What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Just took a quick look at the WCHA composite schedule. Looks like your next series is a big one towards an obvious goal a maintaining a firm grip on 2nd place in the conference standings. Lose two and the gap becomes seriously tight. That's surely not what I'm hoping to see...but it's a big series for the Buckeyes to stay on course for a top spot in the standings...no? I'll be watching this one closely from afar. Hoping the Buckeyes make a statement on their own behalf per their intentions for 2012-2013.
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Just took a quick look at the WCHA composite schedule. Looks like your next series is a big one towards an obvious goal a maintaining a firm grip on 2nd place in the conference standings. Lose two and the gap becomes seriously tight. That's surely not what I'm hoping to see...but it's a big series for the Buckeyes to stay on course for a top spot in the standings...no? I'll be watching this one closely from afar. Hoping the Buckeyes make a statement on their own behalf per their intentions for 2012-2013.

We're off this coming weekend, then, as you alluded to, big series vs Wisconsin. I think we have a good shot at taking one of these games, maybe both since we're at home.
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Just came across this tidbit in a USCHO story about OSU's men's program:

"Ohio State fans should keep an ear out for talk of a new hockey-only arena. According to Osiecki, the plans are tentative but real for a facility to house only men’s and women’s ice hockey."

http://www.uscho.com/2012/11/28/osiecki-ohio-state-seek-growth-for-their-program-and-their-sport/

Needless to say, us OSU Hockey fans are very excited about this! We have been wanting this for a long time! Playing in the Schott (17,500 capacity) in front of 4,000 fans, along with the OSU Ice Rink being the worst facility in the WCHA hands-down, hurts recruiting for both programs. I just hope they do it right and raise the funds to build something like Minnesota has, with a mens arena and a womens arena. I don't want to see a 5,000 - 6,000 arena for both. Build a 3,000 seater for womens and an adjacent 8,000 - 9,000 seat arena for the men. We draw that for games against Miami and Michigan in down years. If Coach Osiecki gets are program to the level he wants to, we'll sell out an 8,000 - 9,000 seat arena on a regular basis in Columbus. But yes, this is exciting news. And 3,000 will be fine for our womens program.
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Needless to say, us OSU Hockey fans are very excited about this! We have been wanting this for a long time! Playing in the Schott (17,500 capacity) in front of 4,000 fans, along with the OSU Ice Rink being the worst facility in the WCHA hands-down, hurts recruiting for both programs.
Don't know if you've been to All Seasons in Mankato, but I'd describe that facility as pretty comparable to the Ice Rink. Also, it shouldn't be forgotten that the post-renovation Ice Rink is a significantly better situation than the pre-renovation Ice Rink. That said, your recruiting point is well taken.

I just hope they do it right and raise the funds to build something like Minnesota has, with a mens arena and a womens arena.
I would certainly like to see two ice sheets. Not only would that benefit the Varsity teams, it would be very helpful for everyone who uses the ice: Club teams, Intramurals, Figure Skaters, everybody. But whether both ice sheets need substantial seating is a separate issue. Friends from Minnesota tell me that whether or not to have seating at what became Ridder Arena was controversial. Ultimately, I agree that the Mariucci/Ridder combination is pretty much the ideal set-up. Each program has a building specifically designed for their needs. And yet, I do see the critics' side of it. As long as the new facility would be for ice sports only, a second set of seats may have a hard time surviving a cost/benefit analysis. And if this was a close call in Minnesota, isn't it likely to be a tough sell here?

I don't want to see a 5,000 - 6,000 arena for both. Build a 3,000 seater for womens and an adjacent 8,000 - 9,000 seat arena for the men. We draw that for games against Miami and Michigan in down years. If Coach Osiecki gets are program to the level he wants to, we'll sell out an 8,000 - 9,000 seat arena on a regular basis in Columbus. But yes, this is exciting news. And 3,000 will be fine for our womens program.
Over the years I've tossed around 7000 -- 8000 seats as an ideal size for my dream Ohio Ice Center*. So we're starting out at more or less the same place.

