This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
That one goal was poked in by Rotolo, but to be honest, if he didn't, there was a Colgate player standing right there to do it for him. So saying it should not have happened is not quite accurate. It was a lucky shot to bloop up and over the goaltender like that, but there really wasn't much he could have done about that. It would have been nice if his flailing stick would have poked the puck away from the crease, but I think the offensive player was right there to clean up that garbage anyhow.
Although with only 7 RIT shots on goal through the first two periods, one could also say that 3-2 lead in the third was much less lopsided than the game really was to that point.
Respectfully disagree. He had to lunge quickly just to get a piece of that puck before it was going to be tapped in. There's no way he had time to get a glove anywhere near it.
.Don't say that Coach is experimenting with the lines. Folks around here think that is what practice is for
These games are probably the toughest games RIT will play this season (outside of the game against BC). I think the offense needs to get better and will as the season goes on. I don't think that AIC is a true measuring stick either as there should be no excuses for not getting at least 3 points out of the weekend and should get 4 - and probably should do the same against Army. I think the best true measuring stick is going to be the set against Bentley.
...at home, that is.
