D
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Guest
I'm sure they'll try to do this but realistically I doubt it has a chance of succeeding.
While making it more difficult to get birth control no doubt
I'm sure they'll try to do this but realistically I doubt it has a chance of succeeding.
I'm sure they'll try to do this but realistically I doubt it has a chance of succeeding.
A couple might try, but those laws will be struck down as unconstitutional faster than Flaggy can post a link to Alex Jones. Once you enter a state, and execute an act in that state - commerce, camping, hunting, B&D, or even abortion, you're engaging in an act that involves two intrastate parties. I cannot be punished by MN for an act I commit while standing in any other state.Plus, you know the Republicans will pass numerous laws against being able to travel across state lines for an abortion.
Not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about enforcement at the federal level. MN might not be able to punish you but the FBI and the DOJ can, and under Republican control would. It’s like with marijuana, it’s legal in both Washington and Oregon but a farmer in Oregon can’t sell in Washington because the Fed says so.A couple might try, but those laws will be struck down as unconstitutional faster than Flaggy can post a link to Alex Jones. Once you enter a state, and execute an act in that state - commerce, camping, hunting, B&D, or even abortion, you're engaging in an act that involves two intrastate parties. I cannot be punished by MN for an act I commit while standing in any other state.
Yeah, I don't really see how they can change the commerce clause enough for that to work and they can't just ban people from leaving the state.Wanna bet?
Not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about enforcement at the federal level. MN might not be able to punish you but the FBI and the DOJ can, and under Republican control would. It’s like with marijuana, it’s legal in both Washington and Oregon but a farmer in Oregon can’t sell in Washington because the Fed says so.
Logically you are correct, but you don’t think, and this is my argument, a Republican held Supreme Court would twist the interpretation enough to allow such a law to stand?Your marijuana example is interstate commerce, and the law states that interstate commerce is within the federal government's jurisdiction. Once a person physically enters another state and then proceeds to conduct commerce - even in regards to healthcare - it is now intrastate commerce.
Logically you are correct, but you don’t think, and this is my argument, a Republican held Supreme Court would twist the interpretation enough to allow such a law to stand?
Do you really believe that? We have a clear case of a party colluding with a foreign power to influence an election and they not only didn’t face backlash they’ve been rewarded, abortion wouldn’t even get people to blink.No, I don't. And I think the politicians who installed those justices would face a backlash from the electorate if we were to ever start down that path.
Do you really believe that? We have a clear case of a party colluding with a foreign power to influence an election and they not only didn’t face backlash they’ve been rewarded, abortion wouldn’t even get people to blink.
You severely underestimate the impact abortion has in warping people’s voting habits, joe is a prime example.Yes, I do believe that. There is a point of critical mass, of stepping too far over the line, that will awaken the American public to actually start voting again. Once that happens, and the threat is relieved, they'll go back to docile complacency, but their message will still have been served. Those politicians will lose their reelection campaigns, and the GOP its majorities.
You severely underestimate the impact abortion has in warping people’s voting habits, joe is a prime example.
No, I see it firsthand. My MIL has stated that she would be a Democrat if not for the party's stance on abortion. She's a Catholic first and foremost when it comes to politics.
You severely underestimate the impact abortion has in warping people’s voting habits, joe is a prime example.
"...I die the king's faithful servant, but God's first."
Yes, I do believe that. There is a point of critical mass, of stepping too far over the line, that will awaken the American public to actually start voting again. Once that happens, and the threat is relieved, they'll go back to docile complacency, but their message will still have been served. Those politicians will lose their reelection campaigns, and the GOP its majorities.
I think there’s truth to that, but as we get true ideologues and fewer politicians in office, that changes.
Say the Supreme overturn Roe. (Of course to do so would mean a case gets to their bench that could impact Roe, but such details and trivialities ... )
It reverts back to "the several States", no?
What would be wrong with that?
What would be wrong with just leaving it alone?