What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 46.10: A New Hope

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey now, 150 bad feelings > 91 pieces of proof (LOLOL!!!)

You have a kindergartener's comprehension of the American legal system, frenchie. Anyway, just in case the word hasn't seeped through into the Faculty Lounge bubble, there's some interesting news on the telly today ...
 
The Right is driven solely by emotion, not reason.

Lets put this statement and your "Lack of Evidence" assertions together in a single test. Will make this simple so all can see if Kepler, the pride of Cornell, is able to reason or be driven by emotion.

1) ERIC TRUMP's laptop shows up a NY repair store and he doesnt retrieve it
2) The NY TIMES breaks the story of the laptops existence
3) On said laptop are emails, texts, pictures, dates/times and a whole host of other "data"
4) One email between ERIC and IVANKA states - 'Don't worry unlike Pop I won't make you give me half your salary,'
5) Bank records obtained by Jamie Raskin show that Erik, Don Jr, Ivanka, Tiffany, Mary and 4 "mystery" Trumps received over $ 31,000,000 from foreign countries, INCLUDING RUSSIA
6) This $ 31,000,000 is channeled thru multiple layers of shell corporations, and there is no exchange of goods or services for the payment

Is this evidence? Or lack of evidence?
 
bg091223dAPR-800x0.jpg
 
Does Chuck honestly think these (beyond awful) memes make a coherent argument? Why would anyone reply when someone simply isn't operating on the level?
 
Does Chuck honestly think these (beyond awful) memes make a coherent argument? Why would anyone reply when someone simply isn't operating on the level?

Nah. He's just using them to gin up the board and illicit responses. He's not anywhere near arguing in good faith.


I occasionally have to tee up on some of those fastballs he hangs over the heart of the plate though.
 
Nah. He's just using them to gin up the board and illicit responses. He's not anywhere near arguing in good faith.


I occasionally have to tee up on some of those fastballs he hangs over the heart of the plate though.

... are they fastballs? They look more like a hanging spinball.
 
Lets put this statement and your "Lack of Evidence" assertions together in a single test. Will make this simple so all can see if Kepler, the pride of Cornell, is able to reason or be driven by emotion.

1) ERIC TRUMP's laptop shows up a NY repair store and he doesnt retrieve it
2) The NY TIMES breaks the story of the laptops existence
3) On said laptop are emails, texts, pictures, dates/times and a whole host of other "data"
4) One email between ERIC and IVANKA states - 'Don't worry unlike Pop I won't make you give me half your salary,'
5) Bank records obtained by Jamie Raskin show that Erik, Don Jr, Ivanka, Tiffany, Mary and 4 "mystery" Trumps received over $ 31,000,000 from foreign countries, INCLUDING RUSSIA
6) This $ 31,000,000 is channeled thru multiple layers of shell corporations, and there is no exchange of goods or services for the payment

Is this evidence? Or lack of evidence?

Kep? Anyone else able to offer their reason? Or emotions?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top