Re: The 2010 Winter Olympics Women's Ice Hockey Tournament
I agree that NCAA programs should contribute to the advancement of European hockey. But simply recruiting European players is not enough. Rules be d**ned...rules are just the tools of the powerful to keep out the weak. After all, the big Wall Street banks support increased regulation not out of some social consciousness, but because they hope the costs of compliance will drive their smaller competitors out of business.
So what else should the NCAA do?
First of all, European players should be exempt from committing penalties. This will serve to increase their ice time, and result in more scoring opportunities. It would also look good from the perspective of Patty Kaz selections.
Further, all posts and crossbars hit by european players should count as goals. After all, the imperial system is discriminatory to players who grew up with the metric system. They might confuse the 6' width of the goal for 2 meters, and think they have more space to shoot at than they do. Canadians, however, are too good already to deserve such consideration. This will result in more scoring from European players, which will play favorably back home with young girls, encouraging more to join the sport.
Lastly, European players should receive an assist on all goals which they did not score themselves, even if they are on the bench. After all, if they weren't on the bench, they would be on the ice. And that could possibly have prevented the other player from scoring. Therefore, the simple fact that they were on the bench contributed directly to other player's goal. Again, this would increase scoring from European players, which would improve visibility and popularity of the sport back home.
Thoughts?
I agree that NCAA programs should contribute to the advancement of European hockey. But simply recruiting European players is not enough. Rules be d**ned...rules are just the tools of the powerful to keep out the weak. After all, the big Wall Street banks support increased regulation not out of some social consciousness, but because they hope the costs of compliance will drive their smaller competitors out of business.
So what else should the NCAA do?
First of all, European players should be exempt from committing penalties. This will serve to increase their ice time, and result in more scoring opportunities. It would also look good from the perspective of Patty Kaz selections.
Further, all posts and crossbars hit by european players should count as goals. After all, the imperial system is discriminatory to players who grew up with the metric system. They might confuse the 6' width of the goal for 2 meters, and think they have more space to shoot at than they do. Canadians, however, are too good already to deserve such consideration. This will result in more scoring from European players, which will play favorably back home with young girls, encouraging more to join the sport.
Lastly, European players should receive an assist on all goals which they did not score themselves, even if they are on the bench. After all, if they weren't on the bench, they would be on the ice. And that could possibly have prevented the other player from scoring. Therefore, the simple fact that they were on the bench contributed directly to other player's goal. Again, this would increase scoring from European players, which would improve visibility and popularity of the sport back home.
Thoughts?