Re: RPI 2010 Off-Season III -- How we learned to stop worrying and love the Class of '14
Re: RPI 2010 Off-Season III -- How we learned to stop worrying and love the Class of '14
And more injuries, and less shorthanded goals. Plus, forget about seeing Chase and JD'A on the PK just terrorizing the opponent's entry strategy. There's no way that Appert would chance either of them being on the ice for 2 (or 5) straight minutes.
There are two causes for this: 1) An inept powerplay (see: RPI circa 07-09) that wouldn't score anyways; 2) An excellent PK team that just stifles you and doesn't allow you to break into the zone cleanly. Either way, you're not going to see a whole lot of scoring increase from this rule change. What will change is that skaters who have been on for 40-50 seconds (because the PP team is adequate but not tremendous) and are too gassed to do anything but ice the puck are going to ice it anyways. Repeat until PP team eventually scores. Is that goal really earned, or is it just the result of a rule change that severely handicaps the defensive team?
On the "Rule Changes" thread, someone pointed out that the Delay of Game rule that exists in the NHL is slightly modified for college. In college, the ref has to declare that there was intent by the defensive player to put the puck over the boards. So, expect a lot of pucks to "accidentally" get put over the boards to avoid icing the puck.
Re: RPI 2010 Off-Season III -- How we learned to stop worrying and love the Class of '14
Obviously we'll have to see how it plays out but I think an immediate draw back in the other end is just as interesting as watching a defenseman skate up to the blue line (or even red) and dump it in. The longer the PKers are kept on the ice the bigger the advantage for the team with the PP. The net result in the long run is more scoring - period.
And more injuries, and less shorthanded goals. Plus, forget about seeing Chase and JD'A on the PK just terrorizing the opponent's entry strategy. There's no way that Appert would chance either of them being on the ice for 2 (or 5) straight minutes.
I don't know about you but nothing to me is more boring than a PP where the defense ices is 4 or 5 times and nothing happens in between. Now a clear out of the zone will require some skill - not just winding up and slapping the puck. I like that idea.
There are two causes for this: 1) An inept powerplay (see: RPI circa 07-09) that wouldn't score anyways; 2) An excellent PK team that just stifles you and doesn't allow you to break into the zone cleanly. Either way, you're not going to see a whole lot of scoring increase from this rule change. What will change is that skaters who have been on for 40-50 seconds (because the PP team is adequate but not tremendous) and are too gassed to do anything but ice the puck are going to ice it anyways. Repeat until PP team eventually scores. Is that goal really earned, or is it just the result of a rule change that severely handicaps the defensive team?
On the "Rule Changes" thread, someone pointed out that the Delay of Game rule that exists in the NHL is slightly modified for college. In college, the ref has to declare that there was intent by the defensive player to put the puck over the boards. So, expect a lot of pucks to "accidentally" get put over the boards to avoid icing the puck.