Yet, to play devil's advocate for a moment, the 6000 size could actually work for the Men -- with one stipulation: Games against Michigan and Miami would be held in the Schott. Now after a few years of the BTHC, maybe Miami drops off that list. So if we're just talking about a couple of games a season, and the new facility is really right across the street from the Schott, (see Master Plan) maybe that's a viable arrangement.

Regardless of the Schott's availability for special occasions, I agree that 3000 is simply too small for Men's Hockey. And at 6000, Men's games might be a tough ticket for half the schedule. But would that really be such a bad thing?

For the Women's team: 6000 is too big, and 9000 is problematic. Hence your desire for a 3000 seat facility. But if we're looking at one ice sheet, take it or leave it, maybe 6,000 is the sweet spot. For the Women, anything over 2000 is going to be too roomy. But with some thoughtful architecture, creating a space compatible with smaller crowds might be achievable in the 6000 seat version. The same goal might be a mission impossible in a 9000 seat arena.

This is indeed an exciting conversation. And my thinking is very preliminary; I may change my mind on some of the particulars as I hear the arguments and evidence from all sides. But I will say this: It's extremely important that "the powers that be" get the seating capacity right this time. The question needs to be thought through backwards and forward, short-term and long-term, taking both programs fully into account. This isn't an easy call. For that reason, the fact that we're going to be waiting for a few years for such a project to be launched has its advantages. Getting this right is actually more important than getting it fast.


*Yes, part of my dream is that a new Ice Rink be named as a descendent of Ohio Stadium, rather than sold to a corporate sponsor. Realistically speaking, I know this isn't the most likely result. OK, a Powerball win has been mentioned; that'd do it. Or maybe a well-healed donor with a taste for classic names will come forward. But at least let me dream; I genuinely like the name Ohio Ice Center.
 
Last edited:
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Don't know if you've been to All Seasons in Mankato, but I'd describe that facility as pretty comparable to the Ice Rink. Also, it shouldn't be forgotten that the post-renovation Ice Rink is a significantly better situation than the pre-renovation Ice Rink. That said, your recruiting point is well taken.

I would certainly like to see two ice sheets. Not only would that benefit the Varsity teams, it would be very helpful for everyone who uses the ice: Club teams, Intramurals, Figure Skaters, everybody. But whether both ice sheets need substantial seating is a separate issue. Friends from Minnesota tell me that whether or not to have seating at what became Ridder Arena was controversial. Ultimately, I agree that the Mariucci/Ridder combination is pretty much the ideal set-up. Each program has a building specifically designed for their needs. And yet, I do see the critics' side of it. As long as the new facility would be for ice sports only, a second set of seats may have a hard time surviving a cost/benefit analysis. And if this was a close call in Minnesota, isn't it likely to be a tough sell here?

Over the years I've tossed around 7000 -- 8000 seats as an ideal size for my dream Ohio Ice Center*. So we're starting out at more or less the same place.

Yet, to play devil's advocate for a moment, the 6000 size could actually work for the Men -- with one stipulation: Games against Michigan and Miami would be held in the Schott. Now after a few years of the BTHC, maybe Miami drops off that list. So if we're just talking about a couple of games a season, and the new facility is really right across the street from the Schott, (see Master Plan) maybe that's a viable arrangement.

Regardless of the Schott's availability for special occasions, I agree that 3000 is simply too small for Men's Hockey. And at 6000, Men's games might be a tough ticket for half the schedule. But would that really be such a bad thing?

For the Women's team: 6000 is too big, and 9000 is problematic. Hence your desire for a 3000 seat facility. But if we're looking at one ice sheet, take it or leave it, maybe 6,000 is the sweet spot. For the Women, anything over 2000 is going to be too roomy. But with some thoughtful architecture, creating a space compatible with smaller crowds might be achievable in the 6000 seat version. The same goal might be a mission impossible in a 9000 seat arena.

This is indeed an exciting conversation. And my thinking is very preliminary; I may change my mind on some of the particulars as I hear the arguments and evidence from all sides. But I will say this: It's extremely important that "the powers that be" get the seating capacity right this time. The question needs to be thought through backwards and forward, short-term and long-term, taking both programs fully into account. This isn't an easy call. For that reason, the fact that we're going to be waiting for a few years for such a project to be launched has its advantages. Getting this right is actually more important than getting it fast.


