Also, most contestants were likely educated urban dwellers in a country that was largely uneducated and rural.Advertising dollars hadn't molested radio stations just yet. The medium was new, no one yet knew there would be a race to the bottom chasing the almighty dollar.
Yes, it was a selected sample. Yes, the point of the show was different. But even if you compare a show like "wait, wait don't tell me, "which is ostensibly supposed to be reaching the intelligent tenth of the population now, the difference is staggering. They aren't ironic or winky or hip, they are just in love with knowledge. It's so much more substantial and real. They have not yet lost their existence to the Vast Insipid Meta-Cultural Vaporfield of... now.
What’s left at that point besides academics, history, and lit?
I'm looking forward to starting Ken Burns' Benjamin Franklin.
From Ep 1 - Even as far back as 1722 Franklin took aim at wealthy parents dreaming of sending their kids to Harvard writing: “Most of them consulted their own purses instead of their children’s capacities. At Harvard they learn little more than how to carry themselves handsomely and enter a room genteelly. And from whence they return after abundance of trouble in charge as great blockheads as ever. Only more proud and self-conceited”.
It was bad. I had it on while doing other thingsMy wife and I watched the Netflix series, Inventing Anna. It stars Julia Garner from Ozark.
I'm sorry, but that series is terrible. Way, way, way too long. The primary problem is that the core of the story, rich New Yorkers swindled out of millions by hustler(s), always seems so time-worn, even when true. It feels like the creator of the series felt that they had to add another angle to it, the story of the reporter who wrote the story. The problem is, that story isn't interesting, so it just drags things out.
I would definitely avoid if you haven't watched it yet.
It was bad. I had it on while doing other things