What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

Non-Conference scheduling is also a crap shoot. Agreements have to be drawn up years in advance. Nothing says that a big player team you create an agreement today with will be as strong as you want when you play them in a year or two. Obviously, winning helps your PWR whoever you are, but quality losses help too.

You don't think Wisconsin is a little p*ssed with how mediocre NMU is this season? Kinda like a few years back when Wisco beat us and dragged our PWR down with their mild season.

Wisconsin had it's own set of issues this year, the NMU losses are a symptom not the problem. Only scoring ~2 goals per game is the problem.

The advantage of conference games is that the "win" stays in the conference, when you lose a NC game, it drags down the RPI of everyone in your conference. More NC games are only good for a conference if they can be relatively sure of winning at least half the time.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

Wisconsin had it's own set of issues this year, the NMU losses are a symptom not the problem. Only scoring ~2 goals per game is the problem.

The advantage of conference games is that the "win" stays in the conference, when you lose a NC game, it drags down the RPI of everyone in your conference. More NC games are only good for a conference if they can be relatively sure of winning at least half the time.
The sad part with the new RPI calc putting less emphasis on Opp% and more on Opp Opp%, is that you are better off playing and beating the bottom teams in a good conference than playing the middle, upper end and risk losing.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

The advantage of conference games is that the "win" stays in the conference, when you lose a NC game, it drags down the RPI of everyone in your conference. More NC games are only good for a conference if they can be relatively sure of winning at least half the time.
You mean like when SCSU got swept by both UNH and NMU? ;)
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

The sad part with the new RPI calc putting less emphasis on Opp% and more on Opp Opp%, is that you are better off playing and beating the bottom teams in a good conference than playing the middle, upper end and risk losing.

Actually, the best option for the top teams are to play the teams that are near 0.500 in the strong(er) conference(s) and beat them. Paying the very bad teams, even from a strong conference, can still hurt your RPI since 21% is still Opp% if you win. The up side is that the near 0.500 teams will have a better chance of beating/tying on of the conferences top teams and thus improve your COp odds and may even sneak in as a TUC.

Of course, the irony is that if you lose you want it to be to a non-TUC from the conference with the fewest TUCs. While it will give you a hit in the RPI, it will not impact your COp or TUC records. Far better off to lose to a bottom end AH program than a middle of the road HE program.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

Early scheduling news:

I can't get my smart phone to copy the link from the NMU thread, but BGSU announced their WCHA schedule, and NMU has announced the fly to UAF, UAA, and UAH this upcoming year.

Sounds like there are scheduling quirks still.
 
Early scheduling news:

I can't get my smart phone to copy the link from the NMU thread, but BGSU announced their WCHA schedule, and NMU has announced the fly to UAF, UAA, and UAH this upcoming year.

Sounds like there are scheduling quirks still.
Teams will have to do the "triple" every year. There is really no way to avoid it and maintain a balanced schedule rotation which will even out over a four year period. It's really no different than someone playing at Bemidji, Mankato and Tech. And for a team like NMU, the flight to Huntsville, if they fly from Marquette is no longer a day than a bus ride to Bemidji. And if they fly from Green Bay, no worse than Bowling Green or Mankato.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

Early scheduling news:

I can't get my smart phone to copy the link from the NMU thread, but BGSU announced their WCHA schedule, and NMU has announced the fly to UAF, UAA, and UAH this upcoming year.

Sounds like there are scheduling quirks still.
By analyzing the BGSU schedule it appears that each team in a pair will play half of each pair twice and the other half of the pair either home or away.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

By analyzing the BGSU schedule it appears that each team in a pair will play half of each pair twice and the other half of the pair either home or away.
If that's the case for all, it would make a lot of sense. It would protect Huntsville and BG from having to go to Bemidji and Mankato in the same year as often, same for the 2 Alaska trips, or for Ferris and the Minnesotas.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

If that's the case for all, it would make a lot of sense. It would protect Huntsville and BG from having to go to Bemidji and Mankato in the same year as often, same for the 2 Alaska trips, or for Ferris and the Minnesotas.
It will guarantee that every team goes to at least 1 Alaska school every year, which I think would be good, because I'm sure no one wants to have a year where they don't go to Alaska, putting alot of stress on scheduling by making some years have 6 NC, others with 10. It really doesn't help much...you're looking at 2 of 4 years where you go to both teams in each pair. So in 4 years, NMU & MTU are going to play at both UAA and UAF twice.
 
Last edited:
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

It will guarantee that every team goes to at least 1 Alaska school every year, which I think would be good, because I'm sure no one wants to have a year where they don't go to Alaska, putting alot of stress on scheduling by making some years have 6 NC, others with 10. It really doesn't help much...you're looking at 2 of 4 years where you go to both teams in each pair. So in 4 years, NMU & MTU are going to play at both UAA and UAF.
They will both travel to both Alaskas this year, and NMU goes to Huntsville as well. I believe Tech will do it over a break period and go up and stay the week in between.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

They will both travel to both Alaskas this year, and NMU goes to Huntsville as well. I believe Tech will do it over a break period and go up and stay the week in between.
Sorry, that post you quoted was missing a word. In 4 years, NMU and MTU will play at both UAA and UAF twice, while going to either UAA or UAF in the other two seasons. It was reported that MTU will play at UAA/UAF the weekend before and after Thanksgiving and spend the week in Alaska.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

Sorry, that post you quoted was missing a word. In 4 years, NMU and MTU will play at both UAA and UAF twice, while going to either UAA or UAF in the other two seasons. It was reported that MTU will play at UAA/UAF the weekend before and after Thanksgiving and spend the week in Alaska.
That sucks. I wanted to do the week in Alaska, catching both series, but I'm sure not missing deer hunting for it.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

Sorry, that post you quoted was missing a word. In 4 years, NMU and MTU will play at both UAA and UAF twice, while going to either UAA or UAF in the other two seasons. It was reported that MTU will play at UAA/UAF the weekend before and after Thanksgiving and spend the week in Alaska.
In trying to figure out the schedule model, it appears that it will be that way for everyone. One Alaska trip every year and two in four years. Also will have to do the "triple" (the UA's...UAF, UAA, UAH) at least once in the four years.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

In trying to figure out the schedule model, it appears that it will be that way for everyone. One Alaska trip every year and two in four years. Also will have to do the "triple" (the UA's...UAF, UAA, UAH) at least once in the four years.
Why are you so hung up on this "triple?" Flying to UAH is probably going to better for most teams than driving to about half the rest of the lower 48 teams.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

Why are you so hung up on this "triple?" Flying to UAH is probably going to better for most teams than driving to about half the rest of the lower 48 teams.
Oh no doubt. In all actuality the two to Alaska is the same for every pair. Teams will make the trip to both Tech and Northern twice in four years and to at Tech one year and to Northern one year. Or Lake State and Ferris or Bemidji and Mankato.
 
Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)

Oh no doubt. In all actuality the two to Alaska is the same for every pair. Teams will make the trip to both Tech and Northern twice in four years and to at Tech one year and to Northern one year. Or Lake State and Ferris or Bemidji and Mankato.
And the only way to get to Mankato is by hot air balloon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top