What do you care? You're not a woman, so you'll never have to make that decision.
You're avoiding the question.
What do you care? You're not a woman, so you'll never have to make that decision.
You're avoiding the question.
No, that's the answer. If you don't want a pregnancy terminated and you're a man there's a real simple solution to that problem. Real simple.
Are you implying that you can spread pollen without worrying about the consequences? "Not my problem!" is not a defense - it's a cop out.
Are you implying that you can spread pollen without worrying about the consequences? "Not my problem!" is not a defense - it's a cop out.
You're avoiding the question.
Tell me, when you crack open an egg for breakfast and see it had gotten fertilized, do you start calling it a chicken?
Are you implying that you can spread pollen without worrying about the consequences? "Not my problem!" is not a defense - it's a cop out.
Why We Are Leaving the G.O.P.
By Susan Bevan and Susan Cullman
As Republicans, we spent four decades working inside the party to produce effective policies helping women and families. Despite growing malice from an anti-choice faction, we kept our disagreements within the family. We redoubled our efforts to find common ground, rather than simply walk away.
Our argument was simple: True fiscal conservatives should embrace family planning because it reduces poverty, increases educational attainment and work force competitiveness, improves health and provides people the opportunity to make educated moral choices. We incorrectly assumed that our fellow fiscal conservatives would join us in applauding the reduction in the number of unintended pregnancies, which saved taxpayers billions of dollars spent on the welfare state.
Instead, the policies and programs that led to these outcomes came under constant fire. The far right was more interested in conflating abortion and birth control for political purposes. It is fiscally disingenuous to deny birth control coverage and then bemoan unintended pregnancies and abortion.
How about original intent?
Since the majority of this Board is now in hysterics over the repeal of Roe v Wade now that Kennedy will retire, I will state the following:
As abhorrent as it is, legal abortion will not go away. Restrictions, but not prohibition, will be permitted. Just like a lot of things, the restrictions may be looser in the NE and West Coast, and tighter in the Bible Belt. But if a woman wants to terminate her pregnancy, she can.
Where legislation is on the books, that stays. If abortion was imposed via judicial fiat, then the legislature should step up and state what the people's wishes are.
Since the majority of this Board is now in hysterics over the repeal of Roe v Wade now that Kennedy will retire, I will state the following:
As abhorrent as it is, legal abortion will not go away. Restrictions, but not prohibition, will be permitted. Just like a lot of things, the restrictions may be looser in the NE and West Coast, and tighter in the Bible Belt. But if a woman wants to terminate her pregnancy, she can.
Where legislation is on the books, that stays. If abortion was imposed via judicial fiat, then the legislature should step up and state what the people's wishes are.
But if a woman wants to terminate her pregnancy, she can.
yeah, a poor teen from the Bible Belt can travel hundreds or thousands of miles to the closest clinic no problem
yeah, a poor teen from the Bible Belt can travel hundreds or thousands (once the bible belt bans it) of miles to the closest clinic no problem
clueless as ever, but I'm sure you've got a raging hard-on over the thought of abortion getting a hell of a lot harder for women (and for many downright impossible)
I said restricted (as in time and whatever else the legislature thinks), not banned.
It's restricted now genius. Read a newspaper and see what those restrictions do to people who have no power, and no wealth.