Wow.
Perhaps you're right, but what I saw was a lot of kids not graduate HS and a lot of the ones that did didn't go on to college. It didn't seem that whatever standards the federal government set helped out at all. It's obviousl anecdotal and maybe in other places the standards make a big difference in the quality of education.
And that's the key. That last part is so far from true, it's not even funny.I've said it about colleges, and I believe it holds true at the public school level --> It's not the school you put the kid into, it's what the kid puts into school.
Now, hidden in that statement is the implicit understanding that the basic tools are available at the school.
Yup. But the finest schools in the world can't make a kid want to learn.
I make an example using Detroit, because it's in the news, but it's no different than the remote rural areas in Michigan. They don't seem to care.
The implication in that message is that if families don't want to support their kids, than neither should we.
Is that what we want? We don't want to make a strong path for poorer people to get out via high skilled jobs? The only lucky ones are the one with driven parents?
What about the kid with driven parents but in a district of not? They get to suffer for it?
The issue is that the system biases poor people to just stay that way. That seems hardly sustainable.
The implication in that message is that if families don't want to support their kids, than neither should we.
... the poor people want more Jesus in their schools ...
Here's the thing- kids are kids. The average should not change if you are poor or not. Unless you think otherwise....
But given the current state of the rules, it's ok to bias funding based on the region- and since property taxes correlate to income, as well as the primary funding for schools- poor areas get poor school systems. There are great areas in the metro-Detroit area that are light years different than Detroit. Thanks to efforts from DeVos, school of choice allows people WHO CAN choose do as much. But people who really can't don't have options. So they suffer. Nobody seems to get that- choice is only good when you can actually make it. So there's massive difference in kids coming from most areas not named Detroit.
And what you say is that we should just let poor areas suffer. great. Let the poor get poorer. That's an awesome solution.
And that's the key. That last part is so far from true, it's not even funny.
But we pretend it's true.
I make an example using Detroit, because it's in the news, but it's no different than the remote rural areas in Michigan. They don't seem to care.
Hey! I took handy to grand forks once
I'm pretty sure he believes you drugged him and put him into some sort of VR environment 'cause ain't nothin' beyond 494/694!![]()
That all depends upon if he thinks the Gophers won at REA or not.
Read all the other posts on this subject. Like it or not the environment you are raised in has a much bigger effect on how you do versus the quality of the schools.
I still have the photo of that billboardAh yes the weekend where the lady was arrested for watching porn with her window open in full view of a school (during recess) and spit on the cops as they arrested her! Grand Forks may smell like *** but it is definitely the height of class
Dont forget the sign about how 2 out of 5 people in Grand Forks dont know how to put a car seat in correctly![]()
Which is why we should cut social programs. Am I right?
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/02/trump-family-travel/515874/
Why are we paying for the Trump kids' business trips?
Cause...EMAILZ!!1!11!!!!!
Plus Obama golfed so it is obviously the same thing...
Is the Education Department a social program? I wouldn't consider it one.
And that is why this country fails.Is the Education Department a social program? I wouldn't consider it one.