What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

>> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Well, it was kind of a fitting end to a team that would follow incredible highs with the lowest of lows. A night after finally getting over the hump with Niagara, they quite frankly failed to show up whatsoever last Saturday night. That performance was quite frankly among their most pathetic all season. No energy, no hustle, no effort, and apparently no pride at all. Had they competed and lost I could live with it, but when you make no effort to compete? There is no excuse for that. None.
This team was quite frankly one of the most frustrating teams to watch in quite some time. They would have moments of tremendous success and follow it up with some of the worst hockey an RIT team has played in ages. Players who were going to be depended upon coming into the season failed to deliver, or underachieved greatly (with a couple of exceptions).

And maybe a large rebuilding is exactly what is in order. This team will graduate 8 players and likely lose 1 or 2 more on top of that.

The Graduates:

Madalora: was a huge part of any success this team enjoyed since he took over the job from D-Mike. He has his spot among RIT's all time goaltenders. He could keep this team in a game they didn't belong or deserve to be in, and his presence in the net was undeniable. A well deserved fan favorite.

McReynolds: If you had told RIT fans coming into this season that he would continue to be one of the best penalty killers the program has ever had, continue to be a physical presence, continue to play with a tremendous intensity while cutting back on the penalty minutes and would chip in 15 points to boot, you would have signed up in a heartbeat. And that is exactly what he did. He quietly had a tremendous season, and a very good career at RIT.

Knowles: You absolutely cannot fault the heart, the energy, the hustle, and the ability to kill penalties like an angry badger. What was truly surprising, and disappointing, was the fact he tallied a grand total of 4 points all season. 4. I was shocked when I looked at the stats sheet, but that's exactly what happened. To say that was unexpected would be an understatement, especially after posting seasons of 13 and 17 points the 2 seasons prior.

Cornacchia: I guess he played close to his career numbers this season, posting 7 points and playing to a minus 4 on the plus/minus. He was never able to take the tremendous skating ability he has and turn it into more of an offensive presence although he was a very good faceoff man and killed penalties pretty well. I cannot figure out for the life of me if he never got on track offensively because of the role he was asked to play or if it just never clicked for him at this level. From the billing he had coming in I expected a kind of dynamic playmaker, but it just never materialized over the course of his 4 years here.

Burt: One of the most perplexing players to ever don an RIT jersey continued to perplex this season. He would finish second on the team in scoring while taking the programs all time lead in scoring for the DI era. Yet for all of that, there were stretches where he simply looked disengaged from the action going on around him. Then he would snap out of that with performances that truly showed exactly how much talent he had. And at other times it looked as though he was trying to win games all by himself, putting himself in a role that no player, no matter how good they are, can sustain and making the types of mistakes you would expect. As popular a player has been with the fans in recent history, he also had a bit of a love/hate thing going on with others, often responding to criticism posted on message boards and on Twitter with heartfelt anger and frustration. Some of the criticism was valid, some was not. But if nothing else it served to underscore exactly how much he did care about RIT, the team and the game. My lasting memory of him, and the one that underscores exactly how I think he felt about RIT, will be him kneeling down at center ice and kissing the Tiger after closing out his final game at the Ritter. Yet part of me thinks there was a whole lot more in terms of performance and skill in there that never quite came out and it makes me wonder what might have been. I think had he put the blinders on and just played the game and left some of the other stuff alone, he would have gone down as a legendary figure in RIT hockey history.

Spivak: He was quietly a tremendous presence on defense this season. I had my significant doubts about him early in his career, but he became an integral part of the defensive corps and the level of his play grew dramatically during his career at RIT. While he may have established what shall be known as the "Spivak Line" in terms of offensive production, his solid defensive play was a crucial part of the success RIT did have this past season, especially after Saracino went down for the second time.

Haltigan: Chris was RIT's #1 defenseman the past 2 seasons, played in every possible situation (even, PK, PP) and simply did everything that one could ask from a #1 defenseman. His intelligence and ability as a defender is obvious the minute he steps onto the ice. He has been an absolute rock on the back end for the past 2 seasons and his leadership will be sorely missed.

Eckenswiller: He is a story in perseverance. 2 significant knee injuries really took away a large amount of time from his career at RIT and after the second one, no one could have faulted him had he chosen to walk away. He clearly wasn't quite the player he was before each of the knee injuries, but he did a workman like job.

