What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

UML said:
Three of us are leaving Lowell area in 10 minutes! See everyone down there!!! Is it still law in CT that everyone in the car other than the driver can have open containers!?
Click to expand...
I don't believe that's true, but I'm not sure.
 
Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

Patman said:
Ignore him.... We are well rested... We will be tenacious... They will look beyond us. We will win.
Click to expand...

Probably a generic they, but this week has been so cordial thus far, that I just feel the need to claify that he isn't a Miami poster.
 
Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

UML said:
Three of us are leaving Lowell area in 10 minutes! See everyone down there!!! Is it still law in CT that everyone in the car other than the driver can have open containers!?
Click to expand...

Seriously, why chance it? You can't wait until you're parked in Bridgeport?
 
Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

J.D. said:
Hoky, do you think Miami is a lot better than BC?
Click to expand...

No I dont. The key here is not who is betetr but who matches up better. For example, PC can beat Lowell as they match up well. They dont though match up well with BC, even thouigh Lowell did well vs BC. Lowell does not match up well with Miami. Watch them, they are lights out fast and deep. Should never have been as far down the food chain as they were.
 
Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

Good luck Riverhawks. Would love to be able to see you in Tampa. Let's keep Miami hating Hockey East. :D
 
Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

Only saw a brief shot so far, but looks like a decent crowd for game #2...and looks like you have a good showing.
 
Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

J.D. said:
Only saw a brief shot so far, but looks like a decent crowd for game #2...and looks like you have a good showing.
Click to expand...

Looks more lively than the crowd in Green Bay for Denver and Ferris.

Miami does not look as good as I thought they were. Credit to UML. Credit also to Hockey East? If Miami really does have a talent edge, they look like they're not used to having to use it. UML had a long layoff also, but they were ready to go.

40 minutes is still a long time, though. I'll be curious to see if Miami can find another gear in the 2nd . . . b/c I don't expect UML to back off.
 
Last edited:
Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

Hokydad said:
No I dont. The key here is not who is betetr but who matches up better. For example, PC can beat Lowell as they match up well. They dont though match up well with BC, even thouigh Lowell did well vs BC. Lowell does not match up well with Miami. Watch them, they are lights out fast and deep. Should never have been as far down the food chain as they were.
Click to expand...

uh huh....
 
Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

Saw three moose. Saw the score was 3-0. Coincidence? maybe. Awesome? Yes.

Bob Ellis is on fire tonight.
 
Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part III

Good to see you guys continuing the tradition of HE teams ending Miami's season ;). One more period but I don't see you guys losing this lead.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top