When Plattsburgh canceled theirs back in the mid-2000's there wasn't no big huge press release or public statement then either....must be they were trying to "cover it up" too...
I give Oswego credit. They admitted there was an issue, and are correcting it THEMSELVES, with out the NCAA telling them (publicly) that they have to...
Like I and another OSU fan were discussing last night, I wish we knew the "breakdown" of just how close to the 50% ratio OSU was. I have a strong feeling they are not that far off of it. Surely not the 90%+ that OTHER schools were....the ones who got a "don't do it again" slap on the wrist....
As we continued to discuss, this whole FA packages is really unique to hockey, and more so DIII hockey. You don't find really any other sport where 75% of a roster is foreign student athletes. I'm not sure but I am willing to bet the American/Foreign ratio on Mt.Vernon's football team is no where near 75% not any of the top football teams. Same with basketball, baseball, tennis, ect.... It's something the NCAA could and should step in and put more of a guideline on both in penalties and regulations.
Schools could essentially give a 99% international grant to 26 student athletes and another 27 to non-student athletes IF the school agreed to allow such a cut in tuition coming in. 53 essential "free" rides at a smaller DIII school where every penny really matters in today budget, but anyways it could happen.
The NCAA needs to set a limit, a % limit. You are allowed to give out a max of 15% of your tuition for international package grants.
On top of that, the NCAA should also set different penalties for the misuse.
50-60% athletes - Stern talking to, probation (you have to give some in case people don't show up off setting the ratio)
61-70% athletes - Loss of grants for 3 years
71-80% athletes - Loss of grants for 3 years, plus 1 year loss of post season
81-90% athletes - Loss of grants for 3 years, 3 year loss of post season
-90% + athletes - Loss of grants for 3 years, 3 year loss of post season, loss of records during illegal use of grants
Sorry but if you are at 90% or more its obviously flagrant what you're doing