Overall this class isn't as bad as some would make it out to be, but I can�t deny that in many regards they underachieved, which when you think about it is quite something. 4 straight trips to the AHA tournament, an NCAA frozen 4, and 2 regular season titles and they are considered by some to be underachievers. Yet I don't think it is a totally unfair tag to hang on this group, when you look at what was left on the table on so many occasions.

Obviously there will be 8 new faces stepping into the picture to fill these spots and maybe 1 or 2 more beyond that, depending on how a couple of things sort out. This team could ultimately be turning over half the roster, which would be something unprecedented in the DI era. The returning players need to significantly step up their play and this coming years recruiting class needs to be of exceptional quality, and needs to be able to step in and have a far greater impact than this years class did. This years class of freshman was a disappointment to me.

I am hoping the coaching staff has surveyed the landscape and taken note of the trend of larger, more physical players in our competitions lineup. There were a lot of occasions this past season where I felt like RIT got physically dominated and manhandled in AHA games, far more than in past seasons, when it seemed like only out of conference teams were able to physically dominate RIT for the most part.

I think next season is going to be a tough one to watch at times, with lots of young faces trying to find their way at the DI level and it will be a real test of the coaching staff to get these guys acclimated and playing well. I think this team managing to find its way to the BCA in March would be a tremendous accomplishment, and I don't think it's a likely event.
 
Last edited:
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Burt tweeted the following last night:



Anyone heard where he's off to?

Nothing on the ECHL transaction page from yesterday in reference to him. Apparently he hasn't been added to the roster yet of whatever team it is that signed him
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

It's true to an extent, but you can't tell me that, say, the Indianapolis Colts didn't disappoint this past year. Injuries happen, and they have to be overcome... but sometimes injuries are a perfectly reasonable explanation for a loss or two or three. They don't become immaterial just because they could happen to anyone.


Powers &8^]

Injuries are a part of sport, but there are some that you can not overcome...

Bah. You two are just using excuses. Yes, nobody likes it when players get hurt and it is definitely a blow, but good teams have alternatives and other players need to step up. I am not saying it is immaterial but I just I don't think it can be used to dismiss a definitively down production by the freshman.

Also as I said before, would be interesting to see how Brenner and Burt would have been as Freshmen with out Sarazin. All in all I think its crazy to expect Freshmen to carry the team...

So the world is back to normal as we disagree...

You are misunderstanding me. I do NOT think the freshman should or could carry the team. But to think they should produce at the same level as past freshman classes in not unrealistic. Especially when I would have thought that Wilson & Co. should have used the FF appearance to recruit a higher caliber of player. ***And I should state when I say high caliber I mean skill wise on the ice. Nothing to do with academics and/or character of the players.


I remember hearing this rationalization about the Tigers' gradual fall-off in results back at the end of the D-III days. "...other teams stepping up their game..." is NOT an excuse for a program the quality of RIT's. If you're at or near the top and your opponents begin stepping up, it's up to you to find a way to step up your game as well. If you're not moving forward, you're standing still. If you're standing stil while those around you are moving forward, you're actually moving backwards.
That's not to imply that I think RIT is standing still or moving backwards. It's just that if that reasoning were true, they would be.

Excellent point!

Burt tweeted the following last night:

Anyone heard where he's off to?


My guess is the Bakersfield Condors of the ECHL. But that is just a guess.
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

You are misunderstanding me. I do NOT think the freshman should or could carry the team. But to think they should produce at the same level as past freshman classes in not unrealistic. Especially when I would have thought that Wilson & Co. should have used the FF appearance to recruit a higher caliber of player. ***And I should state when I say high caliber I mean skill wise on the ice. Nothing to do with academics and/or character of the players.

I think you aren't normalizing your stats for the fact that scoring was down across the board in Atlantic Hockey this year. Air Force scored 22 (!!!) less goals this year than last. Niagara was down 19, RoMo -19, Mercyhurst -19 (noticing a trend?), Holy Cross -4, and so on and so on.

It was truly year of the goalie in the AHA, and that affected RIT as much as anyone else. The freshman scoring still accounted for a solid chunk of the overall and we had two freshman with double digit years, including Garbowsky being over 20.

