I'm not so sure you should believe those newsletters you still get from Liberty U, Bob. Nice to see you so enamored with China like a typical conservative. I wonder if these gazillion Christians you've apparently found over there manage to avoid the brutal one child policy of that country you so admire.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
- Status
I'm not so sure you should believe those newsletters you still get from Liberty U, Bob. Nice to see you so enamored with China like a typical conservative. I wonder if these gazillion Christians you've apparently found over there manage to avoid the brutal one child policy of that country you so admire.
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
You really got mixed up on policy positions here, even by your standards. Try again.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
War is imminent if Romney's elected. You can take that to the bank.
War is imminent if Romney's elected. You can take that to the bank.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
Replaced it with a "forward" poster on the wall of the consulate in Benghazi.
Replaced it with a "forward" poster on the wall of the consulate in Benghazi.
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
BTW, want to ski in VA in the summer? Go to Lynchburg.
I get the newsletters from Liberty U, not Bob. Please keep us straight.
BTW, want to ski in VA in the summer? Go to Lynchburg.
Or perhaps the bin laden post mortem photos?
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
No question about it, killing one guy definitely is a foreign policy. And the modest way His Carterness has been end zone dancing ever since is a real inspiration.
"General Motors is alive and Osama Bin Laden is dead, and so is Ambassador Stevens and three other guys." Will that fit on a bumper sticker?
How much of a Middle East "expert" does it take to question the "spontaneity" of multiple "demonstrations" in different countries, all on the anniversary of 9/11? His Grovelingtoislamistsness is walking back the insulting lies he and his administration told about those murders in Benghazi.
No question about it, killing one guy definitely is a foreign policy. And the modest way His Carterness has been end zone dancing ever since is a real inspiration.
"General Motors is alive and Osama Bin Laden is dead, and so is Ambassador Stevens and three other guys." Will that fit on a bumper sticker?
How much of a Middle East "expert" does it take to question the "spontaneity" of multiple "demonstrations" in different countries, all on the anniversary of 9/11? His Grovelingtoislamistsness is walking back the insulting lies he and his administration told about those murders in Benghazi.
Last edited:
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
Seems like there's a few of 'em left. Sadly.
The overwhelming majority of conservatives, IMO, support any POTUS killing any enemy of the United States overseas at any time. And that includes His Carterness. The problem for libstains in reveling in the killing of Al Awlaki and his ugly kid, for instance, is that everyone understands they're being dishonest. They support His Failedness selecting and approving targets for assassination. But they would have opposed it with every fiber of their being if Bush had ordered it. Mr. "I was for the war before I was against it" would be apoplectic. And the usual MSM would be out there whining about "killing an American without due process."
Al Awlaki was as responsible for those deaths at Fort Hood as "Dr." Hasan. And he was holed up in a country which would not extradict him back here even as he continued his efforts to awaken jihadist enthusiasms among other Americans. What to do? Kill him, of course. We did. And it was the right thing to do, no matter who pulled the trigger.
It is the duty of POTUS to protect us from foreign enemies, he is at the top of a world wide chain of command, and our current president did. And I support him for that. Libstains have to argue they support Obama here and try to assert credibly they would have supported Bush under identical circumstances. Nah, they can't do it.
Seems like there's a few of 'em left. Sadly.
The overwhelming majority of conservatives, IMO, support any POTUS killing any enemy of the United States overseas at any time. And that includes His Carterness. The problem for libstains in reveling in the killing of Al Awlaki and his ugly kid, for instance, is that everyone understands they're being dishonest. They support His Failedness selecting and approving targets for assassination. But they would have opposed it with every fiber of their being if Bush had ordered it. Mr. "I was for the war before I was against it" would be apoplectic. And the usual MSM would be out there whining about "killing an American without due process."
Al Awlaki was as responsible for those deaths at Fort Hood as "Dr." Hasan. And he was holed up in a country which would not extradict him back here even as he continued his efforts to awaken jihadist enthusiasms among other Americans. What to do? Kill him, of course. We did. And it was the right thing to do, no matter who pulled the trigger.
It is the duty of POTUS to protect us from foreign enemies, he is at the top of a world wide chain of command, and our current president did. And I support him for that. Libstains have to argue they support Obama here and try to assert credibly they would have supported Bush under identical circumstances. Nah, they can't do it.
Last edited:
There's no crying in politics Opie, so cut it out. Nobody was on Bush's case for taking out AQ operatives. The problem was torture (which even old geezer McCain was against as well as Ashcroft) and a foolhardy war launched on false premises.
