who they have played and the lack of ooc success by the rest of the ecac w. So, in short yes, they could (for the first time since the pool system started) be shut out of the ncaas.
The good news that there is still time, but the ecac w needs to stop losing to the sunyacs to get whoever their top team is going to be. Only hobart and naz have decent owps, and that is based on who they have scheduled their nc games against (naz is helped a lot by having played adrian). Naz is going nowhere, but their owp will contribute to everybody else's oowp.