Re: The end of leagues as we know?
I DONT BLAME UNO, UMD, or CC. As I've said before, they really didn't have a choice, say yes or be left behind. DU wanted this, UND helped push it along. The blame for everything that is unfolding lays at the feet of Terry Pegula and the University of North Dakota.
That is a really naive view. DU and UND can't form a new conference all by themselves. They can't announce to UNO, UMD, and CC that they are leaving, and hockey is over for those schools if they don't follow. DU and UND may have pushed this new conference. But without willing followers, it doesn't go anywhere. If the other schools were truly devoted to the greater good of college hockey, they could have said no and this new conference never forms. But UNO, UMD, CC, and Miami saw what they believe to be a chance to look out for their own interests, and they took it. If there is any blame in this, it is shared by all six.
For the record and although I'm a DU fan doesn't mean that I'm a fan of all that what has transpired in the last week. However, I have not seen anything that supports many peeps accusations that DU lead this effort. Whether the admin at DU did or not, I'm saddened by result. I assign blame to the creation of the Big 10 hockey conference creation. Alvarez is the a-hole I direct my venom toward. But, I do support my school's reaction to it as it was in the best interest of the program I support. That said, I am not em sad about this whole thing. It sucks balls.
I agree with you in that I am saddened by recent events. I had hoped that the "big" schools remaining in the WCHA and CCHA would remain behind and form the pillars of their newly rearranged conferences. I think that would have been the best move for college hockey as a whole, certainly over the next few years.
I disagree that this new conference is in the best interests of the schools who are forming it. The five schools coming out of the WCHA would have been favored to be the WCHA's top 5 in many seasons post 2013. UND and DU would have been favored as the new WCHA's major powers. Assuming that Notre Dame goes to either the new conference or HE, the removal of Miami and Notre Dame from the CCHA removes the two programs that would have been favored as the CCHA's new major powers. UND, DU, Miami, and Notre Dame would have been expected to make most NCAA tourneys in the coming years. The wins these programs would have likely racked up would have kept fans in he stands and money flowing through the gates.
These teams have traded in their front-runner status for a major gamble. They have put at least six of the current power programs in college hockey into a single conference. That number may become as high as eight. For all eight of those programs, the road to the NCAA tournament just got much harder. If any of these programs should slip in this new power conference, and become the new doormat instead of one of the new WCHA/CCHA powers, the seats in the arenas may not host as many fans. Maybe other revenues will make up for that, maybe not. But this new conference is a major gamble for every program that moves into it.
This move is sort of like taking SEC football, dumping the bottom half, and replacing that bottom half with a couple of power teams from the Big 12 as a response to competetion from the Big 10 and Pac 10 (or whatever the numbers are these days
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba9a2/ba9a21a68dec62fad51a2b2ae35f280c4387bf57" alt="Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
). They may all be great programs today, but someone HAS to lose and finish last. Its the nature of sports.