BTW, you're probably used to doing this, but you knucks' really show your age by blathering Carter Carter Carter every 5 seconds. You do realize half the electorate has no idea what you're talking about as to remember Carter's Presidency in any detail you'd be approaching 50 by now. But, if you want to live in the past, as in over three decades ago, be my guest. I'm guessing you still crank up Barry Manilow music and watch old I Love Lucy reruns too.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
The thing that is truly hair-raising for the Hagiographic Right is that half the electorate has absolutely no memory of or interest in Ronny Raygun Jesus -- to them, the Gipper might as well be Fatty Arbuckle. In the late 60's Dem politicos were still taking the FDR coalition for granted, while the country had left them behind as a desiccated anachronism. That is where the right is today -- still full of bluster and BS on the outside, but rotten and hollow.
The Next Right is already out there and none of us know about it. It won't look anything like today's right. It will do to the Dems what Obama is doing to the Republicans -- not saw them down but kick through an old, dead stump.
The thing that is truly hair-raising for the Hagiographic Right is that half the electorate has absolutely no memory of or interest in Ronny Raygun Jesus -- to them, the Gipper might as well be Fatty Arbuckle. In the late 60's Dem politicos were still taking the FDR coalition for granted, while the country had left them behind as a desiccated anachronism. That is where the right is today -- still full of bluster and BS on the outside, but rotten and hollow.
The Next Right is already out there and none of us know about it. It won't look anything like today's right. It will do to the Dems what Obama is doing to the Republicans -- not saw them down but kick through an old, dead stump.
Last edited:
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
You really think Achmadinnerjacket cares who is US president?
No matter how much we may not "want" war, do you really think that we can unilaterally get people who hate us to stop trying to kill us merely by refusing to fight them???
You really think Achmadinnerjacket cares who is US president?
No matter how much we may not "want" war, do you really think that we can unilaterally get people who hate us to stop trying to kill us merely by refusing to fight them???
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
Did Vietnam or Iraq attack the US? Typical conservative. You never learn from history.
You really think Achmadinnerjacket cares who is US president?
No matter how much we may not "want" war, do you really think that we can unilaterally get people who hate us to stop trying to kill us merely by refusing to fight them???
Did Vietnam or Iraq attack the US? Typical conservative. You never learn from history.
Last Dem President people think of: Clinton
Last GOP President people think of: Bush II
End. Of. Story.
While these things go in cycles, what has to be disturbing for the GOP is that the good strategists are all gone. Atwater is dead, Ed Rollins is an old man and Rove would rather play with his SuperPAC. I brought up an example a while back about Elizabeth Warren. As the only, and I mean only, Dem in Mass who realistically could defeat Brown, all the GOP had to do was allow her recess appointment to the Consumer Bureau and they would have guaranteed Brown's re-election. If Rove was still running things, they'd never had made such a fundamentally stupid mistake.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
They were desperate to neuter the Consumer Bureau. Desperate.
They were desperate to neuter the Consumer Bureau. Desperate.
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
This was on all the major news sites across the board:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/iran_test_fires_missiles_designed_jXNVDDiomq5ceqOCVTtDlL
This was on all the major news sites across the board:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/iran_test_fires_missiles_designed_jXNVDDiomq5ceqOCVTtDlL
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
Clear indication that the sanctions are working.
Clear indication that the sanctions are working.
Re: The 4th Global War on Terror - Deja vu all over again!
Um, Iraq did invade Kuwait in 1991, no? or was that omitted from your history book? if an ally is attacked and calls upon us for help, are you saying we turn our backs on them?
and Japan did bomb Pearl Harbor in 1940, no? or does your history book not go back that far?
Oh, and does your history book tell you that it was two Democrat Presidents who involved us in Vietnam? or was that part rewritten since I was in school?
I'm not defending wars that we initiate. How do you suggest we respond when someone attacks us, unprovoked?
or do you believe that our existence is enough by itself to provoke people?
or is being logically consistent just too much effort and bother for you even to engage in?
Um, Iraq did invade Kuwait in 1991, no? or was that omitted from your history book? if an ally is attacked and calls upon us for help, are you saying we turn our backs on them?
and Japan did bomb Pearl Harbor in 1940, no? or does your history book not go back that far?
Oh, and does your history book tell you that it was two Democrat Presidents who involved us in Vietnam? or was that part rewritten since I was in school?
I'm not defending wars that we initiate. How do you suggest we respond when someone attacks us, unprovoked?
or do you believe that our existence is enough by itself to provoke people?
or is being logically consistent just too much effort and bother for you even to engage in?
- Status