(4) Enlarge Freitas.
Not a major barrier as that would come from a different pot of money. But getting a positive ROI on 36 rides is a major barrier.
Just some general comments/observations:
-I much prefer watching Hockey and Basketball to football although I do watch some college footbal. I live in CT and will watch UCONN games with interest.
-When it comes to BC since they have moved conferences the only sport I will ever watch (or have any interest in watching) is their hockey program. I guess it is because of the conference they play in and the rivalries still seem "natural" to me. When NESN has ACC Basketball (even against a UNC) I flip over the channel faster than an infomercial. I have "no" interest whatsoever. I'm sure it's way different in Beantown but elsewhere I'm guessing there are more people who don't watch anymore.
-In my opinion all these conferences are out of whack and nuts as it is all about $$$/TV exposure and not about natural or geographical rivalries. The BIG Ten is only looking at Rutgers (or antoher Eastern team) to tap into this audience and NOTHING ELSE!!! They want that NY Fan base.
-One of the best parts about college hockey is we still have the traditional East/Central/West rivalries so when it does come tournament time, to me it is much more interesting.
-As to UCONN hockey I do not follow it but as far as the scholarships are concerned wouldn't an upgrade to the scholarships for the men's team get easily offset by an equal upgrade to the women's team??? Arguably the women's team has made more progress and has performed better at getting competitive than the men's team has.
-As to the 5,000 seat requirement for Big East that sort of surprised me as that is really a limiting factor. Many of us ECAC fans always assumed UCONN would be the best fit but that Q Pac's ulterior motive with the TD Bank center would ultimately be to get into Hockey East but I don't think the Bank holds that many people. Interesting chatter you have going here.
-As to UCONN hockey I do not follow it but as far as the scholarships are concerned wouldn't an upgrade to the scholarships for the men's team get easily offset by an equal upgrade to the women's team??? Arguably the women's team has made more progress and has performed better at getting competitive than the men's team has.
-As to the 5,000 seat requirement for Big East that sort of surprised me as that is really a limiting factor. Many of us ECAC fans always assumed UCONN would be the best fit but that Q Pac's ulterior motive with the TD Bank center would ultimately be to get into Hockey East but I don't think the Bank holds that many people. Interesting chatter you have going here.
Under the right circumstances perhaps. I don't think they went into the ECAC thinking it was a stepping stone to HE. I think QU is a good fit for the ECAC and will remain there for quite a while.I don't doubt that QU wants to play in the Hockey East pool...
Huh? Are you serious? Are you talking about hockey, athletics in general, or academics?but they think very highly of themselves. They think that they are like Boston College or at least deserve to be.... this is what I've gotten out of them over the years...
Huh? Are you serious? Are you talking about hockey, athletics in general, or academics?
In strictly hockey terms, we have yet to sustain a formidable presence in the ECAC, let alone D1 hockey. I think we'll get there someday, but until we do comparing ourselves to the likes of BC is almost laughable.
As for academics I do think (and agree) that QU thinks highly of themselves. It is a quality private institution that can compete with many other schools out there.
So what is it then? You're contradiciting what you said earlier and have got me confused.I just take in the attitudes of people... and that's the feeling I get. I don't think they believe they are there in athletics or in hockey... and I don't think they're using BC as a comparison point.
I don't remember that but have to assume it was before joining the ECAC. Certainly we weren't comparing ourselves to BC back in our AH days...Do you remember when QU took the team photo at the Boston Garden?
Yup, the compensating rides would have to come in some other sport as the women's hockey rides were used to offset football's rise to what used to be called D-1A from D-1AA. That other sport would almost certainly be a non-revenue sport. Thus the business case would not be very attractive. Actually, downright unattractive would be a better way to put it.Also doesnt the Womens Team currently already have 18 athletes on scholarship since they play in HE and HE has a rule about members using full allotment of scholarships?
Yup, the compensating rides would have to come in some other sport as the women's hockey rides were used to offset football's rise to what used to be called D-1A from D-1AA. That other sport would almost certainly be a non-revenue sport. Thus the business case would not be very attractive. Actually, downright unattractive would be a better way to put it.
So what is it then? You're contradiciting what you said earlier and have got me confused.![]()
UCONN does not meet standards to join HE. Any school that currently wants to join Hockey East must have an arena with a a capacity of over 5000.
The University of Connecticut, as a school, is already a member of Hockey East. Does that fact change the accounting any?
Powers &8^]
So is UConn.. the women's hockey team plays in Hockey East. I think LtPowers is asking if that carries any weight should the men want to switch.There is no connection between Hockey East and the Big East besides for the word "East" and the fact that Providence is in both.
First off, for clarification, my comments weren't meant to be argumentative (to him or anyone else)... I am just confused by his statements.Don't worry. You're not the only one. Our friend Patman seems to "..take in attitudes of people..."
What confuses me is who are the "people" he refers too?
So is UConn.. the women's hockey team plays in Hockey East. I think LtPowers is asking if that carries any weight should the men want to switch.
There is no connection between Hockey East and the Big East besides for the word "East" and the fact that Providence is in both.
They would still need to be voted on by the current members regardless of the women's program being already in H.E. They currently have no plans to expand beyond the current 10 as it would create scheduling problems and eliminate team's opportunities to schedule OOC games.
Oh for... look, the quotation was "Any school that currently wants to join Hockey East must have an arena with a a capacity of over 5000." The University of Connecticut has already joined Hockey East. So my question was, does that fact mean that the statement at arena capacity is irrelevant? Or did CHFAN222 mean "Any school that wants to add a men's program to Hockey East must have an arena..."?
Powers &8^]