*Yes, part of my dream is that a new Ice Rink be named as a descendent of Ohio Stadium, rather than sold to a corporate sponsor. Realistically speaking, I know this isn't the most likely result. OK, a Powerball win has been mentioned; that'd do it. Or maybe a well-healed donor with a taste for classic names will come forward. But at least let me dream; I genuinely like the name Ohio Ice Center.

Great points Pgb. I have never been to All Seasons, but my understanding from other posters was that the Minnesota State women were moving to the Verizon Wireless Center this season where their men play. Maybe that didn't end up coming to fruition. Having two sheets of ice/two arenas is probably a dream, but the reason I thought we would be getting two was the original report calling for a 3,000 seat ice arena, which as we both agree, is way too small for a mens hockey game at Ohio State. If they build an arena that seats 5,000 - 6,000, we'll probably see ticket prices go up since they will have a third of the capacity they once did with the Schott. I would be very happy if they went with your dream venue ... the Ohio Ice Center ... capacity 8,000. It would obviously be a bit large for the women, but that would be a great size for a mens arena, not too big, but not too small. If they do go with 5,000 - 6,000, they may have to have some of the bigger games at the Schott as they may not want to have to turn away a potentially bigger crowd.
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

I have never been to All Seasons, but my understanding from other posters was that the Minnesota State women were moving to the Verizon Wireless Center this season where their men play.
Didn't happen this year. I haven't heard whether or not that is a future conversation.

Having now been to OSU Ice Rink, my impression is that it has better spectator seating and a better scoreboard than All Seasons, but those are about the only advantages when comparing side-by-side. All Seasons has a warming area with the concession stand and restrooms (the latter are pretty poor but at least they're in the same building), whereas you have to go across the sidewalk to St. Johns Arena to find both of those in Columbus. All Seasons also has both locker rooms at ice level in the building (though, admittedly, that wasn't the case until a renovation within the last 10 years -- the old visitor locker room had been upstairs). And it also has a second ice sheet -- according to rinkfinder.com, the main sheet is Olympic sized and the second one is NHL/North American sized.
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

...Having now been to OSU Ice Rink, my impression is that it has better spectator seating and a better scoreboard than All Seasons, but those are about the only advantages when comparing side-by-side.
It's been over 5 years since I've to Mankato for games, but that description matches my memories.

All Seasons has a warming area with the concession stand and restrooms (the latter are pretty poor but at least they're in the same building), whereas you have to go across the sidewalk to St. Johns Arena to find both of those in Columbus. All Seasons also has both locker rooms at ice level in the building (though, admittedly, that wasn't the case until a renovation within the last 10 years -- the old visitor locker room had been upstairs).
The warming area at All Seasons is a selling point, no question. But hold on. Door-to-door, the Ice Rink and St. John Arena are maybe 15 feet apart. And it's a covered breezeway. Are you trying to tell me it got a little chilly for you?:eek: I wouldn't buy that one from a Columbus buddy, and I'm sure not buying it from a Minnesotan.:p

And it also has a second ice sheet -- according to rinkfinder.com, the main sheet is Olympic sized and the second one is NHL/North American sized.
Clear advantage for Mankato. I either missed the second rink during my visit, or it's been added since I was there.

All kidding about the breezeway aside, your comparison of the two facilities is very fair.

... Having two sheets of ice/two arenas is probably a dream...
My belief is that a two sheet project is doable, and should happen. Note that the Chillers (Dublin, Easton & North) each have two ice sheets. Granted, there are CBJ $$ are involved in the Chillers these days, but the Dublin facility was built during the Columbus Chill's run. And the ECHL is hardly a deep pocket operation.

The second sheet of ice would push up the cost, but money really becomes an issue when you're talking about two arenas with seating. While the latter would be ideal, I'd describe it as possible but a rather steep uphill climb.

Doing any of the above without strings-attached corporate donations? OK, now we're dreaming. But hey. Sometimes dreams come true.

Don't get me wrong. I am grateful for the corporate support received by OSU Athletics, and I think well of the companies that provide it. It's just that I'm old school enough to yearn for the days when sports facilities were named after their communities, coaches, athletes or even university presidents.

