What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Honestly, I think we've spent enough time on this kid. Move on.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Nick Papagiorgio said:
Hockey East itinerary

February 5-9 Schedule of events

2/5 - UML beats BU. Uh oh for BC. Meanwhile BC beats UMass. Stupid BC fans declare that BC "will kill" BU in the Beanpot, "this year is different", "we're the better team and we're going to win."

2/6-2/7 - BU is angry. So is Jack. Fanboys that write for student newspapers will attend practices and interview players about the Beanpot game vs. BC. Practices will be intense as BU players are focused and look to save their season once again. Fights may even erupt during practice. Players indicate to fanboy reporters that they have been having special player-only meetings and other special meetings Saturday and Sunday to refocus their thoughts.

2/8 - BC bends over for BU again sans astroglide. Ouchie Eagles. There will be some contraversy as BU will benefit from some sort of video review (have never seen this before!). BU national champs!

2/9 - Grounddog day. Rhett sees his shadow, it's going to be an early spring for the Terriers.
Click to expand...
:D
Well done.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Brian Gentry said:
Aside from the grade school humor, this sign may have made sense unless there was the fact that BU's power play is #10 and NU's is #40. The first goal last night was a power play goal! FAIL! :cool:
Click to expand...
That sign is most definitely a WIN! :p
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

BUT09 said:
That's okay, because we have freshmen who will entertain themselves by chanting obscenities until shushed by those around them.
Click to expand...
Yeah, we tried to drown out the "Sucks to BU" while we were playing Harvard with a "Let's Go Eagles."
Terrier520 said:
This is an honest question.
Click to expand...
Serious question here... when you search for living accommodations, is proximity to a nearby building a major factor?
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

candycanes99 said:
Word on the street is that eageefat got hungry.

bc_jester.jpg
Click to expand...


Is this guy related to Yankeefat? I see a family resemblence here.

:p
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Brian Gentry said:
Aside from the grade school humor, this sign may have made sense unless there was the fact that BU's power play is #10 and NU's is #40. The first goal last night was a power play goal! FAIL! :cool:
Click to expand...

you have obviously missed the point. the reference to hockey was just to avoid having the sign stolen by the authorities.

the true meaning was to point out that the typical fanboy is a pickle puffer.. i mean have you seen this quiddlet guy? also, the fanboys apparently think NU guys have problems with erectile dysfunction. how else would they know that? read between the lines, dude.

13renclan said:
It's not as clear as BU=right/BC=wrong, BC just happens to have a few of the biggest d-bag posters in you, Nick, and Carmine along with some guest appearances who seem to make it their top priority to annoy other fans with humor that only you're laughing at.
Click to expand...


i dont find your humor funny, crybaby. i guess that makes you a d-bag.
 
Last edited:
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

defkit said:
he did a nice sell job on the fall. While he is only a sophomore, I expect David to be able to anticipate these things and react more appropriately.
Click to expand...

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-BTO_N-Uhww&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-BTO_N-Uhww&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

not that you ever had any credibility. but, yeah, what a diver
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

SteveF said:
not that you ever had any credibility. but, yeah, what a diver
Click to expand...

It is possible to sell a hit to make it look worse than it really is. I'm on the fence on how bad the hit was. Either way, it was a hit Warso should not have taken and he deserved the penalty if not a double minor for it.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

ActionJoe said:
It is possible to sell a hit to make it look worse than it really is. I'm on the fence on how bad the hit was. Either way, it was a hit Warso should not have taken and he deserved the penalty if not a double minor for it.
Click to expand...

We've all seen similar shoves after the whistle were guys shove back and don't crash down to the ice. However, given that Warsofsky's height he really had to jab upwards to catch him in the chin there, and I do think he caught the guy by surprise. Not sure there was much selling.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

candycanes99 said:
We've all seen similar shoves after the whistle were guys shove back and don't crash down to the ice. However, given that Warsofsky's height he really had to jab upwards to catch him in the chin there, and I do think he caught the guy by surprise. Not sure there was much selling.
Click to expand...

I've experienced a stick to the jaw/windpipe area in the case of an ACCIDENTAL high stick, and it hurts like hell. With Warsofsky swinging it like he was, I don't think he was selling the hit at all.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

SteveF said:
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-BTO_N-Uhww&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-BTO_N-Uhww&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

not that you ever had any credibility. but, yeah, what a diver
Click to expand...

Wait, you actually don't see that at 35 seconds? That was a Vinny Saponari-worthy dive, on an obvious, stupid penalty by Warsofsky.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

SteveF said:
i dont find your humor funny, crybaby. i guess that makes you a d-bag.
Click to expand...

Logic doesn't apply to reach that conclusion. I said you were a d-bag who aims to **** people off with your nonsense, not one because you do it.

Because I think your constant BS has gotten old, I must be a crybaby. Logically. But yes, I'm a d-bag.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

SteveF said:
not that you ever had any credibility. but, yeah, what a diver
Click to expand...

Steve - you can't really watch that and think that the Husky didn't help the call can you? I'm not saying Warsofsky didn't deserve a penalty, I'm saying the NU guy did a nice sell job. He embellished big time.

Oh and another thing - can it be contact to the head high sticking if your stick doesn't actually make contact with the head? Just curious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top