I don't often say this but Joy Ann Reid is right...they made the President the King and the Court his "Hand" ala Game of Thrones.
Shhh you sound hysterical.
**** him, telling us were hysterical for thinking the court could strip rights and here he is explaining how it’s not a big deal.
president- immunity to do what he wants
gov agencies- no authority
He had every right to take those documents, Presidential Records Act says he could. And since that is part of his official duties, he can't be prosecuted.Like I said...he's going to push and push and see what SCOTUS will side with him on. And I wouldn't trust those six judges any further than I could throw them...
He had every right to take those documents, Presidential Records Act says he could. And since that is part of his official duties, he can't be prosecuted.
And the Supremes will say, hell yeah!!!
Well Republican presidents have that immunity I doubt a Democrat will...
So which of the justices is a Lannister who is ****ing their own sibling?
In 2016, Hillary Clinton gave a speech in Wisconsin about the importance of the Supreme Court. She warned that 2016 was "make or break" for the court—and the country. National media—focused on her emails and Trump's antics—barely covered the speech.
Donald Trump’s former Sec. Def. Mark Esper: “[Trump] was suggesting that...we should bring in the troops and shoot the protesters.”
Q: “The commander-in-chief was suggesting that the U.S. military shoot protesters?”
Esper: “Yes, in the streets of our nation’s capital.”
That is why I said Joe should means test it right now Make sure to do it and describe it using the very words the Justices used so when they don't give him Immunity even Stevie Wonder will be able to see why...
(and hey Trump will be dead!)
Donald Trump’s former Sec. Def. Mark Esper: “[Trump] was suggesting that...we should bring in the troops and shoot the protesters.”
Q: “The commander-in-chief was suggesting that the U.S. military shoot protesters?”
Esper: “Yes, in the streets of our nation’s capital.”
Official duty, Commander in Chief, so all good. Those damn BLM cucks should have known better.
How many times was Hillary right?
Hovey - what if he actually followed through with this now...?
The question I have for all the MAGAs defending this decision is this: What were all the instances in the past of POTUS being handcuffed to act on behalf of the American public for fear of prosecution that is now solved?
Never mind this was never brought to SCOTUS because of that, it was brought only for the personal gain of a POTUS facing prosecution outside the bounds of running the country. I just cannot fathom how the **** SCOTUS has gone this far.
Now is it official duty to take classified documents with you to read on the ****ter on your way out the door?
what is official and was is not?
Then you prosecute him for it DUH! Oh wait...
And the answer to your question is...never. No President has ever felt handcuffed. Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus during the Civil War, Truman nuked two cities in Japan, Kennedy was doing all sorts of shady crap in Cuba, Johnson lied about almost everything in the Vietnam War and had the FBI spy on people all over the country including people in his own party and MLK, Nixon committed all sorts of crimes, Reagan lied to the American people on live TV/Iran Contra, Dubya launched a war that killed a million Iraqis...need I continue?
Justice Roberts pretending that Presidents need to be immune because we need "decisive actions" is one of the biggest pieces of crap in a decision since Plessy v. Ferguson. The fact that it is almost lifted from Project 2025 tells you all you need to know. That Hovey pretends it is legitimate means he either has no idea what he is talking about or he is a sheep. His stupid "would you want a President arrested in Texas for the border" canard tells me he has no idea how the country works, how the criminal justice system (used to) work or the State and Federal System works. Reading that was pathetic and sad...
His conviction in New York will be overturned. He walks. I thought at least the conviction would stand, but legitimate trials by juries mean nothing when it comes to the Republicans Orange God.
How is falsifying your personal business' financial records an official act of the office of the President?
Maybe we should ask Hovey?