It would be awesome to have the name Ohio Ice Center attached to new facilities for Buckeye Hockey. Now if something identical went up named the Burger King Ice Center, I'd get over the disappointment. But my old school side would indeed be initially disappointed.
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

How is the ice in OSU Ice Rink? I've heard from a number of sources over the years that players don't really like playing on All Seasons sheet. (the NHL-sized one where the Mav's play.)
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Very appropriate question. Pre-renovation -- which can be read as pre-Women's WCHA -- ice quality was an issue. The building was something other than airtight; the weather outdoors could affect the ice inside. Plus, the facility got extremely heavy use. Open skating sessions could be jammed packed; figure skaters' toe picks took a vicious toll. Hence ice quality wasn't reliable. But on a personal level, that didn't stop me from being on that ice sheet a couple of times a week and having a great deal of fun there.

These days I'm not on the ice nearly as much.:( And when I am, it's likely to be at one of the other rinks that are now available in Central Ohio. So I can't really give you a reliable personal assessment. But my understanding is that the Ice Rink is now in the middle of the pack in terms of ice quality. At the very least, it doesn't have a basketball floor on top of it half the time. Just as importantly, the post-renovation refrigeration system and improved structure now gives the rink staff a fighting chance. And for better or worse, the availability of the newer rinks has lessened the intensity of the usage at the Ice Rink.

I'll ask around a little. If the response I get is markedly different than the previous paragraph, I'll post on this again. Naturally if anyone else on the board has more detailed information, please chime in.
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Great points Pgb. I have never been to All Seasons, but my understanding from other posters was that the Minnesota State women were moving to the Verizon Wireless Center this season where their men play. Maybe that didn't end up coming to fruition.
From what I've read from down there, that was the plan. The city was trying to get bonding passed through the state to build a practice facility across the street from the Verizon Center and upgrade the facilities. The plan was to make the Verizon Center the home arena for both teams.
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Does anyone know what happened to Madison Marcotte? In looking at the box scores, it appears she has not played since the first game vs Wisconsin on 11/16. I did not know she was injured. Hopefully, she will be back for the second half of the season!
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Very appropriate question. Pre-renovation -- which can be read as pre-Women's WCHA -- ice quality was an issue. The building was something other than airtight; the weather outdoors could affect the ice inside. Plus, the facility got extremely heavy use. Open skating sessions could be jammed packed; figure skaters' toe picks took a vicious toll. Hence ice quality wasn't reliable. But on a personal level, that didn't stop me from being on that ice sheet a couple of times a week and having a great deal of fun there.

These days I'm not on the ice nearly as much.:( And when I am, it's likely to be at one of the other rinks that are now available in Central Ohio. So I can't really give you a reliable personal assessment. But my understanding is that the Ice Rink is now in the middle of the pack in terms of ice quality. At the very least, it doesn't have a basketball floor on top of it half the time. Just as importantly, the post-renovation refrigeration system and improved structure now gives the rink staff a fighting chance. And for better or worse, the availability of the newer rinks has lessened the intensity of the usage at the Ice Rink.

I'll ask around a little. If the response I get is markedly different than the previous paragraph, I'll post on this again. Naturally if anyone else on the board has more detailed information, please chime in.

Pgb, totally off topic here, but I got a hockey sweater for Christmas that I expected to have numbers, but didn't. Do you happen to know where I could take it to get some numbers put on it? The color scheme is blue and white (blue sweater, just needs white numbers on the front and back).
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Let me ask: Are you trying to match the exact specifications for an existing team? Or is this a one of kind creation for just you and/or a rec league team?

The reason I ask: If you're trying for an authentic reproduction, it's important to go to a hockey shop that does this sort of thing regularly. My understanding is that a "kit" must be purchased and royalties paid if you're going the authentic route. Work outside the system and you're likely to get something that looks a little "off" -- because it is. Conversely, if this is your design or a teammate's design, any sports shop that embroiders uniforms (regardless of the particular sport) should be able to handle the order.

Help me focus on the specific question and then I'll post some more information on this.

