What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

Cali said:
Is there any way to block him through the USCHO website so that his posts don't exist?
Click to expand...
Each member can do that for themselves individually should they rather not see the postings of another via the ignore function.
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

TonyTheTiger20 said:
If any of you take the bait on that one I will be really disappointed...
Click to expand...

I'll actually take the bait, BUT NOT cause of the silly accusation, but BECAUSE Pokechecker crossed the line and violated USCHO posting rules by "editing in" comments I never made. I'll illustrate to make it real clear what Pokechecker did to cross the line:

I posted this at 8:40 PM Yesterday (Jan 28): (You can verify that I never edited my original post)

OnMAA said:
In your math method the natural separation between each placing is 4 points, so unless the point delta is more than 4 there should be no extra separation line. If applied it would remove three of the lines in the above order.
Click to expand...

Pokechecker then posted this in his/her post at 1:31 PM today (Jan 29):

OnMAA said:
In your math method the natural separation between each placing is 4 points, so if the point delta is less than 4 points, the ranking is inconslusive and the teams should be considered at an equal rank.
Click to expand...

The stuff in red was made up by Pokechecker and attributed to me. NOT COOL.

And by the way Pokechecker. My Education is not Canadian.
 
Last edited:
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

Pokechecker knows that. And he knew you would notice and knew you would respond like you did. You're doing exactly what he wants you to do.
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

OnMAA said:
I'll actually take the bait, BUT NOT cause of the silly accusation, but BECAUSE Pokechecker crossed the line and violated USCHO posting rules by "editing in" comments I never made. I'll illustrate to make it real clear what Pokechecker did to cross the line:

I posted this at 8:40 PM Yesterday (Jan 28): (You can verify that I never edited my original post)



Pokechecker then posted this in his/her post at 1:31 PM today (Jan 29):



The stuff in red was made up by Pokechecker and attributed to me. NOT COOL.

And by the way Pokechecker. My Education is not Canadian.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:

Pffft. You have quoted my posts with creative editing to completely and purposely alter the context numerous times.

Hello pot...meet kettle.
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

brookyone said:
:rolleyes:

Pffft. You have quoted my posts with creative editing to completely and purposely alter the context numerous times.

Hello pot...meet kettle.
Click to expand...

Never added or changed poster comments. There is a BIG difference.!!!
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

OnMAA said:
Never added or changed poster comments. There is a BIG difference.!!!
Click to expand...
Bull you haven't. Quoting edited posts of others...edited by you is changing the post. You've chopped up individual sentences of mine to create the bull doody context you wanted to create a number of times. Way to man up with your denial.
 
Last edited:
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

brookyone said:
Bull you haven't. Quoting edited posts of others...edited by you is changing the post.
Click to expand...

Disagree...Only quoting parts of a post vs editing in new comments never uttered in the first place is a completely different kettle of fish.

But, you and I always disagree on etiquette, so let's just leave it at that.
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

OnMAA said:
Disagree...Only quoting parts of a post vs editing in new comments never uttered in the first place is a completely different kettle of fish.

But, you and I always disagree on etiquette, so let's just leave it at that.
Click to expand...
More bull. Chopping up and editing individual sentences for the specific purpose of changing context doesn't fall under "only quoting part of a post" and you've done it more than once to posts of mine.

Let's leave it at that. The truth.
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

1. Minnesota
2. Wisconsin
3. Clarkson
4. Boston College
5. Harvard
6. Cornell
7. North Dakota
8. Robert Morris
9. Quinnipiac
10. Mercyhurst
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

ARM said:
1. Minnesota
2. Wisconsin
3. Clarkson
4. Boston College
5. Harvard
6. Cornell
7. North Dakota
8. Robert Morris
9. Quinnipiac
10. Mercyhurst
Click to expand...

Some big changes from your last Posters Poll, ARM, with Clarkson jumping both Cornell and North Dakota, each of which fall three places. :confused:

1. Minnesota
2. Wisconsin
3. Cornell
4. North Dakota
5. Clarkson (tie)
5. Boston College (tie)
5. Harvard (tie)
5. Robert Morris (tie)
9. Quinnipiac (by default)
10. Mercyhurst
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

D2D said:
Some big changes from your last Posters Poll, ARM, with Clarkson jumping both Cornell and North Dakota, each of which fall three places. :confused:

1. Minnesota
2. Wisconsin
3. Cornell
4. North Dakota
5. Clarkson (tie)
5. Boston College (tie)
5. Harvard (tie)
5. Robert Morris (tie)
9. Quinnipiac (by default)
10. Mercyhurst
Click to expand...

I agree with Arm....... I think Clarkson is the team from the East to watch. Have them ranked 3rd in my poll. They are trending in the right direction compared to Cornell and Harvard. They also have a more balanced line-up depth wise compared to Harvard and Cornell, and me thinks that can play a big role down the stretch.

As was mentioned by ARM in the Wed-Women report, HUGE game coming up with Harvard to possibly decide the ECAC reg season crown.
 
Last edited:
D2D said:
Some big changes from your last Posters Poll, ARM, with Clarkson jumping both Cornell and North Dakota, each of which fall three places. :confused:
Click to expand...
Many of the gaps are very, very small. I had a four-way tie for fifth last week. I'd move RMU up higher, but I wasn't impressed by the Colonials getting outshot 17-0 or whatever it was in the first period on Saturday. "Hello! Game started!"
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

I'm inclined to put pokechecker on my ignore list (by itself), but if I do, I won't understand why everyone is so grumpy.

Pokey - I take offense to some of the things you say about my friends. OnMaa happens to be a well mannered, reasonable, and yes, well educated person who is not German, and further more, even if you had the nationality right, does not deserve what you said. Go away and take a happy pill. Or at least a civil one.
 
Re: USCHO Women's Hockey Posters Poll

TonyTheTiger20 said:
POKECHECKER'S GOAL WAS TO MAKE YOU TAKE OFFENSE TO THlS. He is not serious. Why are you taking him seriously?
Click to expand...

People are trying to engage the poster who shall remain nameless with some sense of rationality which is sort of like peeing into the wind.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top