Re: POTUS 45:46: New Year, Same 'Ol Crap.
We should use May, 2017. Thanks
Hmm:
This is an opinion piece that assumes an awful lot. Likely bias? Based upon what? Isn't it likely any initial bias worked in Trump's favor and not the other away around? We know how Trump viewed the ensuing mess - you (and Turly) can only speculate about attitudes and supposed ulterior motives with the FBI. Additionally to claim so much, "has been built" on the, "Democratic side" ignores this is not an investigation initiated by Democrats, dozens of actual indictments (and pleas) have already been handed out and quite frankly there's a hell of a lot more going on here than petty political games. It's actually rather shameful of you do cite such a nonsensical opinion piece as if it should blow everyone's mind.
I don't know much about this Turley, but I don't think he's quite a Fox News stooge or anything. It's not like
The Hill is
InfoWars. It's just one man's opinion piece, and it's not completely crazy.
What we know is this. First, there is no question there is a frenzy in this country over Trump, and it's existed since at least election day. Whether that frenzy is warranted or to what degree is certainly open to debate, because the guy is undoubtedly twisted and crazy.
We know that a substantial number of people associated with him have been convicted of or plead guilty to felonies. In pretty much every case, if I'm not mistaken, the convictions/pleas have been for lying. They were asked about meetings with or communications with or dealings with Russia or people from Russia, and they lied when they gave their answer. These lies have been exposed, and as a result they were convicted of or plead guilty to felonies.
In the case of Cohen, the felonies were campaign finance law violations associated with paying off escorts to keep them silent and preserve Trump's family man reputation?!?
That's really all we know. Convicting someone over lying about a meeting or communications with a Russian doesn't mean that you now have proof that Trump and the Russians colluded to rig the election or Trump is working for the Russians, or Trump is laundering money for the Russians. I know people want to make that leap. I know that people here have already made that leap. It may even turn out to be a correct guess. But, right now it's a guess.
We can sit here and talk about Trump being a puppet of Putin, of Trump being a Manchurian Candidate, of Trump and Putin conspiring to rig the US elections, etc..., but we actually don't know that and all of the blathering and name-calling directed at Sic doesn't get you any closer to it. Furthermore, even the little "it's not been
publicly revealed" doesn't get you any closer to it. Until it's publicly revealed, it's nothing. That's why when Sic came in and trolled the chorus by demanding they list the proof, instead of someone simply providing that proof all we got was six pages of name-calling, "you won't accept it when we tell you" responses, blah, blah, blah.
Now, will something come to light? A small part of me hopes so just so I can say I didn't have to sit through all of this to have Mueller tell me that we just don't know. On the other hand, it would be nice to know that our elections haven't been rigged by an outsider. I prefer to keep all the rigging in house, where it's been these past 240+ years.