Jon
Say, this is nice.
Re: The 2009-10 NHL regular season thread: Slightly less meaningless hockey
This is the most troubling part of your post.
Let's face it: this is hockey. If the Bruins could somehow figure out how to play stingy defense in the playoffs and get their goaltender hot, they can win a cup, regardless of how crappy the scoring is. This isn't like basketball where you need an all star in 3 positions or baseball where you need power pitching and hitting or even football where you need a great defense and an above average QB (well, maybe just Trent Dilfer). Jacobs and company suck at what they do, but the team can still win.
While I tend to like Jon's posting,
This is the most troubling part of your post.
Let's face it: this is hockey. If the Bruins could somehow figure out how to play stingy defense in the playoffs and get their goaltender hot, they can win a cup, regardless of how crappy the scoring is. This isn't like basketball where you need an all star in 3 positions or baseball where you need power pitching and hitting or even football where you need a great defense and an above average QB (well, maybe just Trent Dilfer). Jacobs and company suck at what they do, but the team can still win.