What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

Re: UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

You sure are fixated on my earning power. You must be a girl looking to get knocked up so you can collect child support since you clearly show no evidence of intelligence or anything else related to actually making a living for yourself that doesn't involve whoring/pan handling.

Why don't you just steal the pull-tabs like one of your team's former goalies did once upon a time?

I'm actually just posting for your mom. She wants you to move out of the basement and get a real job! ;)
 
Re: UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

Just as soon as the train on your wife is over...;)

SiouxWagonTrain.jpg


Headin' for home...
 
Last edited:
Re: UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

I hate to be the one to steer the conversation back to hockey, but I do have to say that while it seems like the obvious prima facie interpretation, the notion that Michigan was outplayed and was bailed out by a few bounces and a hot goalie sells a great game short. Sure, starting in the second period when Michigan adopted a defensive posture UND started to dominate puck possession. It wasn't only Hunwick, though, who was responsible for the fact that UND couldn't translate that possession time into anything more substantive. Not to take anything away from the kid—a 40 save shutout is a 40 save shutout—but Michigan won the chess match with letter perfect team defense. Many of those 40 shots came from the perimeter because Michigan successfully contained the offensive threat by shutting down passing lanes and taking away quality opportunities.

I'm not usually a big fan of the protect-the-lead approach, but Michigan pulled it off beautifully tonight, and the glib storyline in which they were outplayed but saved by Hunwick's heroics glosses over what was, in fact, a hard fought and strategically interesting game.

Anyway, as a disinterested observer, that's my piece.
 
Re: UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

I hate to be the one to steer the conversation back to hockey, but I do have to say that while it seems like the obvious prima facie interpretation, the notion that Michigan was outplayed and was bailed out by a few bounces and a hot goalie sells a great game short. Sure, starting in the second period when Michigan adopted a defensive posture UND started to dominate puck possession. It wasn't only Hunwick, though, who was responsible for the fact that UND couldn't translate that possession time into anything more substantive. Not to take anything away from the kid—a 40 save shutout is a 40 save shutout—but Michigan won the chess match with letter perfect team defense. Many of those 40 shots came from the perimeter because Michigan successfully contained the offensive threat by shutting down passing lanes and taking away quality opportunities.

I'm not usually a big fan of the protect-the-lead approach, but Michigan pulled it off beautifully tonight, and the glib storyline in which they were outplayed but saved by Hunwick's heroics glosses over what was, in fact, a hard fought and strategically interesting game.

Anyway, as a disinterested observer, that's my piece.

I saw a LOT of individual battles won by the Sioux players. This more than anything usually determines the outcome of a game, but not tonight. The vast majority of board battles were won by the Sioux and Michigan seemed a step slow, even before they took the lead.

That game could have easily been 5-1 Sioux.

But give Michigan credit for hanging in there and getting the "W". In the end, that's all that matters.
 
Re: UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

I tend to agree, although Hunwick obviously was the star of the game.

What I actually though the most telling was UND had 6 PP's tonight (I think) and I cannot think of one scary moment in any of them. THAT was the game, imho.
 
Re: UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

I saw a LOT of individual battles won by the Sioux players. This more than anything usually determines the outcome of a game, but not tonight. The vast majority of board battles were won by the Sioux and Michigan seemed a step slow, even before they took the lead.

That's one of the reasons I found this to be such an interesting game. I entirely agree that in the one-on-one scrums UND usually came out with the puck. But they came out with the puck and no options, which is a testament to Michigan's positional play. UND won the puck possession game, but they lost the game away from the puck. That's not an easy feat to pull off, and Michigan deserves some credit for doing it so well.
 
Re: UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

I hate to be the one to steer the conversation back to hockey, but I do have to say that while it seems like the obvious prima facie interpretation, the notion that Michigan was outplayed and was bailed out by a few bounces and a hot goalie sells a great game short. Sure, starting in the second period when Michigan adopted a defensive posture UND started to dominate puck possession. It wasn't only Hunwick, though, who was responsible for the fact that UND couldn't translate that possession time into anything more substantive. Not to take anything away from the kid—a 40 save shutout is a 40 save shutout—but Michigan won the chess match with letter perfect team defense. Many of those 40 shots came from the perimeter because Michigan successfully contained the offensive threat by shutting down passing lanes and taking away quality opportunities.

I'm not usually a big fan of the protect-the-lead approach, but Michigan pulled it off beautifully tonight, and the glib storyline in which they were outplayed but saved by Hunwick's heroics glosses over what was, in fact, a hard fought and strategically interesting game.

Anyway, as a disinterested observer, that's my piece.

Exactly. This wasn't Michigan getting thoroughly outplayed. Michigan's gameplan was to play in a defensive posture and take advantage of offensive opportunities as they were presented instead of playing their typical high tempo transition game. It's a coaching strategy that is obviously paying dividends in the tournament with strong D-corp and goaltending they're getting this year.
 
Re: UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

I saw a LOT of individual battles won by the Sioux players. This more than anything usually determines the outcome of a game, but not tonight. The vast majority of board battles were won by the Sioux and Michigan seemed a step slow, even before they took the lead.

That game could have easily been 5-1 Sioux.

But give Michigan credit for hanging in there and getting the "W". In the end, that's all that matters.

If the Sioux would have gotten a lead, Michigan would have opened things up and gotten more than one goal.
 
Re: UND Fighting Sioux vs. UM Wolverines

That's one of the reasons I found this to be such an interesting game. I entirely agree that in the one-on-one scrums UND usually came out with the puck. But they came out with the puck and no options, which is a testament to Michigan's positional play. UND won the puck possession game, but they lost the game away from the puck. That's not an easy feat to pull off, and Michigan deserves some credit for doing it so well.

You make good points about having no options much of the time, however UND had 5-10 glorious chances that they flat out failed to convert on. In a game like tonight's, with very little breating room on the ice, your skill players need to be skill players and convert on the few chances they do get.

Again, props to Michigan for playing a winning strategy, but the NoDak players will be replaying those opportunities in their heads for quite some time.
 
Back
Top