1) Minnesota
2) Cornell
3) Clarkson
4) Wisconsin
5) Harvard
6) Boston College
7) Mercyhurst
8) Boston University
9) doesn't matter
10) no one cares anymore
1) minnesota
2) cornell
3) clarkson
4) wisconsin
5) harvard
6) boston college
7) mercyhurst
8) boston university
9) doesn't matter
10) RIT
1) RIT -- they're the only school that we're certain will end the season with a win.
2) North Dakota.
Well, them and Minnesota. lol
Yeah, for a withdrawal, so you can pay your bookieBU are taking Minnesota down. You can take that to the bank.
Not just one, but 7.1) RIT -- they're the only school that we're certain will end the season with a win.
Yeah, for a withdrawal, so you can pay your bookie
I honestly do not know the answer to this lolAdmit it TTT, would you not not love for BU to win over Minny and then Wisco so BC can have another crack at them ?
I think that we could do a final poll after the tournament. That provides some insight as to how fans think teams compare once all of the hockey is done for the season.Okay fine, no more poll. But would there be interest in a tourney bracket pool via Paypal?
I honestly do not know the answer to this lol
If you're hoping for a rematch with BU, that's puts them uncomfortably close to having more national championships than you've got, doesn't it?
I am absolutely NAHT hoping for a rematch with BU for that very reason. I am hoping for the easiest path to the title.If you're hoping for a rematch with BU, that's puts them uncomfortably close to having more national championships than you've got, doesn't it?
It might work that way a bit in men's hockey. In women's, it doesn't seem to matter. The best team seems to win and has to beat quality teams to do so. The quarter opponent might be a bit weaker some years, but after that all the opponents tend to be about the same in terms of potential. Either your team is good enough to win three straight or it isn't. The hockey gods don't do it for you.I want my team to win the title. They have a better chance of winning the title by playing the lowest ranked teams possible.
No, I assure you, if you play opponents that you statistically have a better chance of beating, then you will statistically have a better chance to beat those teams. It's freaking axiomatic.It might work that way a bit in men's hockey. In women's, it doesn't seem to matter.
I never said they did. But math and logic and reason say that if you play a worse team you will be more likely to win that game.The hockey gods don't do it for you.
You *KNOW* that isn't true. Last year BC had to play Minnesota in the semifinals. BU had to play, what, Cornell?, who was not in the same stratosphere as Minnesota, because no one was in the same stratosphere as Minnesota.The quarter opponent might be a bit weaker some years, but after that all the opponents tend to be about the same in terms of potential
If BC could play Sacred Heart, Holy Cross, Maine, and Brown for the title it wouldn't cheapen it for me in the slightest.