How have Maine and UVM done with their new coaches? Maybe there are good things to come but no end product yet.
I don’t see a new coach making much difference without other changes. Realistically you’re going to get someone like Ayers, Ellsworth, Dumais or maybe a retread like Dennehey or MacDonald. Do any of those get you hot and bothered?
I want Maine to be good again more than anything, but I understand why they’re not and it has nothing to do with the coach. It’s a poor school in a rural location. Shawn was a once in 1k lifetimes type happening. Those days have come and gone and at this point I think it’s much more productive to be appreciative they happened than be bitter they’re over.
Honestly if Barr could get Maine back to where Red had them in the middle of the pack I’d be happy. At this point I think it’s best realistic case but either way I’ll still watch them and cheer them on. You can’t have everything you want in life.
You think youre telling us about the landscape of college hockey, but youre only telling us about yourself...
College hockey has always been, still is, and always will be a sport where the 'poor, rural school' can and does compete with the P5 school when competence and effort collide. There are more than five candidates for head coaching jobs (there are 124 NCAA DI assistant coaches for starters). You've quit on being a fan, and now youre on some sort of wild crusade to excuse administrators who have done the same. Its obnoxious...
Minnesota State is the most successful school in the State of Hockey. Clarkson is on pace for its 7th 20-win season in the last 10 years. Long time also-rans have dominated the Hockey East landscape for the past several seasons. But tell us more how our lot in life is pre-destined and cannot be changed. Attitude and effort is everything in college sports, and its almost always why losers lose. (more often than not, its a direct result of talking oneself out of deserving to win before they even start the process)...
The rink shrink is the perfect example - it was UNH/Souza announcing to the world that THEY don't believe in the program. So, why would anyone else? If you believe, selling is easy. If you think your school is poor and rural with little to offer - forget about it.
Watcher has mentioned a few candidates - Casey Jones, Bill Muckalt, Dane Jackson, Peter Mannino, Kevin Dean, Jared DiMichel, Anthony Noreen, Fred Harbinson and, yes, Joe Dumais are a few more just off the top of my head. Imagine what a national search could turn up. Talk to these people and see who stands out versus anyone who sells the college hockey landscape the way you do...
And if you're so content with appreciating the old days - why do you spend so much time trying to convince everyone at UNH/UM to stoop to your level? Perhaps youre actually seeking validation for the decision you've made...
Last edited: