You are absolutely correct. Atlantic Hockey is certainly a bad conference.
You seem to know so much, which team do you play for?
You are absolutely correct. Atlantic Hockey is certainly a bad conference.
Um... no. Are you really saying that your Atlantic Hockey brethren help RIT's PWR? While it's true that the OoC games against top ranked opponents make a huge difference, you play more games in conference and they matter just as much if not more.Conversely, teams like QU who have a relatively easier schedule can slide right into the top spot.
More Qualified teams like say Denver, UNH, and Minnesota State? Oh wait your talking about teams that didn't make the tournament those teams did make the Tourament and lost to RIT![]()
Um... no. Are you really saying that your Atlantic Hockey brethren help RIT's PWR? While it's true that the OoC games against top ranked opponents make a huge difference, you play more games in conference and they matter just as much if not more.
As for QU and the PWR, we finished overall #1 because we swept St. Cloud back in November. Without that the Huskies would have likely claimed the top spot over us.
I don't believe SLU lost to RIT.
Not quite sure re "your" point but some might argue that Dartmouth,CCT, Cornell, Minnesota even RPI are more deserving but don't have the luxury of competing for an auto bid in what is acknowledged to be the weakest conference
Hopefully to be rendered moot by RIT "moving on up" to the ECAC w/ other Liberty brethren
I don't believe SLU lost to RIT.
Not quite sure re "your" point but some might argue that Dartmouth,CCT, Cornell, Minnesota even RPI are more deserving but don't have the luxury of competing for an auto bid in what is acknowledged to be the weakest conference
Hopefully to be rendered moot by RIT "moving on up" to the ECAC w/ other Liberty brethren
You were comparing RIT to QU weren't you?I'm saying when you're winning a moderate SOS in a league like the ECAC, you're team is going to get ranked over a team from the NCHC because their schedules are all moderate to hard.
We finished with a SOS of 17 while RIT was 59. The ECAC had 8 teams in the top 25 PWR; AH had 1.Considering PWR only reflects your performance to your schedule, it harshly penalizes schools with limited OOC game that do not get the opportunity to play a hard schedule. Conversely, teams like QU who have a relatively easier schedule can slide right into the top spot.
You were comparing RIT to QU weren't you?
We finished with a SOS of 17 while RIT was 59. The ECAC had 8 teams in the top 25 PWR; AH had 1.
I can assure you we didn't "slide right into the top spot"... we earned it.
Ok, whatever.Nope, talking about QU sliding above NCHC schools.
Ok, whatever.![]()
I am drunk and bleeding orange right now! Let's go RIT!!
On behalf of the entire ECAC, I'd like to apologize to RIT fans for Rand's whining.