What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UND @ MN: Jan 15-16: Overly Hostile vs Underachieving

Re: UND @ MN: Jan 15-16: Overly Hostile vs Underachieving

Gophers take 3 points. I admit, this is more of a hope than a prediction.

An another note, could this be the last Gophers vs. sioux regular season matchup? Is the August 1st (or whatever it is) deadline still in effect for the und to drop the sioux nickname? If so, what is the leading candidate for the new name? Will they pick a new name at all, or will they go with just the und hockey team?

Maybe they could drop the name and just use a symbol like Prince.
 
Re: UND @ MN: Jan 15-16: Overly Hostile vs Underachieving

Minnesota should get in the act too since Prince is from Minnesota. They could use an empty seat.

Sioux Sweep
 
Re: UND @ MN: Jan 15-16: Overly Hostile vs Underachieving

Maybe they could drop the name and just use a symbol like Prince.
Like a raised middle finger?
Minnesota should get in the act too since Prince is from Minnesota. They could use an empty seat.

Sioux Sweep
For trying not to hijack this thread...Epic fail on my part.:o
 
Re: UND @ MN: Jan 15-16: Overly Hostile vs Underachieving

An another note, could this be the last Gophers vs. sioux regular season matchup?
It could be. Or not.

Is the August 1st (or whatever it is) deadline still in effect for the und to drop the sioux nickname?
The one deadline that's carved in stone is November 2010. That's the deadline in the NCAA lawsuit settlement for UND to obtain approval from both Sioux tribes in the state. The settlement doesn't require UND to drop the nickname if it doesn't have approval. The university can either change the nickname to something the NCAA likes or keep the Fighting Sioux nickname and be subject to the NCAA's policy against Native American nicknames and imagery.

There are some questions that have yet to be answered. Will the Standing Rock Tribal Council change its official policy against UND's use of the nickname, as the Spirit Lake Tribal Council did? Will the State Board of Higher Education change the name before the November deadline to help UND achieve membership in the DI Summit Conference? Will the group from Spirit Lake that filed a lawsuit to block the board from changing the name early file an appeal after the judge threw the case out?

There's a chance that the State Board of Higher Education could take action on the issue when it meets at UND Jan. 21. The expectation is that the Spirit Lake group will file an appeal with the North Dakota Supreme Court before then, effectively blocking the board from taking any action.

If so, what is the leading candidate for the new name?
Because nobody is officially discussing a new nickname, that's rather hard to say. There have been many suggestions. Some are liked better than others, but I couldn't say which is favored. Heck, I don't even know who will ultimately make the decision if the nickname changes. Some simply favor UND becoming "North Dakota."

Will they pick a new name at all, or will they go with just the und hockey team? What is the current status of that?
See above.
 
Re: UND @ MN: Jan 15-16: Overly Hostile vs Underachieving

I'd really like to have a halo.

Sioux Sweep
 
Re: UND @ MN: Jan 15-16: Overly Hostile vs Underachieving

If you call and ask, they'll say, <i>"We don't take reservations"</i>. But we all know that's crap. I see <b>Reserved</b> signs on tables all the time. So share the luv, man - what's the secret?

As opposed to..............

Might be the night you're trying. Some events they won't take reservations for so if that one is going on the same night (like a Twins playoff game) they won't take any reservations.

MNS is correct. For whatever reason, they don't consider UND/MN hockey a "game night," but if it's a big Vikes game or Twins game, they do consider that a game night, and no reservations would be taken.

For the last UND/MN series, that's the problem we ran into. If the Twins had played that weekend, our res would've been canceled.

Also, I think the min is 6 people (we always had at least 8, though, and added a couple extra spots, just in case). And definitely reserve it for about an hour ahead.
 
Re: UND @ MN: Jan 15-16: Overly Hostile vs Underachieving


I like the fact that Ness is getting recognized as a defenseman that can play against anyone ("we have 4 D-men that can play against anyone"). People may point to his lack of pts as being problematic, but I think he is the best all-around defenseman on the team. He carries the puck well, makes good decisions on the point, can feed well (if there were a few more goal-scorers on the squad I think his pt. total would be much greater at this point), and he is always in position defensively and almost never gets turned by forwards coming into the Gophers' zone. I have been very impressed with his play after the first month of the season.
 
Re: UND @ MN: Jan 15-16: Overly Hostile vs Underachieving

I like the fact that Ness is getting recognized as a defenseman that can play against anyone ("we have 4 D-men that can play against anyone"). People may point to his lack of pts as being problematic, but I think he is the best all-around defenseman on the team. He carries the puck well, makes good decisions on the point, can feed well (if there were a few more goal-scorers on the squad I think his pt. total would be much greater at this point), and he is always in position defensively and almost never gets turned by forwards coming into the Gophers' zone. I have been very impressed with his play after the first month of the season.

IMO Ness has not been spectacular this year. I question Lucia's decision to allow him to accelerate into the program when he should have spent at least a year in the USHL to develop his skills and physical stature. He simply does not have the physical prowess necessary to be a high impact defensivemen in this league right now. Fairchild IMO is the defensive catalyst on the team and he is struggling this year.

The Gophers need much more physicality from their defense if they hope to shut top teams down. IMO Lucia needs to rethink his recruitiing strategy and bring in more high impact players who are more physically and mentally prepared for D1. Taking players out of HS has not been successful for the program.

I watched Gopher recruit, Nate Schmidt, play a couple weeks ago and he moved the puck well, has a good defensive aptitude, solid physical stature at 6-0, 197, plus he possesses good offensive skills and has seven goals and 15 assists in 22 games for the Fargo Force. He seems like more of what the Gophers need.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top