Can you really watch Garbowsky and McGowan and not think they are going to be big? They were our best players on the ice most nights, and that line was the most consistent. If they had had a better skills player than T-Mac I think they would have put up fatter numbers. I remember an awful lot of scoring ops ruined by his bumbling of the play. I think that Lynch might make an interesting choice to replace him next year.
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Can you really watch Garbowsky and McGowan and not think they are going to be big? They were our best players on the ice most nights, and that line was the most consistent. If they had had a better skills player than T-Mac I think they would have put up fatter numbers. I remember an awful lot of scoring ops ruined by his bumbling of the play. I think that Lynch might make an interesting choice to replace him next year.

I loved this line this season. It was a very gritty line and that is what this team needs to start moving towards. If they put Colavecchia(or someone with a scoring touch) on this line next year it could be a disgusting line.
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Can you really watch Garbowsky and McGowan and not think they are going to be big? They were our best players on the ice most nights, and that line was the most consistent. If they had had a better skills player than T-Mac I think they would have put up fatter numbers. I remember an awful lot of scoring ops ruined by his bumbling of the play. I think that Lynch might make an interesting choice to replace him next year.

Taylor created a lot of those opportunities for that line by getting dirty in the corners and playing the body and creating turnovers, so you can argue that some of the success that line did have was directly related to the opportunities created by McReynolds...its a give and take I think when you look at that line as a whole. Certainly a more offensively gifted 3rd member might have resulted in more success, but would they have had as many chances?
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Taylor created a lot of those opportunities for that line by getting dirty in the corners and playing the body and creating turnovers, so you can argue that some of the success that line did have was directly related to the opportunities created by McReynolds...its a give and take I think when you look at that line as a whole. Certainly a more offensively gifted 3rd member might have resulted in more success, but would they have had as many chances?

Taylor was never in the role to score points. He was the tough guy. If only he had the touch.
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

I think that Lynch might make an interesting choice to replace him next year.

That sounds like a bad decision unless Lynch really steps up his game next year. When he was with Favot and Brenner, he played very well. But then this year came around and he wasn't all too impressive. Putting him with Garbowsky/McGowan would be a disaster IMO. Colavecchia would be my choice purely based on this year's observations. As we all know, however, everything could completely change come next year.
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

That sounds like a bad decision unless Lynch really steps up his game next year. When he was with Favot and Brenner, he played very well. But then this year came around and he wasn't all too impressive. Putting him with Garbowsky/McGowan would be a disaster IMO. Colavecchia would be my choice purely based on this year's observations. As we all know, however, everything could completely change come next year.

Sure. I guess with the seniors gone Colavecchia will be on a very different line. I didn't really like Smith being out there with him and Burt. I think Colavecchia with Garbowsky/McGowan would definitely be deadly. Potts also was showing signs of a breakout so I look forward to seeing where he lands.

Taylor did a lot of things well, but he was not a playmaker, and that is what that line needs.
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

My guess is the Bakersfield Condors of the ECHL. But that is just a guess.

Either that or the Stockton Thunder. A few RIT alum have played in Stockton for a bit.
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Looks like Ontario Reign

"Have to get used to my new gear soon, first game with ontario reign tomorrow #nopressure" - https://twitter.com/#!/CBurt1987/status/182169248104321024

Looking at the roster Al Mazur is also on the team, though currently on the IR
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Saw a tweet from Madalora earlier that he was at the airport heading out...not sure where, he didn't specify but mentioned forgetting to pack a tie as a rookie mistake...
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

I hope these guys didn't sign up for Spring classes. ;)


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

with regards to signing up for spring quarter classes, technically speaking they would have had to per NCAA rules as I understand them, unless they had graduated after last quarter, in which case they would be allowed to play out the season.
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

with regards to signing up for spring quarter classes, technically speaking they would have had to per NCAA rules as I understand them, unless they had graduated after last quarter, in which case they would be allowed to play out the season.

At senior night I remember a good amount of the seniors had already completed their coursework.
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

At senior night I remember a good amount of the seniors had already completed their coursework.

I knew some of 'em did but I can't remember which ones. =) Anyway, we're still in drop/add right? ;)


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Re: >> RIT Tigers 2011-12 Part II: Making Some Noise at the House that Roars <<

Saw a tweet from Madalora earlier that he was at the airport heading out...not sure where, he didn't specify but mentioned forgetting to pack a tie as a rookie mistake...

According to this: http://www.echl.com/stats/transactions.php

Madolora was added to the Stockton Thunder roster. Their opponent tonight (03/21) is Ontario Reign (Burt).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top