What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

cF[Authentic] said:
Anyone else seeing ads on mobile in the middle of every few posts over the past couple days?
Click to expand...

Yeah for a month or so now. I just prefer to think that mookie or Kepler wants me to save a lot of money refinancing my mortgage. Such nice fellas.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

French Rage said:
Yeah for a month or so now. I just prefer to think that mookie or Kepler wants me to save a lot of money refinancing my mortgage. Such nice fellas.
Click to expand...

Oh, I really do. If you just send me your credit card numbers I can generate a tremendous increase in assets. In your assets, in fact.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

BassAle said:
we can stop Trump's awful court picks with a simple majority. that's something.

Trump isn't going anywhere though, and he has a good chance of being reelected
Click to expand...

Well, by nuthin' I meant nuthin'. Nuthin' gonna get done for at least 2 and hopefully 4 years.

I'm pretty sure we can't afford that as a nation, given the hole the Republicans have already dug for us.

So what say we beat Dump and take both chambers? And then expand the Court by 4?

These 4:

<img src="https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/HGBDJFVV44I6TFI63YBEECKULU.jpg&w=767" height=300>
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

There’s our Mitt

“ GOP Sen. Mitt Romney, a potential key swing vote, dismissed the outrage from Democrats over an organizing resolution that initially called for a compressed impeachment trial schedule, saying that “our Democratic friends have forgotten the fact that if you call everything outrageous then nothing is outrageous."
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
There’s our Mitt

“ GOP Sen. Mitt Romney, a potential key swing vote, dismissed the outrage from Democrats over an organizing resolution that initially called for a compressed impeachment trial schedule, saying that “our Democratic friends have forgotten the fact that if you call everything outrageous then nothing is outrageous."
Click to expand...

Profiles in courier.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Just Mittens being Mittens! Having said that it doesn't matter to me if they have a vote to include witnesses now or at the end of the speechifying. Its a difficult vote either way for the people in electoral danger. I'd almost rather have it after the House managers have made their case.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
There’s our Mitt

“ GOP Sen. Mitt Romney, a potential key swing vote, dismissed the outrage from Democrats over an organizing resolution that initially called for a compressed impeachment trial schedule, saying that “our Democratic friends have forgotten the fact that if you call everything outrageous then nothing is outrageous."
Click to expand...

And they find this quote after McConnell already changed away from the compressed timeline. Romney must not be in the loop
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

At what point do the Dem House Managers just play 10 minutes of clips of McConnell and Graham saying impeachment must include witnesses and documents?
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

ScoobyDoo said:
I think they have a case for arguing against new witnesses. They, however, do not have a case for blocking the evidence already collected.
Click to expand...

Every impeachment in our history (POTUS or otherwise) had witnesses. What is the argument against them here? Not arguing with you but am curious of the law/precedent.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Slap Shot said:
Every impeachment in our history (POTUS or otherwise) had witnesses. What is the argument against them here? Not arguing with you but am curious of the law/precedent.
Click to expand...

Just a personal observation based on the witnesses having been called by the House already and having already testified. The Senate would only need them to testify again if they need them to clarify their previous testimony which is what happened with the Clinton impeachment. But, if they need no clarification then there's no reason to call them. As for "NEW" witnesses that's got to be up for a vote in the Senate and if 51 says no then it's no. That's the way it goes.

I do think, however, that the evidence is already overwhelming. But that's just me.
 
Re: POTUS: It Can Happen Here Again

Slap Shot said:
Every impeachment in our history (POTUS or otherwise) had witnesses. What is the argument against them here? Not arguing with you but am curious of the law/precedent.
Click to expand...

"If the Democrats really needed to hear from them, why didn't they subpoena them in the House?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top