Re: RPI Off-Season Thread 2012: An Off-Season to Be Optimistic
It was great seeing a ECAC team in Tampa, im hoping we dont have to wait another 9 years to get a team back to the Frozen Four but unfortunately, I have a feeling the next drought might be longer.
Also, not that it really matters anymore but this article about some of the pros and cons of adding UConn to Hockey East was posted on NEHJ website yesterday and mentions RPI a couple times.
http://hockeyjournal.com/news/colle...t_Journal-_Adding_UConn_has_its_pros_and_cons
Kinda get the impression that Hockey East was never really interested in RPI this time around. I wonder which athletic directors Bertagna is talking about? BC is the first one that comes to mind.
It was great seeing a ECAC team in Tampa, im hoping we dont have to wait another 9 years to get a team back to the Frozen Four but unfortunately, I have a feeling the next drought might be longer.

Also, not that it really matters anymore but this article about some of the pros and cons of adding UConn to Hockey East was posted on NEHJ website yesterday and mentions RPI a couple times.
http://hockeyjournal.com/news/colle...t_Journal-_Adding_UConn_has_its_pros_and_cons
On the flip side, there are reasons UConn is attractive – particularly compared to some of the other schools that have been batted around as possible 12th members, such as RPI and Quinnipiac. The Huskies’ women’s program is a part of the league already, and the alignment would certainly be attractive to both the league and program. UConn is also a Division I school across the board, which commissioner Joe Bertagna alluded to being a desired quality when he spoke with the Hockey Journal back in October about Notre Dame’s addition.
“There probably are within the league some athletic directors who don’t feel philosophically that a small Division III school should be competing in Division I,” Bertagna said. “That’s kind of the way the NCAA has gone in the last 20 years.”
Kinda get the impression that Hockey East was never really interested in RPI this time around. I wonder which athletic directors Bertagna is talking about? BC is the first one that comes to mind.