P
Priceless
Guest
I never believe anything that's written by you.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
- Status
I never believe anything that's written by you.
walrus
Wind up workin' in a gas station
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
yet you continue to read it and respond, I'm honored
yet you continue to read it and respond, I'm honored
P
Priceless
Guest
Don't be. I never said I ignored it. I said I didn't believe it.
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
Odd time for the census bureau to change how they collect data regarding health insurance statistics, making comparisons between pre-PPACA and post-PPACA insurance markets impossible because they changed the f^cking baseline. Typically if you introduce a radically different methodology you at least run both side by side for a few years. Unbelievable, now the Census Bureau has also been politicized too. Very sad.
Odd time for the census bureau to change how they collect data regarding health insurance statistics, making comparisons between pre-PPACA and post-PPACA insurance markets impossible because they changed the f^cking baseline. Typically if you introduce a radically different methodology you at least run both side by side for a few years. Unbelievable, now the Census Bureau has also been politicized too. Very sad.
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
Call off the black helicopters Fishy. If anything this benefits you knucks' as its more than clear to anybody with a brain that uninsured rates are dropping significantly. Now you bozos can claim its a methodology change to make you feel good while watching Hillary's Inaugural Address.
Call off the black helicopters Fishy. If anything this benefits you knucks' as its more than clear to anybody with a brain that uninsured rates are dropping significantly. Now you bozos can claim its a methodology change to make you feel good while watching Hillary's Inaugural Address.
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
10M newly insured according to Gallup!
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101588833
Seeing as they were dealing with about 40M eligible, covering a quarter of them in 6 months time is pretty **** good!
10M newly insured according to Gallup!
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101588833
Seeing as they were dealing with about 40M eligible, covering a quarter of them in 6 months time is pretty **** good!
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
With the advertising blitz they've had on taxpayers dime and the threat of fines/jail looming over you if you don't? Not sure 25% is something to be that proud of... assuming the numbers are valid of course.
With the advertising blitz they've had on taxpayers dime and the threat of fines/jail looming over you if you don't? Not sure 25% is something to be that proud of... assuming the numbers are valid of course.
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
Of course...because a polling outfit that had Mittens winning the election by 5% is clearly in the tank for Obama.
Of course...because a polling outfit that had Mittens winning the election by 5% is clearly in the tank for Obama.
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
Somehow I knew you'd focus on that instead of addressing my actual point.
Of course...because a polling outfit that had Mittens winning the election by 5% is clearly in the tank for Obama.
Somehow I knew you'd focus on that instead of addressing my actual point.
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
Your point doesn't seem to have any facts backing it up, so why should I play that game? Sorry if that offends you, but this isn't talk radio....
Your point doesn't seem to have any facts backing it up, so why should I play that game? Sorry if that offends you, but this isn't talk radio....
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
Since when do I need facts to back up my opinion? This whole thread is a game, so now all of a sudden you don't want to play?
Since when do I need facts to back up my opinion? This whole thread is a game, so now all of a sudden you don't want to play?
duper
Well-known member
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
This is a hilarious exchange. I hope I'm not the only one entertained by it.
Of course...because a polling outfit that had Mittens winning the election by 5% is clearly in the tank for Obama.
Since when do I need facts to back up my opinion? This whole thread is a game, so now all of a sudden you don't want to play?
This is a hilarious exchange. I hope I'm not the only one entertained by it.
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
Mr Beck! I didn't know you were a college hockey fan?!?!?
Since when do I need facts to back up my opinion? This whole thread is a game, so now all of a sudden you don't want to play?
Mr Beck! I didn't know you were a college hockey fan?!?!?
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
Not likely. I'd say a small number of people actually read this thread. Wait, can I say that without citing some poll to back that up? Anyways, of those that read this thread, I'd say only about 15% are actually entertained. Oops, did it again. No website with numbers to point to, so I guess I shouldn't have posted anything.
Not likely. I'd say a small number of people actually read this thread. Wait, can I say that without citing some poll to back that up? Anyways, of those that read this thread, I'd say only about 15% are actually entertained. Oops, did it again. No website with numbers to point to, so I guess I shouldn't have posted anything.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Since when do I need facts to back up my opinion? This whole thread is a game, so now all of a sudden you don't want to play?
Just make them up like rover and priceless did in their post on the February drop in #s from January
Who cares if they were inaccurate
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
Right. The Head of the Current Administration was named Liar of the Year by a left-leaning organization no less, and yet they still cite whatever comes out as believable.
Just make them up like rover and priceless did in their post on the February drop in #s from January
Who cares if they were inaccurate
Right. The Head of the Current Administration was named Liar of the Year by a left-leaning organization no less, and yet they still cite whatever comes out as believable.
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
You do realize I'm going to keep torturing you guys as enrollment figures continue to spike. My advice is to get that Romney guy to "unskew" the figures for you.
But, look in the bright side. It'll prepare you for my rants when Hillary gets elected!
Just make them up like rover and priceless did in their post on the February drop in #s from January
Who cares if they were inaccurate
You do realize I'm going to keep torturing you guys as enrollment figures continue to spike. My advice is to get that Romney guy to "unskew" the figures for you.
But, look in the bright side. It'll prepare you for my rants when Hillary gets elected!
P
Priceless
Guest
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
I'm waiting for the numbers from Hamilton County.
I'm waiting for the numbers from Hamilton County.
Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
It would be interesting to see this logic played out to its natural conclusion--where human discourse consists of nothing but people repeating the following phrase at each other: "You previously said x, but x was not true, therefore your statement y is not true."
Right. The Head of the Current Administration was named Liar of the Year by a left-leaning organization no less, and yet they still cite whatever comes out as believable.
It would be interesting to see this logic played out to its natural conclusion--where human discourse consists of nothing but people repeating the following phrase at each other: "You previously said x, but x was not true, therefore your statement y is not true."
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Just admit you screwed up and typed incorrect data to make it look like you knew what y'all were talking about with yer glib responses
Think of this as an intervention
It's ok...
- Status