Preliminary answer: In Columbus, the main hockey store (other than OSU Ice Rink Pro Shop) is The Hockey Stop on Bethel Road. I can't tell you whether they do embroidery or not, but it's worth asking. Failing that, I do know some out-of-town shops you could work with.
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

pgb, this post from another thread may help:

In other news, received the Toronto Furies jersey I ordered last week! It will officially be my favorite Christmas present as soon as I send it back so they can put the numbers on it that it was supposed to have when I received it!
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Let me ask: Are you trying to match the exact specifications for an existing team? Or is this a one of kind creation for just you and/or a rec league team?

The reason I ask: If you're trying for an authentic reproduction, it's important to go to a hockey shop that does this sort of thing regularly. My understanding is that a "kit" must be purchased and royalties paid if you're going the authentic route. Work outside the system and you're likely to get something that looks a little "off" -- because it is. Conversely, if this is your design or a teammate's design, any sports shop that embroiders uniforms (regardless of the particular sport) should be able to handle the order.

Help me focus on the specific question and then I'll post some more information on this.

Preliminary answer: In Columbus, the main hockey store (other than OSU Ice Rink Pro Shop) is The Hockey Stop on Bethel Road. I can't tell you whether they do embroidery or not, but it's worth asking. Failing that, I do know some out-of-town shops you could work with.

ARM nailed it Pgb! Haha, I received the jersey, but it didn't have the number on it (DOH). I received an email from someone with the CWHL. They had me return the jersey and they are going to correct it. They're going to hand-deliver it to me next weekend when we go up to see them play Brampton. Nice catch, there, ARM! :D
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Problem solved; that's what we like to see. Obviously getting what you paid for from the original vendor is going to be the best option.:)
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Final From Saturday, January 5th
Ohio State Intrasquad Game & Skills Contest
OSU White 12.5
OSU Gray 11.5

Evenly Matched Intrasquad Competition Goes To White On Final Shot
First, a 25 minute running time scrimmage. Result: 4-3 White. Then, on to the skills contest. It couldn't have been a closer competition. For example, in the Hardest Shot event, one pair of shooters finished exactly tied at 71 mph. When an extra set of shots couldn't break the deadlock, each squad was awarded half a point for that pairing. It must be noted that Coach Mox projected a imposing presence behind the net with her radar gun. That could have kept speeds down just a touch.:)

Ultimately it all came down to the final event, the Full Roster Final Shootout. Even after everyone had shot, the overall score remained tied. Finally, on the third pair of extra shooters, White earned the decisive point. But while White may have won, no one lost. It was an enjoyable, entertaining afternoon for all.


Three Stars of the Intrasquad Game: More Unofficial Than Ever!

Honorable Mention, Kara Gust, Gray
Kara hasn't netted her first goal as a Buckeye, but today's competition certainly proves it's coming. Gust won her pairing in the Shooting Accuracy event. Then, for good measure, she shelfed a beauty during the Final Shootout.

#3 Star: Kayla Sullivan, White
Competition-Winning Goal in the Final Shootout!

#2 Star: Julia McKinnon, Gray
Two nicely placed goals during the scrimmage caught the eye. Julia's accurate shooting keyed the Gray team win in the Relay event. McKinnonn also won her pairing in the Speed Skating.

#1 Star: Hokey Langan, White
Hokey came to play from the start. Although she didn't quite pull it off, it looked like she was trying to take the opening face-off directly down the ice for a scoring opportunity. Nevertheless, she dominated the scrimmage with three points, including a penalty shot conversion and the scrimmage-winning goal. Langan was also a major factor throughout the skills contest, highlighted by her overall victory in the Hardest Shot event. There were lots of fine performances, but #12 was the best player on the ice today.


Up Next: Road Trip to Wisconsin
 
Last edited:
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Pgb, thoroughly enjoyable afternoon at the OSU Ice Rink today! Agree that Hokey was the best player on the ice! Watching the speed skating event cemented my belief that we have some fast skaters on our team! It was great to see the coaching staff and kids at a somewhat informal event where they could have some fun and show off their skills! Big series next weekend at Wisconsin!
 
Re: Ohio State Buckeyes 2012-2013 Thread

Big series indeed.

But before we move forward, let me take just a moment to commend the coaches for the well organized, fast paced skills contest. I've been to similar events at other venues that had lots of "dead time" and other shortcomings. Not so in this case; it was a job well done.

On to Wisconsin.
 
Back
Top